Article

Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol.

Center of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Ludwig-Boltzmann Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Physics in Medicine and Biology (Impact Factor: 2.92). 06/2006; 51(10):N205-10. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/N01
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This note uses a published protocol to evaluate a newly released 6 degrees of freedom electromagnetic tracking system (Aurora, Northern Digital Inc.). A practice for performance monitoring over time is also proposed. The protocol uses a machined base plate to measure relative error in position and orientation as well as the influence of metallic objects in the operating volume. Positional jitter (E(RMS)) was found to be 0.17 mm +/- 0.19 mm. A relative positional error of 0.25 mm +/- 0.22 mm at 50 mm offsets and 0.97 mm +/- 1.01 mm at 300 mm offsets was found. The mean of the relative rotation error was found to be 0.20 degrees +/- 0.14 degrees with respect to the axial and 0.91 degrees +/- 0.68 degrees for the longitudinal rotation. The most significant distortion caused by metallic objects is caused by 400-series stainless steel. A 9.4 mm maximum error occurred when the rod was closest to the emitter, 10 mm away. The improvement compared to older generations of the Aurora with respect to accuracy is substantial.

1 Bookmark
 · 
148 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A navigation system for flexible endoscopes equipped with ultrasound (US) scan heads is presented. In contrast to similar systems, abdominal 3D-US is used for image fusion of the pre-interventional computed tomography (CT) to the endoscopic US. A 3D-US scan, tracked with an optical tracking system (OTS), is taken pre-operatively together with the CT scan. The CT is calibrated using the OTS, providing the transformation from CT to 3D-US. Immediately before intervention a 3D-US tracked with an electromagnetic tracking system (EMTS) is acquired and registered intra-modal to the preoperative 3D-US. The endoscopic US is calibrated using the EMTS and registered to the pre-operative CT by an intra-modal 3D-US/3D-US registration. Phantom studies showed a registration error for the US to CT registration of 5.1 mm ± 2.8 mm. 3D-US/3D-US registration of patient data gave an error of 4.1 mm compared to 2.8 mm with the phantom. From this we estimate an error on patient experiments of 5.6 mm.
    Physics in Medicine and Biology 08/2014; 59(18):5545. · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the precision of optical and electromagnetic navigation systems in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We retrospectively reviewed 60 patients who underwent TKA using an optical navigation system and 60 patients who underwent TKA using an electromagnetic navigation system from June 2010 to March 2012. The mechanical axis that was measured on preoperative radiographs and by the intraoperative navigation systems were compared between the groups. The postoperative positions of the femoral and tibial components in the sagittal and coronal plane were assessed. The difference of the mechanical axis measured on the preoperative radiograph and by the intraoperative navigation systems was 0.6 degrees more varus in the electromagnetic navigation system group than in the optical navigation system group, but showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). The positions of the femoral and tibial components in the sagittal and coronal planes on the postoperative radiographs also showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). In TKA, both optical and electromagnetic navigation systems showed high accuracy and reproducibility, and the measurements from the postoperative radiographs showed no significant difference between the two groups.
    Knee surgery & related research. 12/2014; 26(4):214-221.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a therapeutic medical procedure that stimulates the sacral nerve using an electrode inserted near the sacral nerve to treat the conditions of overactive bladder and fecal incontinence. The primary challenge in the SNS procedure is that the physician inserts a needle to place an electrode through the narrow structure of the sacrum while relying on fluoroscopic images. We developed a navigation system which relies on an off-the-shelf electromagnetic tracking device, preoperative CT images, and a graphical user interface for needle insertion. Subjects inserted the needle into targets in a free metallic environment and in a surgical environment with a sacral phantom model. The mean registration error in four trials was 0.90±0.081 mm in the free metallic environment and 1.16±0.49 mm in the surgical environment. The mean user error (UE) between the needle tip position and a target was 5.08±1.27 mm in the free metallic environment and 4.26±2.87 mm in the surgical environment. We believe that our navigation system has potential to improve clinical sacral nerve stimulation treatment considerably. To support clinical application of this method, several remaining issues pertaining to the developed navigation system in an in vivo environment must be resolved.
    International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 11/2013; 14(11):2015-2020. · 1.50 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
60 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014