Response of male BUT big 6 turkeys to varying amino acid feeding programs.

Degussa AG, FA-M-AN, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457 Hanau, Germany.
Poultry Science (Impact Factor: 1.54). 05/2006; 85(4):652-60. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.4.652
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Dietary protein is a major cost contributor in turkey nutrition. Therefore, a feeding trial with male BUT Big 6 turkeys to 154 d of age was conducted to examine how live performance and economics are affected when dietary amino acid levels are altered in different phases. Six dietary treatments were run with treatment 1 as the control in which balanced protein levels were according to recommendations during all 6 phases. Treatments 2 through 6 used combinations of balanced protein (based on lysine) that ranged from 90 to 120% of those used in treatment 1. The combinations for the 6 phases of feeding were 120, 120, 120, 120, 90, and 90% for treatment 2; 120, 120, 120, 100, 90, and 90% for treatment 3; 120, 120, 100, 100, 90, and 90% for treatment 4; 120, 120, 120, 120, 100, and 100% for treatment 5; and 90, 90, 90, 100, 100, and 100 for treatment 6. Final BW was highest in treatment 4 and lowest in treatment 2 (P < 0.05), whereas final BW were intermediate and statistically not different in treatments 1, 3, 5, and 6. Breast meat yield was highest in treatment 5 and lowest in treatments 2 and 3 (P < 0.05). Mortality seemed to be reduced in treatment 6 compared with treatments 2, 3, and 5 (P < 0.10). Performance data in combination with economic simulations suggested that the feeding regimens of treatments 4 or 6 might be alternative strategies to treatment 1 to improve overall profitability.


Available from: Andreas Lemme, Mar 13, 2015
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a global demand for turkey products and a high value attributed to breast meat from these birds. Breast meat can be considered the most important component of the carcass and consequently it is important to investigate factors that influence breast meat yield (BMY). The BMY trait is influenced by both genetics and the environment at all stages from pre-hatch until the end of the commercial growing period. Additive genetic effects appear to be the primary contributor to BMY, as there is minimal evidence for heterosis or maternal inheritance. The genetic potential for BMY is affected by sex, strain, and selection pressure within a pure line and this affects both muscle morphology and yield. For a turkey to fulfil its full genetic potential for BMY, optimal husbandry and management is required. Nutrition is an important component of production efficiency, although turkeys may be able to tolerate a reduction in dietary protein levels without a negative response in BMY, provided that the levels of all other nutrients are sufficient to meet metabolic needs. Housing conditions, such as barn temperature and lighting, also influence production efficiency. Cooler temperatures increase both weight gain and BMY, relative to a warmer rearing environment. Further, a light cycling programme with a daily set light and dark schedule is associated with higher BMY values compared to frequently alternating light and dark periods throughout the day in an intermittent lighting regime. Due to the influence of both genetics and the environment on BMY, maximisation of yield requires optimum management by all segments of the turkey production industry from the primary breeder through to the commercial grower.
    World's Poultry Science Journal 05/2010; 66(02):189 - 202. DOI:10.1017/S0043933910000255 · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Turkeys are constantly being genetically selected and improved till now for better performance, however some problems occurred related to metabolically and physiological. Thus, owing to fast growing and high live weight some problems revealed as to circulation and skeletal system. Restricted feeding methods were enhanced alternatively preferring to ad libitum feeding, to make contribution aforesaid problems and in the same time decreasing feeding cost, increasing feed efficiency and leaner carcass yield. However, to be obtained success is affected by; the severity and duration of the period of undernutrition, growing period, genotype and sex, period of refeeding, diet nutrient content and level of feed intake during realimentation. A good feeding program, should not negatively affect slaughtering weight and carcass traits.
    5. Ulusal Zootekni Bilim Kongresi, Van _Turkey; 09/2007