Article

Prediction of the 10-year course of borderline personality disorder

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.56). 06/2006; 163(5):827-32. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.5.827
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to determine the most clinically relevant baseline predictors of time to remission for patients with borderline personality disorder.
A total of 290 inpatients meeting criteria for both the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines and DSM-III-R for borderline personality disorder were assessed during their index admission with a series of semistructured interviews and self-report measures. Diagnostic status was reassessed at five contiguous 2-year time periods. Discrete survival analytic methods, which controlled for baseline severity of borderline psychopathology and time, were used to estimate hazard ratios.
Eighty-eight percent of the patients with borderline personality disorder studied achieved remission. In terms of time to remission, 39.3% of the 242 patients who experienced a remission of their disorder first remitted by their 2-year follow-up, an additional 22.3% first remitted by their 4-year follow-up, an additional 21.9% by their 6-year follow-up, an additional 12.8% by their 8-year follow-up, and another 3.7% by their 10-year follow-up. Sixteen variables were found to be significant bivariate predictors of earlier time to remission. Seven of these remained significant in multivariate analyses: younger age, absence of childhood sexual abuse, no family history of substance use disorder, good vocational record, absence of an anxious cluster personality disorder, low neuroticism, and high agreeableness.
The results of this study suggest that prediction of time to remission from borderline personality disorder is multifactorial in nature, involving factors that are routinely assessed in clinical practice and factors, particularly aspects of temperament, that are not.

0 Followers
 · 
74 Views
  • Source
    Neuropsychiatrie de l Enfance et de l Adolescence 07/2012; 60(5):S146-S147. DOI:10.1016/j.neurenf.2012.04.143
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This pilot study evaluated a manualized group forgiveness module within dialectical behavior therapy (DBT). The study utilized a quasi-experimental double pretest design with adults (N = 40; 88.1% female, 11.9% male) diagnosed with borderline personality disorder in outpatient DBT. Measures of forgiveness, attachment, and psychiatric symptoms were completed at 4 time points. Participants showed increases in all measures of forgiveness and decreases in attachment insecurity and psychiatric symptoms during the forgiveness module and maintained to the 6-week follow-up. These effects were not observed during the prior distress tolerance module. Latent change score modeling showed reductions in anxious attachment mediated the effect of changes in benevolent motivations to forgive and trait forgiveness scores on reductions in psychiatric symptoms. Effect sizes were similar to meta-analytic findings on (a) forgiveness interventions and (b) reductions in psychiatric symptoms in DBT. Participant feedback suggested elements for further development. A randomized controlled trial is needed. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Journal of Clinical Psychology 04/2015; DOI:10.1002/jclp.22185 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aunque continúa siendo motivo de debate, casi sin ninguna duda el pronóstico de los trastornos depresivos se agrava con la presencia de un trastorno comórbido de la personalidad. Este hallazgo es intuitivo pero no aceptado por todos los investigadores que trabajan en este campo. En parte, esto podría deberse a las dificultades en el diseño y la interpretación de los estudios de investigación sobre ambos procesos, las dificultades para evaluar transversalmente los trastornos de la personalidad en relación con la depresión, la naturaleza variable tanto de la depresión como los trastornos de la personalidad y los factores etiológicos similares para ambos procesos. A esto se debe añadir que este pronóstico más desfavorable se observa con independencia del tipo de intervención utilizada para tratar la depresión. No se dispone de estudios que hayan examinado programas de tratamiento específico para ambos procesos, instaurados de forma paralela, lo que dificulta la separación de los efectos del tratamiento de los trastornos depresivos de los marcadores de rasgo de los pacientes. El tratamiento de pacientes con comorbilidades requiere una estrategia terapéutica diseñada individualmente que tenga en cuenta la gravedad de cada entidad y su influencia en la función social y la psicopatología. La depresión ha de tratarse de manera agresiva y es probable que las intervenciones específicas dirigidas a la influencia del trastorno de la personalidad se traduzcan en mejoras. Puede ser que la duración del tratamiento tenga que ser más prolongada, al igual que en el caso de numerosos procesos duales. Es necesario realizar investigaciones que clarifiquen la interrelación de ambos procesos. Las claras diferencias en las clasificaciones clínicas actuales y los marcos de tiempo de ambos procesos, en comparación con los hallazgos de investigación hasta la fecha, dificultan esta investigación.
    12/2008; 15(6):223-227. DOI:10.1016/S1134-5934(08)76495-9