On racial diversity and group decision-making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 05/2006; 90(4):597-612. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.597
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This research examines the multiple effects of racial diversity on group decision making. Participants deliberated on the trial of a Black defendant as members of racially homogeneous or heterogeneous mock juries. Half of the groups were exposed to pretrial jury selection questions about racism and half were not. Deliberation analyses supported the prediction that diverse groups would exchange a wider range of information than all-White groups. This finding was not wholly attributable to the performance of Black participants, as Whites cited more case facts, made fewer errors, and were more amenable to discussion of racism when in diverse versus all-White groups. Even before discussion, Whites in diverse groups were more lenient toward the Black defendant, demonstrating that the effects of diversity do not occur solely through information exchange. The influence of jury selection questions extended previous findings that blatant racial issues at trial increase leniency toward a Black defendant.

  • Source
    • "A clear hierarchy might ordinarily reduce status uncertainty in mixed-sex groups, but many brainstorming groups intentionally lack such a formal structure. The PC norm may boost performance most in brainstorming work groups because such groups are less structured than, for example, decision-making groups that typically have formal rules and procedures governing interactions and information exchange (Sommers, 2006). In addition, unlike with decision-making groups, in which an optimal solution is more likely to exist, the evaluation of creative ideas is subjective and unpredictable (Goncalo, Flynn, and Kim, 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As work organizations become increasingly gender diverse, existing theoretical models have failed to explain why such diversity can have a negative impact on idea generation. Using evidence from two group experiments, this paper tests theory on the effects of imposing a political correctness (PC) norm, one that sets clear expectations for how men and women should interact, on reducing interaction uncertainty and boosting creativity in mixed-sex groups. Our research shows that men and women both experience uncertainty when asked to generate ideas as members of a mixed-sex work group: men because they may fear offending the women in the group and women because they may fear having their ideas devalued or rejected. Most group creativity research begins with the assumption that creativity is unleashed by removing normative con-straints, but our results show that the PC norm promotes rather than sup-presses the free expression of ideas by reducing the uncertainty experienced by both sexes in mixed-sex work groups and signaling that the group is predict-able enough to risk sharing more—and more-novel—ideas. Our results demon-strate that the PC norm, which is often maligned as a threat to free speech, may play an important role in promoting gender parity at work by allowing demographically heterogeneous work groups to more freely exchange creative ideas.
    Administrative Science Quarterly 03/2015; 60(1). DOI:10.1177/0001839214563975 · 4.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "2. The SCB could implement diversity training and accountability for the diversity plan at leadership levels, including the board and within the executive office. In a study of group decision making, diverse groups that underwent diversity training outperformed nondiverse groups (Sommers 2006), and research suggests further improvement with training within diverse groups (Page 2007; Sommers 2008). Diversity training programs and broader diversity plans work best when a specific intra-organizational entity is held responsible for results (Williams & "
    Conservation Biology 11/2013; 28(1). DOI:10.1111/cobi.12182 · 4.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Diversity can be tremendously rewarding. Exposure to racial diversity has many positive outcomes, including improved racial attitudes (Astin 1993, Shook & Fazio, 2008), better leadership development (Antonio, 2001), and more complex thinking about the social world (Antonio et al., 2004; Sommers, 2006; Sommers, Warp, & Mahoney, 2008). In the words of former President Bill Clinton, diversity can be a " Godsend " for those who can " live together, learn together, work together " (1997). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many White Americans are concerned about appearing prejudiced. How these concerns affect responses during actual interracial interactions, however, remains understudied. The present work examines stress responses to interracial contact-both in the moment, during interracial interactions (Study 1), and over time as individuals have repeated interracial contact (Study 2). Results of Study 1 revealed that concerns about appearing prejudiced were associated with heightened stress responses during interracial encounters (Study 1). White participants concerned about appearing prejudiced exhibited significant increases in cortisol "stress hormone" levels as well as increases in anxious behavior during interracial but not same-race contact. Participants relatively unconcerned about appearing prejudiced did not exhibit these stress responses. Study 2 examined stress responses to interracial contact over an entire academic year. Results revealed that White participants exhibited shifts in cortisol diurnal rhythms on days after interracial contact. Moreover, participants' cortisol rhythms across the academic year, from fall to spring, were related to their concerns about appearing prejudiced and their interracial contact experiences. Taken together, these data offer the first evidence that chronic concerns about appearing prejudiced are related to short- and longer-term stress responses to interracial contact. Implications for life in diverse spaces are discussed.
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 05/2012; 48(3):682-693. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.003 · 2.22 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview (2 Sources)

Available from