Article
Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments.
Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Accident Analysis & Prevention (impact factor:
1.87).
10/2006;
38(5):887-94.
DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.014
pp.887-94
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (2)
-
Article: Useful Field of Vision and Peripheral Reaction Time
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Driving performance can deteriorate and become potentially dangerous when someone pays attention to a secondary task at the expenses of the attention needed to the main driving task. We wanted to verify if there were differences on the capacity of novice drivers to detect peripheral lights at the left or right over the front panel, according to their status (team-sport players and non-players). To force them to divide attention, there were several marks in the pavement they had to pass over. An experimental group of non-players was submitted to the Peripheral Vision and Reaction Time (PVRT) Training Program, to verify if it would improve significantly more than the control group. The results show us that team-sport players surpassed in a significant way non-players in the detection of peripheral stimuli, though there were no significant differences on the peripheral reaction time. After the Training Program, the non-players experimental group scored significantly better than the non-trained group, diminishing significantly, also, their peripheral reaction time, showing that it is possible to develop and transfer perceptual skills from perceptual-motor activity to driving that help to diminish the distraction or lack of ability to divide attention between central and peripheral tasks.Advances in Transportation Studies an international Journal. 01/2009; Section B 19:77-84. -
Article: In-vehicle dialogue management-towards distinguishing between different types of workload
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In-vehicle dialogue systems demand dialogue management that takes the cognitive workload of the driver into consid-eration. When doing so, it is important to distinguish be-tween two types of cognitive load, namely cognitive load that is driving-induced, i.e. that affects the driving behaviour, or dialogue-induced, i.e. arise from the dialogue itself. In the first case we believe that the dialogue should pause to let the driver concentrate on the driving task, while in the second case the dialogue system should reformulate its question to make the dialogue task easier for the driver. We will present a novel theory of how to do this, and also present findings from a user study made in the DICO project 1 .
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
attention resource savings
cognitive workload
cognitive workload levels
driver experience
drivers
driving task
experienced counterparts
experienced drivers
field study
Inexperienced
inexperienced drivers
large
low mileage drivers
peripheral detection task
secondary task method
statistically significant difference
theoretical psychological models
unexpected traffic situations