Estimating the intelligibility of speakers with dysarthria.

Department of Communicative Disorders and Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica (Impact Factor: 1.08). 02/2006; 58(3):217-28. DOI: 10.1159/000091735
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Many speakers with dysarthria have reduced intelligibility, and improving intelligibility is often a primary intervention objective. Consequently, measurement of intelligibility provides important information that is useful for clinical decision-making. The present study compared two different measures of intelligibility obtained in audio-only and audio-visual modalities for 4 different speakers with dysarthria (2 with mild-moderate dysarthria; 2 with severe dysarthria) secondary to cerebral palsy. A total of 80 college-aged listeners provided word-by-word transcriptions and made percent estimates of intelligibility which served as dependent variables. Group results showed that transcription measures were higher than percent estimates of intelligibility overall. There was also an interaction between speakers and measures of intelligibility, indicating that the difference between transcription scores and percent estimates varied among individual speakers. Results revealed a significant main effect for presentation modality, with the audio-visual modality having slightly higher scores than the audio-only modality; however, presentation modality did not interact with speakers or with measures of intelligibility. Results suggest that standard clinical measurement of intelligibility using orthographic transcription may be more consistent than the use of more subjective percent estimates.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Improvement or maintenance of speech intelligibility is a central aim in a whole range of conditions in speech-language therapy, both developmental and acquired. Best clinical practice and pursuance of the evidence base for interventions would suggest measurement of intelligibility form a vital role in clinical decision making and monitoring. However, what should be measured to gauge intelligibility and how this is achieved and relates to clinical planning continues to be a topic of debate. This paper considers strengths and weaknesses of selected clinical approaches to intelligibility assessment, stressing the importance of explanatory, diagnostic testing as both a more sensitive and clinically informative method. The worth of this, and any approach, is predicated, though, on awareness and control of key design, elicitation, transcription and listening/listener variables to maximise validity and reliability of assessments. These are discussed. A distinction is drawn between signal dependent and independent factors in intelligibility evaluation. Discussion broaches how these different perspectives might be reconciled to deliver comprehensive insights into intelligibility levels and their clinical/educational significance. The paper ends with a call for wider implementation of best practice around intelligibility assessment.
    International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 10/2013; · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current investigation examined the intelligibility of digitized speech recorded from typically developing child speakers, ages 4, 5, 6, and 7 years, and reproduced on an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device with digitized speech output. The study used a between group design. Forty adults were asked to transcribe 120 words spoken by child speakers in one of the age groups, and presented on an AAC device with digitized speech output. The dependent variable was intelligibility (percent of words correctly identified) of the children's speech. Overall, the intelligibility of children's speech increases with the age of the child speaker. However, there was a lot of individual variation in the intelligibility of children's voices. There was no clear cut-off age, although the speech of some young children may not be sufficiently intelligible on an AAC device that uses digitized speech. Clinicians and parents choosing child speakers for AAC devices with digitized speech are cautioned to carefully consider the speakers used for recording digitized speech output and the characteristics of the speech of the individual speaker. Future research directions are discussed.
    Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985) 09/2012; 28(3):181-9. · 0.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paucity of evidence and detail in the literature regarding speech treatment for children with dysarthria due to cerebral palsy (CP) renders it difficult for researchers to replicate studies and make further inroads into this area in need of exploration. Furthermore, for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) wishing to follow treatments that the literature indicates have promise, little guidance is available on the details of the treatments that yielded the positive results. The present article details the implementation of two treatment approaches in speech treatment research for children with dysarthria: Speech Systems Intelligibility Treatment (SSIT) and the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD (LSVT LOUD). Specific strategies, primarily for treatment, but also for outcome measurement and acoustic analysis of dysarthric speech, are described. These techniques are provided for researchers and clinicians to consider implementing in order to advance speech treatment for this population. New data from research using these approaches are presented, including findings of acoustic vowel space changes following both speech treatments.
    International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 03/2014; · 1.18 Impact Factor