Article

Silicone rubber mould cast polyethylmethacrylate-hydroxyapatite plate used for repairing a large skull defect.

Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.61). 07/2006; 34(4):242-6. DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2006.01.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Reconstruction of the cranial vault is performed for various reasons and precise repair of the defect is important. A modified method of cranioplasty is presented using three-dimensional (3D) models and polyethylmethacrylate mixed with hydroxyapatite, cast in a silicone rubber mould.
A large custom made cranial implant was produced using data acquired from 3D computer tomography, rapid prototyping and cast in a silicone rubber mould. This plate was then applied to a 53 year-old man who had undergone a decompressive fronto-parieto-temporo-occipital craniotomy. The bone flap had been lost due to infection. The cranioplasty was performed at 1 year after the initial operation.
The cranial plate fitted precisely into the defect and needed no correction at the time of surgery. The stability of the reconstruction plate was increased by the presence of thin margins allowed by silicone rubber elasticity. No complications occurred and the final functional and aesthetic results were good.
The use of 3D imaging and rapid prototyping allow precise repair of large skull defects, with good aesthetic and functional results. At the same time, silicone rubber moulds permit the production of very thin details needed not only for cosmetic reasons but for reconstruction plate stability as well.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
220 Views
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inappropriate treatment of fractures of the frontal sinus can lead to serious complications. These fractures are often associated with soft tissue injuries and loss of bony structures. This case report shows the use of methyl methacrylate frontal prosthesis to treat a sequel of frontal sinus fracture; surgical options are discusses and one-year follow-up is present to show stability and good cosmetic result.
    International journal of burns and trauma. 01/2013; 3(4):225-231.
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cranioplasty is a common neurosurgical procedure. Free-hand molding of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement into complex three-dimensional shapes is often time-consuming and may result in disappointing cosmetic outcomes. Computer-assisted patient-specific implants address these disadvantages but are associated with long production times and high costs. In this study, we evaluated the clinical, radiological, and cosmetic outcomes of a time-saving and inexpensive intraoperative method to mold custom-made implants for immediate single-stage or delayed cranioplasty. Data were collected from patients in whom cranioplasty became necessary after removal of bone flaps affected by intracranial infection, tumor invasion, or trauma. A PMMA replica was cast between a negative form of the patient's own bone flap and the original bone flap with exactly the same shape, thickness, and dimensions. Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed 2 months post-surgery. Patient satisfaction (Odom criteria) and cosmesis (visual analogue scale for cosmesis) were evaluated 1 to 3 years after cranioplasty. Twenty-seven patients underwent intraoperative template-molded patient-specific cranioplasty with PMMA. The indications for cranioplasty included bone flap infection (56%, n = 15), calvarian tumor resection (37%, n = 10), and defect after trauma (7%, n = 2). The mean duration of the molding procedure was 19 ± 7 min. Excellent radiological implant alignment was achieved in 94% of the cases. All (n = 23) but one patient rated the cosmetic outcome (mean 1.4 years after cranioplasty) as excellent (70%, n = 16) or good (26%, n = 6). Intraoperative cast-molded reconstructive cranioplasty is a feasible, accurate, fast, and cost-efficient technique that results in excellent cosmetic outcomes, even with large and complex skull defects.
    Neurosurgical Review 03/2012; 35(4):527-35. · 1.97 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Methacrylate is a valuable tool to the neurosurgeon, even though it is currently being replaced by custom bone. During cranioplasty in the absence of custom bone, which is preformed based on the patients imaging, one has to make a cast to cover the cranial defect with or without the use of a mould. A good artificial skull outline is necessary for prevention of implant extrusion and acceptable cosmetic outcome. Using the patients head as a mould is a simple, cheap, and useful technique. An incision is made, and either a craniectomy or an attempt at skull elevation or separation of the scalp from dura is done based on the indication for the cranioplasty. The methacrylate monomer is mixed with its solvent. It is placed in between a sliced glove and then thinned out. Several layers of drapes are placed on the patients head, the acrylate which is in between the gloves is then placed on the drapes. As soon as it starts setting and the required shape obtained, it is removed and place on the sterile tray. It is then anchored and the wound closed. This technique produces good cosmetic outcome. However, the head must be properly protected from the risk of burns from the exothermic reaction. The technique is described in a 40-year-old driver who had a compound depressed skull fracture. He had a methylmethacrylate cranioplasty in the 9(th) week post trauma after allowing for wound healing. We recommend that this technique may be used in centers where custom bone is either too expensive or not available during cranioplasty in order to obtain a good outcome.
    Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. 01/2013; 4(4):471-474.

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
331 Downloads
Available from
Nov 28, 2012