Article

Limb ischemic preconditioning induces brain ischemic tolerance via p38 MAPK.

Department of Pathophysiology, Institute of Basic Medicine, Hebei Medical University, 361 Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang 050017, PR China.
Brain Research (Impact Factor: 2.83). 05/2006; 1084(1):165-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.041
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It has been reported that limb ischemic preconditioning (LIP) could induce brain ischemic tolerance. In the present study, we investigated the role of p38 MAPK in the induction of brain ischemic tolerance by observing expression of phosphorylated p38 (p-p38) MAPK in the hippocampus after LIP and the effect of p38 MAPK inhibitor SB 203580 on the protection of LIP against delayed neuronal death (DND) in the CA1 hippocampus induced normally by brain ischemic insult. The results of Flow cytometry and Western blotting showed that expression of p-p38 MAPK initially increased at 6 h after LIP compared with sham group in the CA1 hippocampus. The increases reached peak at 12 h and lasted to 24 h after LIP. Expression of p-p38 MAPK was also increased in the CA3/dentate gyrus (DG) regions after LIP, but the beginning and peaking times were 1 and 3 days after LIP, which were relatively later than those in the CA1. Histological evaluation showed that LIP protected the CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons against DND induced by global brain ischemic insult for 8 min, suggesting the occurrence of brain ischemic tolerance. Pretreatment with SB 203580 at 30 min before LIP effectively blocked the ischemic tolerance induced by LIP. Together, it could be concluded that activation of p38 MAPK played an important role in the brain ischemic tolerance induced by LIP, and that components of the p38 MAPK cascade might be targets to modify neuronal survival in ischemic tolerance.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
93 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ischemic preconditioning has evolved as one of the most powerful strategies for cerebral protection in laboratory models of ischemia. Translating the success of laboratory studies to human cerebral protection will necessitate an approximation of laboratory conditions. This would require a practical, easily implemented method of preconditioning and clinical settings in which cerebral ischemia is anticipated, thereby allowing cerebral preconditioning prior to ischemia onset. Remote limb ischemic preconditioning is readily instituted and used in several ongoing cardiac studies for ischemic myocardial protection. It is a potentially promising intervention for brain protection as well. Suitable clinical settings, in which a preliminary study of ischemic preconditioning in neurological disorders appears feasible, include carotid endarterectomy or stenting, cardiac surgery, and subarachnoid hemorrhage with the accompanying risk of vasospasm. These are settings, in which there is substantial risk of brain ischemia, which occurs over a short and predictable period, allowing for preconditioning to be implemented prior to ischemia onset.
    Translational stroke research. 09/2010; 1(3):161-9.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ischemic postconditioning is a procedure during which intermittent reperfusions are performed in the early phase of reperfusion to protect organs from ischemia/reperfusion injury. And in this study, we mainly investigated the injury-alleviative role of mitogen-activated protein kinase-activating protein kinase-2 (MAPKAPK-2) and heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) in renal ischemic reperfusion injury during the procedure of ischemic postconditioning.
    International Urology and Nephrology 06/2014; 46(7). · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exposure of one tissue to ischemia–reperfusion confers a systemic protective effect, referred to as remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC). Confirmation that the desired effect of ischemia is occurring in tissues used to induce RIPC requires an objective demonstration before this technique can be used consistently in the clinical practice. Enrolled patients underwent three to four RIPC sessions on non-consecutive days. Sessions consisted of 4 cycles of 5 min of leg cuff inflation to 30 mmHg above the systolic blood pressure followed by reperfusion. Absence of leg pulse was confirmed by Doppler evaluation. To evaluate limb transient ischemia, patients were monitored with muscle microdialysis. Glucose, lactate, lactate/pyruvate ratio, and glycerol levels were measured. Fourteen microdialysis sessions were performed in seven patients undergoing RIPC (42.8 % male; mean age, 51.8; Fisher grade 4 in all seven patients, Hunt and Hess grade 5 in five patients, four in one patient and one in one patient). An average follow-up of 29 days demonstrated no complications associated with the procedure. Muscle microdialysis during RIPC sessions showed a significant increase in lactate/pyruvate ratio (21.2 to 26.8, p = 0.001) and lactate (3.0 to 3.9 mmol/L, p = 0.002), indicating muscle ischemia. There was no significant variation in glycerol (234 to 204 μg/L, p = 0.43), indicating no permanent cell damage. The RIPC protocol used in this study is safe, well tolerated, and induces transient metabolic changes consistent with sublethal ischemia. Muscle microdialysis can be used safely as a confirmatory tool in the induction of RIPC.
    Translational Stroke Research. 06/2012; 3(2).