Comparison of fixed flexion, fluoroscopic semi-flexed and MTP radiographic methods for obtaining the minimum medial joint space width of the knee in longitudinal osteoarthritis trials

Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (Impact Factor: 4.17). 02/2006; 14 Suppl A:A32-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.02.023
Source: PubMed


To compare three radiographic techniques (fluoroscopic semi-flexed [Fluoro], fixed flexion [FF], and semi-flexed metatarsophalangeal joint [MTP] views) for measuring medial joint space width (JSW) of the knee in longitudinal osteoarthritis (OA) trials and to identify the percentage of patients with detectable progression.
Retrospective summary of the progression and variability of the change in JSW in knee OA.
Data from the placebo arms of three separate, structure modifying, knee OA trials were compared including gender, age, baseline JSW, change from baseline in JSW, duration of observation, and number and percent of patients with joint space narrowing of various degrees. Computer evaluation of the joint space at its narrowest point in the medial compartment was used in the studies. It is important to note that the narrowest joint space at baseline may not be in the same anatomic location at subsequent evaluations. No statistical tests were performed.
The average observation times were 0.98, 0.68 and 0.82 years for the Fluoro, FF, and MTP studies, respectively. The amount of progression was different among the three studies. The Fluoro study showed the greatest magnitude of OA structural progression and the lowest variability. The Fluoro study was expected to show the greatest magnitude of structural progression since it was conducted for the longest duration. For all patients, the standard deviation of the change in JSW was 0.42, 0.63, and 0.53 mm for the Fluoro, FF, and MTP studies, respectively. The percent of patients with detectable progression was similar across studies.
With these data, information was not sufficient to control for duration of observation and differences in inclusion criteria for the three study populations. Therefore, no definitive conclusions can be made regarding the degree of progression of OA over specific time intervals. However, the data indicate that all three studies contain a cohort of patients that exhibit detectable progression.

8 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To quantify tibial cancellous bone changes over 24 months in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) subdivided into those with slow or detectable joint space narrowing (JSN). Digitised macroradiographs (4x) were obtained at baseline and 24 months from 40 patients (F:26) and subdivided by computerised measurement of minimum medial compartment joint space width (JSW) into those with slow JSN (<0.2 mm/year, n=66) or detectable JSN (>or=0.2 mm/year, n=14) and who had a mean (range) JSW at baseline of 3.89 (1.66-5.48) mm and 3.73 (2.49-5.74) mm, respectively. Fractal Signature Analysis measured longitudinal change in bone structure at four regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) regions. Mean (range) JSN for slow and detectable groups was 0.01 (-0.31-0.18) mm/year and 0.44 (0.20-1.01)mm/year, respectively. All ROIs in both groups had significant (P<0.05) decrease in fractal dimension (FD) at most trabecular sizes (vertical: 0.36-1.14 mm; horizontal: 0.36-1.14 mm, excluding the lateral Sa region) over 24 months. There were no between-group differences except at a few trabecular sizes within the Sa regions where the detectable JSN group had significantly (P<0.05) greater decrease in FD compared to the slow JSN group (medial: horizontal sizes 0.54-0.72 mm, 1.02-1.08 mm; lateral: vertical sizes 0.90-1.02 mm). Bone loss occurred in all knees with medial compartment OA. Decrease in FD of vertical and horizontal trabeculae was consistent with decrease in trabecular number associated with loss. The pattern of bone loss was similar in knees with slow and detectable JSN.
    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 07/2005; 13(6):463-70. DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2005.01.007 · 4.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the differences in the radioanatomical appearance of the tibiofemoral compartment in knees radiographed in the fluoroscopic semiflexed, semiflexed MTP and fixed flexion methods compared to that obtained in the extended knee position. To assess the differences in the radiological procedures between the fluoroscopic and nonfluoroscopic semiflexed methods of radiography. Based on anatomical principals to describe the differences in (1) the content of the joint space in knees radiographed in the extended and semiflexed positions and (2) the sectional plane for joint space width (JSW) measurement in radiographs of knees positioned in the extended, fluoroscopic guided semiflexed, MTP and fixed flexion positions. From published procedures to determine the factors that affect study costs, X-ray technologists operating time and film processing in fluoroscopic and nonfluoroscopic methods of radiography. Medial compartment JSW from semiflexed methods only accurately measures cartilage thickness. All semiflexed methods reproducibly reposition the joint within any one patient. The angle at the tibiofemoral joint varies little between patients in the fluoroscopic semiflexed, less in the MTP and more so in the fixed flexion positions; the latter is due to the effect weight-associated differences in thigh girth. The sectional plane of JSW measurement is generally similar within the three views. Compared to the fluoroscopic method the radiological procedures of the nonfluoroscopic techniques were less demanding. The MTP and fixed flexion methods are much easier to use than the fluoroscopic method. They reproducibly reposition the knee within patient knees and between knees in the MTP but less so in the fixed flexion view.
    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 02/2006; 14 Suppl A:A19-31. DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2003.09.012 · 4.17 Impact Factor
Show more


8 Reads
Available from