Status of Credentialing Alternative Providers Within a Subset of U.S. Academic Health Centers

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.59). 05/2006; 12(3):329-35. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2006.12.329
Source: PubMed


Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) clinical services are increasingly provided within conventional health care settings.
To determine how a subset of U.S. academic health centers is credentialing CAM providers.
An electronic survey was created focusing on the credentialing method utilized for six specific types of CAM clinical practitioners within academic medical settings.
This survey was electronically distributed to 33 academic health centers in the United States during the summer 2004.
Ninety-five percent (95%) of academic centers surveyed provide some CAM clinical care. Acupuncture and massage are most common, with naturopathy and homeopathy least common. State licensure requirements for CAM providers appear to not be well-understood. Most commonly, CAM professionals do not receive full medical staff credentials.
Results cannot be extrapolated to remaining academic health centers within the United States. Mind-body practitioners were not included in the survey.
Credentialing and privileges are most commonly granted via indirect methods. Variability in state licensure compounds the challenge of credentialing CAM practitioners. Suggestions for beginning discussions on guiding principles for integrating CAM practitioners within conventional settings are proposed.

5 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acupuncture as a therapeutic modality offers multiple applications. Its effectiveness coupled with its general acceptance by conventional health care professionals makes it one of the first complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) modalities to be incorporated in an integrative approach to care. However, few centers that offer acupuncture have written standard policies to regulate its use. This lack of standard policies may impede provision of quality care, serve as a barrier to cross-institutional data collection and clinical application of that data, and may put health care professionals and institutions at risk when credentialing or malpractice liability has not been clearly addressed. Here we present a policy for acupuncture, created by a diverse group of health care professionals at the University of Michigan Health System. It may function as a generalizable template for standard policy development by institutions incorporating acupuncture.
    The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 01/2007; 12(10):1035-9. DOI:10.1089/acm.2006.12.1035 · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Massage is the most common complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapy used in hospitals in the United States. As such, it is often the first CAM therapy to be integrated with conventional medicine. However, few academic medical centers have a written standard policy to guide this integration. This lack of standard policy may impede institutions from offering massage therapy as a clinical service, and may put health care professionals and institutions at risk through a failure to clearly address criteria for practice credentials or malpractice liability. To create a clinical policy for therapeutic massage that may be used as a template for development of policy in academic health centers. We present a clinical policy for therapeutic massage, developed by the University of Michigan Health System, that defines therapeutic massage, provides guidelines for the credentialing and professional conduct of massage therapists, lists indications and contraindications for therapeutic massage, and addresses malpractice in accordance with the specific culture and needs of academic health centers. This policy was created by health care professionals after review of existing evidence and consideration of national criteria for massage therapy. This policy is intended to be used as a template for the development of a standard policy for therapeutic massage by health system administrators, medical directors, and massage professionals, to support the integration of therapeutic massage within their institutions. With minor modifications of this policy by individual institutions, adoption of this policy may facilitate the thoughtful integration of this CAM therapy into academic health care settings, meeting the unique requirements of academic health care institutions while serving the needs of patients.
    The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 06/2007; 13(4):471-5. DOI:10.1089/acm.2007.6323 · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An effort to increase the understanding of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by health care professionals requires an interdisciplinary and collaborative approach. Between 2000 and 2002, National Institutes of Health National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine funded 15 educational institutions to develop curricular models for educating allopathic medical and nursing learners in CAM literacy. Four of these 15 programs, Tufts University School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University School of Medicine, and University of Washington School of Nursing, formed collaborative partnerships with nearby academic institutions that train CAM practitioners. This article focuses on these four examples of institutional collaboration, summarizing the challenges faced and the positive outcomes achieved for learners, faculty, and institutions. As collaborations between such institutions increase, future potential directions for consideration include credentialing of CAM practitioners teaching within allopathic health professional institutions, faculty development within existing allopathic health professional schools on incorporating evidence-based CAM content into their standard allopathic education, and viewing CAM as an aspect of cultural sensitivity.
    Academic Medicine 10/2007; 82(10):962-6. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31814a4e2c · 2.93 Impact Factor
Show more