Article

Shim EJ, Mehnert A, Koyama A, Cho SJ, Inui H, Paik NS, Koch UHealth-related quality of life in breast cancer: a cross-cultural survey of German, Japanese, and South Korean patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99: 341-350

Institute of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hemburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr,52-S35, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (Impact Factor: 4.2). 11/2006; 99(3):341-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9216-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in breast cancer patients across countries, and to cross-culturally examine the impact of psychosocial factors on HRQOL.
A total of 413 women with breast cancer from Germany (n = 195), Japan (n = 112), and Korea (n = 106) completed a survey assessing HRQOL and HRQOL-related factors. HRQOL was measured using the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8). Measures of psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Impact of Event Scale-Revised), coping (Dealing with Illness Inventory-German Revised), and social support (Illness-Specific Social Support Scale-German Revised) were included.
The effect of the factor country on physical QOL was seen to be significant, but small (P = 0.049, ES = 0.018). The scales of General Health (P = 0.023), Vitality (P = 0.004), and Role Emotional (P = 0.003) differed across countries, with the South Korean patients having lower scores compared to the German and Japanese patients. The nature of the impact of psychosocial factors on HRQOL did not differ greatly across countries except with regard to avoidance, however, the degree to which these factors influence HRQOL did differ greatly. Overall, depression, depressive coping, and problematic support showed a strong detrimental effect on the HRQOL of breast cancer patients.
Results from this study suggest that strategies which target an improvement of HRQOL in cancer patients should also consider the patients' cultural and healthcare system contexts. Interventions are needed to improve detrimental psychosocial factors.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Anja Mehnert, Oct 13, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
161 Views
 · 
14 Downloads
  • Source
    • "A few factors have been identified as predictors of overall quality of life among women with recurrent breast cancer, including age, time since recurrence, recurrence pattern (local-regional or distant recurrence), sites of metastasis, current physical symptoms, and treatment status [16-18]. Unmet needs were reported to be associated with QOL in breast cancer patients [13,15,19,20]. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated the predictive value of unmet needs on QOL among recurrent breast cancer patients. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the effects of unmet needs on quality of life (QOL) among recurrent breast cancer survivors. Completed questionnaires were collected from 52 women with recurrent breast cancer. Clinical and socio-demographic characteristics were reviewed, and the Supportive Care Needs Survey, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Instrument, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were administered. The frequency of unmet needs and the mean differences by patient characteristics and BDI scores were analyzed. The predictive value of unmet needs on QOL, controlling for socio-demographic variables and then for clinical variables, was analyzed in hierarchical regression models. The most common unmet needs belonged to the health system and information domain. The depressive group had greater unmet needs in the psychological domain (p<0.001), physical and daily living domain (p=0.001), and health and information domain (p=0.002). Patients with lower education attainment and those with lower performance status had greater unmet needs in the psychological needs (p=0.002) and in the physical and daily living needs domain (p=0.002), respectively. Unmet needs in the psychological domain (p=0.008), physical and daily living domain (p=0.022), and sexuality domain (p=0.040) strongly predicted QOL of women with recurrent breast cancer. Unmet needs were strong predictors for QOL among recurrent breast cancer patients. This suggests that QOL of women with recurrent breast cancer is possibly more affected by unmet needs than by patient's socio-demographic or clinical characteristics. Intervention strategies could be developed based on the identified needs of women with recurrent breast cancer in order to improve their QOL. Further longitudinal and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm the independent impact of unmet needs on QOL.
    Journal of Breast Cancer 12/2012; 15(4):454-61. DOI:10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.454 · 1.32 Impact Factor
    • "In supporting the results of the present study, the study of Ozon et al., titled as quality of life in breast cancer patients in Turkey showed that statistically there was no significant correlation between age, marital status, monthly income level with QoL; however, there was a direct correlation between education and QoL. In a study by Shim et al., there was also a significant correlation between education and QoL; while there was no correlation between age and marital status with QoL.[34] The reasons of these differences can be due to probable differences in some inclusion criteria and/or other above mentioned causes. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was performed to examine quality of life's dimensions and its relationship with some clinical and demographic characteristics on women with breast cancer under chemotherapy referred to the oncology hospital, Isfahan University of medical sciences, Iran. This Cross sectional study was conducted among 330 a descriptive-analytic one breast cancer patients with simple sampling methodology. Data collection instrument included a questionnaire contains 2 parts (clinical and demographic characteristics information and version 2.0 of the SF-36 questionnaire (the international version). The data were analyzed with 99% confidence by carried out using SPSS(18) with using descriptive and analytic statistics. The majority of subjects' quality of life was moderate (53.93%). there was a statistically significant relationship between quality of life among breast cancer patients with chemotherapy sessions (P < 0.05, df =4, χ(2) = 16.37). One way Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) suggested the absence of any significant relationship between quality of life with marital status (f = 0.21; P = 0.92) and employment status (f = 0.26; P = 0.77). Also, Spearman test showed the absence of any significant relationship between quality of life with age (P = 0.60), and the elapsed duration from diagnosis (P = 0.68), however Spearman test showed significant relationship between quality of life and education status (P = 0.002, r = -0.84). This study showed a direct correlation with regard to results of this study, there was a direct correlation between the number of chemotherapy sessions and patients quality of life. The attitude of the population toward chemotherapy is usually inhibiting and negative, so patients, students and nurses should be trained about chemotherapy efficacy to improve their attitude about chemotherapy, which in turn would lead to improvement of the patients' quality of life.
    International journal of preventive medicine 12/2012; 3(12):853-9. DOI:10.4103/2008-7802.104856
  • Source
    • "Although the IES has been used fairly frequently to assess distress among cancer survivors (see, e.g., Kelly et al, 1995; Chen et al, 2005; Shim et al, 2006), it has rarely been applied in the context of screening or investigations for suspected cancer. The average distress score and the percentage with moderate or severe distress at 6 weeks post procedure in our study (mean=8.0, "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The debate continues regarding the best management for women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology attending colposcopy. We compared psychosocial outcomes of alternative management policies in these women. In all, 989 women, aged 20-59 years, with low-grade abnormal cytology, were randomised to immediate large loop excision (LLETZ) or two to four targeted punch biopsies taken immediately with recall for LLETZ if these showed cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia 2/3. At 6 weeks after the last procedure, women completed the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and the impact of event scale (IES). At 12, 18, 24 and 30 months post recruitment, women completed the HADS and process outcome specific measure (POSM). Prevalence of significant depression (≥ 8), significant anxiety (≥ 11) and distress (≥ 9) and median POSM scores were compared between arms. Multivariate odds ratios (ORs) for immediate LLETZ vs biopsy and recall were computed. Over the entire follow-up, there was no significant difference between arms in cumulative prevalence or risk of significant depression (OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.52-1.17) or significant anxiety (OR=0.83, 95% CI 0.57-1.19). At 6 weeks post procedure, distress did not differ significantly between arms. At later time points, 8-11% had significant depression and 14-16% had significant anxiety but with no differences between arms. The POSM scores did not differ between the arms. There is no difference in long- or short-term psychosocial outcomes of immediate LLETZ and punch biopsies with selective recall.
    British Journal of Cancer 01/2011; 104(2):255-64. DOI:10.1038/sj.bjc.6606042 · 4.82 Impact Factor
Show more