Innovative approaches to obtaining community feedback in the Witness for Wellness experience.

Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Neuropsychiatric Institute, Health Services Research Center, University of California at Los Angeles, USA.
Ethnicity & disease (Impact Factor: 0.92). 02/2006; 16(1 Suppl 1):S35-42.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Awareness of the need for innovative approaches to obtaining feedback in community-based participatory research (CBPR) is increasing. These innovative approaches should incorporate the core principles of CBPR, including equity and co-learning. Additionally, the methods should be culturally appropriate and inclusive of the community and academic partners.
To develop and implement two separate methods of obtaining community feedback for two activities in a CBPR initiative: 1) discussion of three work-group plans during a leadership council meeting; and 2) feedback from the work groups to the target community in a public setting.
In order to facilitate a feedback process for the discussion of 3 separate group action plans, an adapted version of the modified Delphi technique was used during which 42 community and academic partners voted and evaluated each plan both before and after group discussion. Results were immediately posted on a projection screen for the group to process. The second community feedback method incorporated the use of an audience response system (ARS) in order to obtain responses from 187 community participants after hearing summaries of the Witness for Wellness work-group action plans. More than 60% of the respondents added that the use of the handheld device made research seem more relevant and less intimidating.
Both the use of the adapted modified Delphi process and ARS were effective in capturing community feedback related to two group activities in the Witness for Wellness initiative. Both methods also allowed participants to understand the role of research in a community setting.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The New York University- New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (NYU-HHC) Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) and consensus-building approach among its community advisory board (CAB) and steering committee (SC) members to formulate research priorities to foster shared research collaborations. Methods: The Delphi technique is a methodology used to generate consensus from diverse perspectives and organizational agendas through a multi-method, iterative approach to collecting data. A series of on-line surveys was conducted with CAB members to identify health and research priorities from the community perspective. Subsequently, CAB and SC members were brought together and the snow card approach was utilized to narrow to two priority areas for shared research collaborations. Results: Cardiovascular disease (CVD)/obesity and mental health were identified as health disparity areas for shared research collaborations within a social determinants framework. In response, two workgroups were formed with leadership provided by three co-chairs representing the three constituents of the NYU-HHC CTSI: NYU faculty, HHC providers, and community leaders Conclusions: The Delphi approach fostered ownership and engagement with community partners because it was an iterative process that required stakeholders' input into decision making. The snow card technique allowed for organizing of a large number of discrete ideas. Results have helped to inform the overall CTSI research agenda by defining action steps, and setting an organizing framework to tackle two health disparity areas. The process helped ensure that NYUHHC CTSI research and community engagement strategies are congruent with community priorities.
    Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action 01/2013; 7(3):331-9. DOI:10.1353/cpr.2013.0033
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Awareness of the impact of disasters globally on mental health is increasing. Known difficulties in preparing communities for disasters and a lack of focus on relationship building and organizational capacity in preparedness and response have led to a greater policy focus on community resiliency as a key public health approach to disaster response. In this article, the authors describe how an approach to community engagement for improving mental health services, disaster recovery, and preparedness from a community resiliency perspective emerged from their work in applying a partnered, participatory research framework, iteratively, in Los Angeles County and the City of New Orleans.
    The Psychiatric clinics of North America 09/2013; 36(3):451-466. DOI:10.1016/j.psc.2013.05.002 · 1.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: "Community Partners in Care (CPIC): Video Summary of Rationale, Study Approach / Implementation, and Client 6-month Outcomes" is a 2 minute, 46 second video summarizing the study rationale, study approach, and the 6-month outcomes. The video was produced by four agencies: Healthy African American Families II, a health advocacy organization in South Los Angeles; Behavioral Health Services, the largest substance/alcohol abuse service provider in LA County; UCLA; and RAND Health; contract filmmakers Eileen Cabiling and Joe Mango handled cinematography, editing, and video support. The individuals appearing in the video are key CPIC community and academic partners. The celebratory tone of the video is consistent with a Community Partnered Participatory Research approach, a local variant of participatory action research, where study findings are celebrated by the partners, and dissemination efforts include approaches intended for general audiences, especially from low-income, low-literacy, minority communities, in addition to traditional academic products like peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts. The CPIC video offers a community perspective on the study results to our partners, the general public, other scientists and policy makers. We designed the video to teach community and healthcare partners how to adapt and implement the CPIC depression care model and to offer other community -academic partnerships an example of a non-traditional product developed for dissemination from an NIH-funded research study.


Available from