A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to optimize the phase IIa development program of maraviroc

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Pfizer Clinical R and D, Groton, CT 06340, USA.
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (Impact Factor: 4.39). 07/2006; 42(2):183-91. DOI: 10.1097/01.qai.0000220021.64115.37
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To use a viral dynamics model to compare the effectiveness of in vivo viral inhibition of several doses of maraviroc (MVC;UK-427,857) and to use a modeling approach to support design decisions for a monotherapy study using various dosing regimens of maraviroc given with and without food.
The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was developed using clinical data from a first monotherapy study (study A4001007). This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of maraviroc in 44 asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients. Patients received maraviroc under food restrictions at 25 mg once daily or 50, 100, or 300 mg twice daily, or placebo for 10 days.
Antiviral responses were assessed by measuring plasma HIV-1 RNA levels during screening, during randomization, at baseline, and daily during the 10 days of treatment and at days 11 to 15, 19, 22, 25, and 40. An integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was developed using the mixed effects modeling approach with patients' pharmacokinetic profiles on the last day of treatment, HIV-1 RNA levels over time, and the individual viral susceptibility. The parameters derived from the viral dynamic model were used to calculate average viral inhibition fraction, decay rate of actively infected cells, and basic reproductive ratio for each treatment group. Monte Carlo simulation was then used to determine the distribution of viral load change across simulated patients over time for each regimen to be studied in another monotherapy study, A4001015.
The decline rate in the 300 mg twice daily group was comparable to that induced by potent protease inhibitor monotherapy, but was significantly slower than that in patients receiving combination therapy including both protease inhibitor and reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The efficacy of inhibition in vivo was estimated to range from 0.15 to 0.38 for the 25 mg once daily dose group and from 0.88 to 0.96 for the 300 mg twice daily dose group.
The model has aided the analysis and interpretation of the clinical data. The use of a model-based approach for selecting doses can accelerate drug development by replacing some arms or trials with simulations.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Modeling and simulation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic/response data has been increasingly advocated during drug development, to allow more efficient utilization of collected clinical data and to support informed decision making, e.g., regarding future study designs and dosing strategies in subpopulations. This chapter reflects the view of the Swedish Medical Products Agency, one of the European regulatory bodies, on how M&S studies contribute in the regulatory review. The availability of European guidelines related to modeling and simulation is discussed and some insight is provided into the types of recommendations given, together with a few examples.
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Efficacy exposure-response relationships of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc were evaluated across two phase III clinical trials. This post-hoc analysis used 48-week efficacy data from 841 treatment-experienced patients infected with CCR5-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), identified by the enhanced sensitivity Trofile assay. Probability of treatment success (viral RNA <50 copies/ml) was modeled using generalized additive logistic regression, testing exposure, clinical, and virologic variables. Prognostic factors for treatment success (in decreasing order of Akaike information criterion (AIC) change) were: maraviroc treatment, high-weighted overall susceptibility to background treatment, absence of an undetectable maraviroc concentration, high baseline CD4 count (BCD4), low viral load (VL), race (other than black), absence of non-R5 baseline tropism (BTRP), and absence of fosamprenavir (FPV). No concentration-response relationship was found with treatment (maraviroc vs. placebo) and presence/absence of undetectable maraviroc concentration (adherence marker) in the model. The maraviroc doses studied (300 or 150 mg with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors once (q.d.)/twice daily (b.i.d.)) deliver concentrations near the top of the concentration-response curve.CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (2013) 2, e64; doi:10.1038/psp.2013.42; published online 14 August 2013.
    08/2013; 2(8):e64. DOI:10.1038/psp.2013.42

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014