Mild hepatic steatosis is not a major risk factor for hepatectomy and regenerative power is not impaired
ABSTRACT An understanding of the regeneration power and operative risk of steatotic livers after hepatectomy is still unclear. We evaluated the volume regeneration and outcome of steatotic livers after donor hepatectomy.
Fifty-four, consecutive living liver donors from September 2002 to December 2003 were evaluated prospectively by volumetric analysis, liver-spleen ratio, and liver attenuation index; the latter has been shown by serial computed tomographic scanning to be correlated strongly with histologic steatosis. Donors were followed up completely for at least 1 year (460-915 days) and were allocated according to histologic degree of macrovesicular steatosis: group 1, <5% (n = 36); group 2, 5%-30% (n = 18).
No mortality or hepatic failure was observed, and no donor required reoperation or intraoperative transfusion. The results of serial liver function tests, and major and minor morbidities were comparable between groups. Liver-spleen ratio and liver attenuation index remained at a constant level above normal values postoperatively in group 1, but increased rapidly above normal values in group 2. No difference in the rate of liver regeneration at 10 days after hepatectomy was found between the groups (P = .487), but the liver regeneration rate at 3 months after hepatectomy in group 1 was slightly higher than that in group 2 (P < .044). However, no difference was observed between the 2 groups at 1 year after hepatectomy (P = .4).
Mild hepatic steatosis is cleared immediately after hepatectomy, and early regeneration power is impaired, but the long-term regenerative power is comparable. Hepatectomy in donors with mild steatosis can be performed with low morbidity.
- SourceAvailable from: onlinelibrary.wiley.com[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Early postoperative graft function assessments are essential after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to predict patient and graft outcome. Computed tomography (CT) is usually used to evaluate various complications and parenchymal abnormalities after LDLT. Here, we attempted to determine the prognostic values of CT attenuation changes of grafts for predicting 1-year patient survival. Liver attenuation indices (LAIs), derived from differences between hepatic and splenic attenuations, were calculated on unenhanced CT images obtained 10 days after LDLT in 62 adult LDLT recipients between September 2002 and August 2004. Patients were assigned to 1 of 2 groups according to LAI value on the 10th postoperative day, as follows: group L (LAI < or = 5, n = 14) or group H (LAI > 5, n = 48). Parenchymal dysfunction scores, summed parameters for histological dysfunction including both portal tract and centrilobular features, were also assessed on the 10th postoperative day using liver biopsy specimens. Histological parenchymal dysfunction, especially in the centrilobular area, in terms of cholestasis, centrilobular necroinflammation, central vein fibrosis, steatosis, mononuclear infiltrates, and hepatocyte ballooning, was more prominent in group L than in group H, while that in the portal area was similar between the 2 study groups. Significant negative linear correlations were observed between LAI and parenchymal dysfunction scores (r = 0.486, P < 0.001). Group L patients showed lower 1-year survival (69.7%) than group H patients (95.8%; P = 0.0002). Moreover, group H patients died with a functioning graft (n = 3), whereas group L patients died of graft failure (n = 6). After multivariate analysis, LAI alone remained independently associated with 1-year mortality (P = 0.014; odds ratio = 0.845; 95% confidence interval, 0.739-0.967). The sensitivity and specificity of LAI were 84.6% and 75%, respectively, and LAI outperformed MELD score as a predictor of 1-year mortality after LDLT by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In conclusion, LAI, as determined by unenhanced CT 10 days after LDLT, well predicts 1-year patient survival after LDLT.Liver Transplantation 09/2006; 12(9):1403-11. DOI:10.1002/lt.20772 · 3.79 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A clear understanding of the mechanisms in steatotic livers that trigger cholestasis or hyperbilirubinemia after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains elusive. We hypothesized that microarchitectural disturbance might occur within regenerating steatotic livers without impairment of hepatic proliferative activity. Liver biopsy specimens from 67 LDLT recipients taken at the 10th postoperative day were scored for the numbers of portal tracts per area (nPT/A) of liver tissue and for intrahepatic cholestasis, and immunostained by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67. The preoperative degree of macrovesicular steatosis (MaS) was independently associated with cholestasis after LDLT (P < 0.001). Serum total bilirubin results on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days post-LDLT in MaS+ (5-30% of MaS; n = 37) patients were significantly higher than those in MaS- (<5% of MaS; n = 30) patients (P = 0.030, 0.042, and 0.019, respectively). Mean numbers of positively stained hepatocytes were 53.1 +/- 12.0 in patients with MaS and 48.0 +/- 17.1 in those without MaS by PCNA (P = 0.390), and 24.4 +/- 10.5 and 24.0 +/- 14.0 by Ki-67 (P = 0.940). However, a significant negative correlation was found between the degree of MaS and nPT/A (P = 0.013), and nPT/A was correlated with the grade of histological cholestasis (r = 0.350, P = 0.039). Intrahepatic cholestasis and hyperbilirubinemia after LDLT could be caused by scanty morphologic change of portal tract during steatotic liver regeneration.Transplant International 10/2006; 19(10):807-13. DOI:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00355.x · 3.16 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Radiology has gained importance in the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. Ultrasonography is usually the first imaging modality for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis. Unenhanced CT with or without dual kVp measurement and MRI with in and out of phase sequence can allow objective evaluation of hepatic steatosis. However, none of the imaging modalities can differentiate non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/fatty liver disease from simple steatosis. Evaluation of hepatic steatosis is important in donor evaluation before orthotopic liver transplantation and hepatic surgery. Recently, one-stop shop evaluation of potential liver donors has become possible by CT and MRI integrating vascular, parenchymal, volume and steatosis evaluation. Moreover hepatic steatosis (diffuse, multinodular, focal, subcortical, perilesional, intralesional, periportal and perivenular), hypersteatosis and sparing (geographic, nodular and perilesional or peritumoral) can cause diagnostic problems as a pseudotumor particularly in the evaluation of oncology patients. Liver MRI is used as a problem-solving tool in these patients. In this review, we discuss the current role of radiology in diagnosing, quantifying hepatic steatosis and solutions for diagnostic problems associated with fatty infiltration and sparing.European Journal of Radiology 02/2007; 61(1):33-43. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.005 · 2.16 Impact Factor