A pharmacogenetic exploration of vigabatrin-induced visual field constriction.

Peter Kinirons, Gianpiero L Cavalleri, Rinki Singh, Amre Shahwan, James F Acheson, Nicholas W Wood, David B Goldstein, Sanjay M Sisodiya, Colin P Doherty, Norman Delanty

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons, Division of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Journal Article: Epilepsy Research (impact factor: 2.48). 09/2006; 70(2-3):144-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2006.03.012

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Use of the antiepileptic drug (AED) vigabatrin is severely limited by irreversible visual field constriction, an adverse reaction to the drug reported in approximately 40% of patients. Given the evidence suggesting an idiosyncratic drug response, we set out to detect genetic variation of strong, clinically relevant effect that might guide clinicians in the safe, controlled prescribing of this otherwise usefuldrug. METHODS: Patients with a history of at least 1-year exposure to vigabatrin were enrolled at two independent referral centers. Using Goldmann perimetry, visual fields and the extent of constriction were calculated for each patient. We examined the correlation between the extent of vigabatrin induced visual field constriction and genetic variation across six candidate genes (SLC6A1, SLC6A13, SCL6A11, ABAT, GABRR1 and GABRR2). We availed of HapMap data and used a tagging SNP technique in an effort to efficiently capture all common variation within these genes. We attempted to replicate any positive associations before drawing conclusions from our results. RESULTS: The degree of visual field constriction correlated with three SNPs and one haplotype in a cohort of 73 patients. However we were unable to replicate these findings in a second independent cohort consisting of 58 patients, suggesting the initial results were possibly false positives, or variants of weak effect. CONCLUSION: Common variants of strong, clinically relevant effect do not appear to reside in the candidate genes studied here. This does not rule out the presence of genetic variants of weak effect in these genes, nor of variants of strong effect in other genes.

Source: PubMed

Comments on this publication

ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!

Similar publications

Science & Research Jobs

Keywords

58 patients
 
73 patients
 
adverse reaction
 
antiepileptic drug
 
clinically relevant effect
 
Common variants
 
genetic variants
 
HapMap data
 
idiosyncratic drug response
 
independent referral centers
 
initial results
 
irreversible visual field constriction
 
Patients
 
positive associations
 
second independent cohort
 
strong effect
 
tagging SNP technique
 
visual field constriction correlated
 
visual fields
 
weak effect