On racial diversity and group decision making: identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations.

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 05/2006; 90(4):597-612. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.597
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This research examines the multiple effects of racial diversity on group decision making. Participants deliberated on the trial of a Black defendant as members of racially homogeneous or heterogeneous mock juries. Half of the groups were exposed to pretrial jury selection questions about racism and half were not. Deliberation analyses supported the prediction that diverse groups would exchange a wider range of information than all-White groups. This finding was not wholly attributable to the performance of Black participants, as Whites cited more case facts, made fewer errors, and were more amenable to discussion of racism when in diverse versus all-White groups. Even before discussion, Whites in diverse groups were more lenient toward the Black defendant, demonstrating that the effects of diversity do not occur solely through information exchange. The influence of jury selection questions extended previous findings that blatant racial issues at trial increase leniency toward a Black defendant.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A total of 35 African American men who were wrongly convicted of sexual assault against Whites were identified through review of journalist, scholarly, Web-based, and published legal decisions. Most of the cases occurred during the 1982–1992 decade and involved postconviction DNA exonerations. Consistent with the literature on wrongful convictions, erroneous eyewitness identification by the assault victim was a major source of error. Other factors that contributed to the wrongful convictions were coerced false confessions, all-White juries, discounted alibis, misconduct by officials, flawed expert testimony, and hue-and-cry circumstances. The construction of the image of the Black sexual predator as well as the challenges presented by cross-racial identification also are discussed.
    Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 10/2013; 11(4):277-294.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As work organizations become increasingly gender diverse, existing theoretical models have failed to explain why such diversity can have a negative impact on idea generation. Using evidence from two group experiments, this paper tests theory on the effects of imposing a political correctness (PC) norm, one that sets clear expectations for how men and women should interact, on reducing interaction uncertainty and boosting creativity in mixed-sex groups. Our research shows that men and women both experience uncertainty when asked to generate ideas as members of a mixed-sex work group: men because they may fear offending the women in the group and women because they may fear having their ideas devalued or rejected. Most group creativity research begins with the assumption that creativity is unleashed by removing normative con-straints, but our results show that the PC norm promotes rather than sup-presses the free expression of ideas by reducing the uncertainty experienced by both sexes in mixed-sex work groups and signaling that the group is predict-able enough to risk sharing more—and more-novel—ideas. Our results demon-strate that the PC norm, which is often maligned as a threat to free speech, may play an important role in promoting gender parity at work by allowing demographically heterogeneous work groups to more freely exchange creative ideas.
    Administrative Science Quarterly 03/2015; · 4.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Markets are central to modern society, so their failures can be devastating. Here, we examine a prominent failure: price bubbles. Bubbles emerge when traders err collectively in pricing, causing misfit between market prices and the true values of assets. The causes of such collective errors remain elusive. We propose that bubbles are affected by ethnic homogeneity in the market and can be thwarted by diversity. In homogenous markets, traders place undue confidence in the decisions of others. Less likely to scrutinize others' decisions, traders are more likely to accept prices that deviate from true values. To test this, we constructed experimental markets in Southeast Asia and North America, where participants traded stocks to earn money. We randomly assigned participants to ethnically homogeneous or diverse markets. We find a marked difference: Across markets and locations, market prices fit true values 58% better in diverse markets. The effect is similar across sites, despite sizeable differences in culture and ethnic composition. Specifically, in homogenous markets, overpricing is higher as traders are more likely to accept speculative prices. Their pricing errors are more correlated than in diverse markets. In addition, when bubbles burst, homogenous markets crash more severely. The findings suggest that price bubbles arise not only from individual errors or financial conditions, but also from the social context of decision making. The evidence may inform public discussion on ethnic diversity: it may be beneficial not only for providing variety in perspectives and skills, but also because diversity facilitates friction that enhances deliberation and upends conformity.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 11/2014; · 9.81 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Available from