Symptom-onset treatment for women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (Impact Factor: 3.76). 05/2006; 26(2):198-202. DOI: 10.1097/
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) respond to serotonin reuptake inhibitors when treatment is limited to 14 days of the menstrual cycle. Many women have less than a week of symptoms, and shorter treatment intervals would further reduce medication exposure and costs.
Twenty women with PMDD were randomly assigned to either paroxetine CR or placebo for 1 cycle and crossed over to the other condition for a second cycle. Subjects initiated treatment when premenstrual symptoms began and stopped within 3 days of beginning menses.
Women took capsules for an average of 9 days (range, 3-15 days), including the first few days of menses. Moderate "PMDD level" symptoms occurred in 1 subject (6%) for 2 days and 4 subjects (24%) for 1 day before starting paroxetine or placebo. Daily Record of Severity of Problems scores were lower in the paroxetine group compared with the placebo group, although the differences were not statistically significant. However, the mean on-treatment Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (clinician-rated) score for the paroxetine group was 17.9 +/- 8.3 compared with 31.5 +/- 11.2 in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference = 13.6, P = 0.009). Response (Clinical Global Impressions Scale score of 1 or 2) occurred in 70% of subjects randomized to paroxetine CR and 10% of those assigned to placebo (chi2(1) = 7.5, P = 0.006). Discontinuation symptoms did not differ in the groups.
These data suggest the need to further evaluate symptom-onset treatment in a larger randomized clinical trial.


Available from: Kimberly Ann Yonkers, Nov 11, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inclusion of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) into the main text of the DSM has been a point of controversy for many years. The purpose of this article is to address the main concerns raised by opponents to its inclusion. Concerns are presented and countered in turn. To identify the most prevalent arguments against inclusion of PMDD, we searched MEDLINE (1966-2012), PsycINFO (1930-2012), the Internet, and reference lists of identified articles during September 1-17, 2012, using the keywords PMDD, premenstrual syndrome (PMS), DSM, DSM-5, concerns, controversy, women, political power, workforce, courts, and history. The search was restricted to English-language publications. A total of 55 articles were identified and included. The most pressing arguments against inclusion were grouped by similarity and addressed if they were reported 5 or more times. Our review of the sources yielded 38 concerns regarding PMDD; 6 concerns were reported at least 5 times and are addressed in this article. Evidence culled from historical and legal trends does not support the alleged societal use of PMS to harm women (eg, keeping women out of the workforce or using PMS against women in child custody disputes). Further, current epidemiologic research has answered all of the methodology criticisms of opponents. Studies have confirmed the existence of PMDD worldwide. The involvement of pharmaceutical companies in research has been questioned. However, irrespective of the level of association with industry, current research on PMDD has consistent results: PMDD exists in a minority of women. Historically, the pain and suffering of women have been dismissed, minimized, and negated. Similarly, women with PMDD have often had their experience invalidated. With the preponderance of evidence in its favor, PMDD has been placed in the main text of the DSM-5, opening the door for affected women to receive the attention full diagnostic status provides.
    The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 11/2013; 75(1). DOI:10.4088/JCP.13cs08368 · 5.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a chronic condition that significantly affects a woman's well-being on a monthly basis. Although co-occurrence of PMDD and major depressive disorder (MDD) is common, most studies examine whether women with PMDD are at risk for depression and investigations of PMDD in depressed women are scant. Therefore, the present study examined rates of PMDD in young depressed women. PMDD was assessed using a structured clinical interview (SCID-PMDD) in a sample of 164 young women with (n=85) and without (n=79) any history of depression. Rates of PMDD were elevated among women with MDD in this sample. This result held true regardless of participants' MDD status (current, lifetime or past history-only symptoms of MDD) and regardless of whether all or most DSM-IV-TR PMDD criteria were met. Sample size in the present study was relatively small, and daily diary data were not available to confirm a PMDD diagnosis. The current study highlights the need for clinicians to assess for PMDD in young female patients with major depression. Depressed women experiencing the added physical and psychological burden of PMDD may have a more severe disease course, and future studies will need to identify appropriate treatments for this subset of depressed women.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 06/2013; 150(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.091 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Premenstrual dysphoria (PMD) affects 3-8 % of women in their reproductive years worldwide. This paper summarizes the studies establishing the efficacy of continuous, luteal phase, and symptom-onset dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and dual serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in treating women with PMD. The evidence indicates that for some women, symptom-onset dosing with escitalopram, fluoxetine, and paroxetine controlled release (CR) is as effective as continuous or luteal phase dosing. The wide range of clinical efficacy of SSRIs/SNRIs suggests that they exert their therapeutic effect through multiple pathways. This paper offers a few alternative mechanisms of action to explain the rapid response to SSRIs/SNRIs in women with PMD.
    CNS Drugs 06/2013; 27(8). DOI:10.1007/s40263-013-0069-7 · 4.38 Impact Factor