Article

Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Plastic and reconstructive surgery (Impact Factor: 2.74). 06/2006; 117(6):1769-80. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000209971.08264.b0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Suture knots present several disadvantages in wound closure, because they are tedious to tie and place ischemic demands on tissue. Bulky knots may be a nidus for infection, and they may extrude through skin weeks after surgery. Needle manipulations during knot-tying predispose the surgeon to glove perforation. A barbed suture was developed that is self-anchoring, requiring no knots or slack management for wound closure. The elimination of knot tying may have advantages over conventional wound closure methods.
This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was designed to show that the use of barbed suture in dermal closure of the Pfannenstiel incision during nonemergent cesarean delivery surgery produces scar cosmesis at 5 weeks that is no worse than that observed with conventional closure using 3-0 polydioxanone suture. Cosmesis was assessed by review of postoperative photographs by a blinded, independent plastic surgeon using the modified Hollander cosmesis score. Secondary endpoints included infection, dehiscence, pain, closure time, and other adverse events.
The study enrolled 195 patients, of whom 188 were eligible for analysis. Cosmesis scores did not significantly differ between the barbed suture group and the control group. Rates of infection, dehiscence, and other adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups. Closure time and pain scores were comparable between the groups.
The barbed suture represents an innovative option for wound closure. With a cosmesis and safety profile that is similar to that of conventional suture technique, it avoids the drawbacks inherent to suture knots.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
70 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Various suture materials have been used for tendon repair. Barbed suture in particular has been demonstrated to be effective for both wound closure and tendon repair. Ten fresh-frozen flexor digitorum profundus tendons of pig were transected and repaired using the two-strand modified Kirchmayr-Kessler technique. The samples were divided into two groups: 4-0 barbed absorbable polyglyconate sutures and 4-0 monofilament absorbable polyglyconate sutures. We measured tensile strength and distance that the testing system pulled the tendon using a universal testing machine. Tensile strength at which 1 and 2 mm of gapping occurred was measured visually at the repair site. Tendons repaired by barbed sutures showed greater tensile strength than monofilament sutures forming still 2-mm gap. However, statistical significance was obtained only at 1-mm gap formation. We concluded that for tendon repair, barbed sutures were superior material to monofilament sutures because of their greater tensile strength, reducing both the initial tendon load and the risk of dehiscence.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 10/2013; · 0.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot tying for anastomosis are considered the most difficult laparoscopic skills to master. The aim of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of barbed suture for intestinal sutures to close the gastrojejunal anastomosis in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. Study Design: All consecutive patients undergoing gastric bypass were screened for enrollment in our study. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo knotless anastomosis with barbed suture (V-Loc™ 180; Covidien, Mansfield, MA) (case group) or knot-tying anastomosis with 3/0 polyglactin sutures (Polysorb(®); Covidien) (control group). The primary outcome was the time needed for the gastrojejunal anastomosis and the operative time. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of leak, bleeding, and stenosis and the evaluation of the cost of the different procedures evaluated. Results: Among the 60 consecutive patients enrolled in our study, 30 underwent knot-tying anastomosis, and 30 underwent knotless anastomosis. The time needed for the anastomosis was significantly less (P<.001) in the knotless group, whereas no significant differences were found between the two groups for operative time (P=.151). We recorded one leak in the control group and one leak in the case group (P=1.000). One bleeding in the case group (P=1.000) and no stenosis in either group was recorded. Finally, in our experience, the knotless anastomosis was cheaper than the knot-tying anastomosis (P<.001). Conclusions: Our study appears to be encouraging to suggest the use of barbed suture for gastrointestinal anastomosis.
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 07/2013; · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Barbed sutures provide a novel technique for knotless wound closure. They have mainly been used in plastic and general surgery. There are no reports about its use in the foot. We present a case series of 11 feet in 8 patients whose wounds were closed with barbed sutures. Ten had primary hallux valgus correction and one had a revision correction. No problems were noted at 2-weeks follow-up. Four of the 11 cases required open suture excision due to an adverse reaction. Five were followed to delayed wound healing. Histology results from one scar showed a localised histiocytic reaction and superficial dermal abscess formation. We feel the thin subcutaneous tissue of the foot, the amount of motion and pressure from the shoe causes the barbs to repeatedly irritate the soft tissue. Based on our short case series we cannot recommend the use of a barbed skin closure system in the foot.
    Foot and Ankle Surgery 06/2013; 19(2):131-4.