Improving Hospital Systems for the Care of Women With Major Obstetric Hemorrhage

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anesthesiology, and Quality Management, New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens, Flushing, New York 11355, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 5.18). 06/2006; 107(5):977-83. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000215561.68257.c5
Source: PubMed


When 2 maternal deaths due to hemorrhage occurred at New York Hospital Queens in 2000-2001, a multidisciplinary team implemented systemic change. Our objective was to improve outcomes of episodes of major obstetric hemorrhage.
We report outcomes before (2000-2001) and after (2002-2005) the introduction of a patient safety program aimed at improving the care of women with major obstetric hemorrhage. Process changes were instituted in late 2001 at the direction of a multidisciplinary patient safety team. A rapid response team was formulated using the cardiac arrest team as a model. Protocols for early diagnosis, assessment, and management of patients at high risk for major obstetric hemorrhage were developed and communicated to staff.
There were significant increases in cesarean births (P < .001), repeat cesarean births (P = .002), and cases of major obstetric hemorrhage (P = .02) between the periods of 2000-2001 and 2002-2005. There was a significant improvement in mortality due to hemorrhage (P = .036), lowest pH (P = .004), and lowest temperature (P < .001) when comparing 2000-2001 with 2002-2005. There were no differences in measures of severity of obstetric hemorrhage between the 2 periods, including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, occurrence of placenta accreta and estimated blood loss.
Despite a significant increase in major obstetric hemorrhage cases, we found improved outcomes and fewer maternal deaths after implementing systemic approaches to improve patient safety. Attention to improving the hospital systems necessary for the care of women at risk for major obstetric hemorrhage is important in the effort to decrease maternal mortality from hemorrhage.

12 Reads
  • Source
    • "[5] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Leimyomatosis peritonealis disseminata (LPD) is a benign tumor of smooth muscle tissue. It is rare and is characterized by the development of multiple peritoneal nodules mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis. We report a case of LPD diagnosed in a 35-year-old patient, G4/P1, without any major gynecological history. The patient underwent an elective cesarean section at 42 weeks, during which numerous peritoneal nodules ranging in size from 0.1 to 0.5 cm were found. Microscopic examination showed a proliferation of smooth-muscle cells without mitosis or atypia or necrosis.
    Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 01/2012; 39(4):541-3. · 0.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "[5] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endometrial osseous metaplasia is a rare clinical entity. It causes infertility and occurs in more than 80% of cases after an abortion. Various theories have been proposed and the most accepted theory is metaplasia of the stromal cells into osteoblastic cells that produce bone. This disease may be misdiagnosed. However once diagnosed, the complete removal of bone spicules by hysteroscopy allows, in most cases, fertility to be restored. We present the case of a 36-year-old patient nulliparous with a history of abortion for eight years who consulted May 5, 2008 to become pregnant. Detailed examination showed chronic endometritis with bone metaplasia as a possible cause of her infertility. Seven months after complete removal of bone fragments by hysteroscopy, the patient had a spontaneous pregnancy with normal development. She gave birth to a male infant weighing 3,000 g with an Apgar score of 9 at 1 and 5 min. Delivery and postpartum were normal.
    Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 01/2012; 39(4):559-61. · 0.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Limitations of the reporting of the studies included sparse information about the control sites, potential differences of baseline measurement, and lack of information about data collection processes and tools. Most studies used uncontrolled study designs (n = 76): before-and-after case series (n = 29) [12,22,28-32,57,63,65,71-74,79,80,87-91,98,99,103-106,109,115], historically controlled (n = 6) [33-36,86,92], and descriptive (i.e., cross-sectional, correlational, survey, case-report; n = 36) [44-49,52-55,58,60-62,66-68,70,76-78,81,83,93-97,100,101,107,108,110,111,114,116]. Five were qualitative-descriptive or mixed methods [25,50,51,59,69]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review of the literature about the establishment and impact of quality and safety team initiatives in acute care. Studies were identified through electronic searches of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ABI Inform, Cochrane databases. Grey literature and bibliographies were also searched. Qualitative or quantitative studies that occurred in acute care, describing how quality and safety teams were established or implemented, the impact of teams, or the barriers and/or facilitators of teams were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study design, sample, interventions, and outcomes. Quality assessment of full text articles was done independently by two reviewers. Studies were categorized according to dimensions of quality. Of 6,674 articles identified, 99 were included in the study. The heterogeneity of studies and results reported precluded quantitative data analyses. Findings revealed limited information about attributes of successful and unsuccessful team initiatives, barriers and facilitators to team initiatives, unique or combined contribution of selected interventions, or how to effectively establish these teams. Not unlike systematic reviews of quality improvement collaboratives, this broad review revealed that while teams reported a number of positive results, there are many methodological issues. This study is unique in utilizing traditional quality assessment and more novel methods of quality assessment and reporting of results (SQUIRE) to appraise studies. Rigorous design, evaluation, and reporting of quality and safety team initiatives are required.
    Implementation Science 08/2011; 6(1):97. DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-6-97 · 4.12 Impact Factor
Show more