Treatment adherence with antipsychotic medications in bipolar disorder.

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Bipolar Disorders (Impact Factor: 4.89). 07/2006; 8(3):232-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00314.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Atypical antipsychotic medications are a relatively new, increasingly prominent component of the treatment armamentarium for bipolar disorder. Information on adherence with antipsychotics among individuals with bipolar disorder in general, and atypical antipsychotics in particular, is currently quite limited. Using data from the VA National Psychosis Registry, we examined adherence with antipsychotic medications among patients with bipolar disorder (n = 73,964).
Antipsychotic medication adherence among veterans with bipolar disorder was evaluated using the medication possession ratio and categorizing patients into three groups: fully adherent, partially adherent and non-adherent. We compared characteristics of bipolar patients who received versus those who did not receive antipsychotic medication, and also identified predictors of poor adherence with antipsychotic medications.
Approximately 45% (n = 32,993) of all individuals with bipolar disorder were prescribed antipsychotic medication. Individuals who were prescribed antipsychotic medications were younger and more often had comorbid substance abuse or post-traumatic stress disorder compared to individuals with bipolar disorder who were not prescribed antipsychotic medication. Just over half (51.9%) of individuals appear to be fully adherent with antipsychotic medications, while 48.1% of individuals are either partially adherent or non-adherent with antipsychotic medications. Factors associated with treatment non-adherence were younger age, minority ethnicity, comorbid substance abuse and homelessness.
Treatment non-adherence is a major issue for close to half of individuals with bipolar disorder prescribed antipsychotic medication. Additional studies are needed to better understand treatment adherence within the full range of pharmacologic therapies among individuals with bipolar disorder.

Download full-text


Available from: Marcia Valenstein, Apr 07, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Poor treatment adherence among patients with bipolar disorder (BD) is a common clinical problem. However, whether adherence is mostly determined by patient characteristics or attitudes, type of treatment or treatment side-effects remains poorly known. The Jorvi Bipolar Study (JoBS) is a naturalistic prospective 18-month study representing psychiatric in- and outpatients with DSM-IV BD I and II in three Finnish cities. During the 18-month follow-up we investigated the continuity of, attitudes towards and adherence to various types of psychopharmacological and psychosocial treatments among 168 psychiatric in- and outpatients with BD I or II. One-quarter of the patients using mood stabilizers or atypical antipsychotics discontinued medication during at least one treatment phase of the follow-up autonomously, mostly during depression. When pharmacotherapy continued, adherence was compromised in one-third. Rates of non-adherence to mood stabilizers or antipsychotics did not differ, but the predictors did. One-quarter of the patients receiving psychosocial treatments were non-adherent to them. Serum concentrations were not estimated. More than one-half of BD patients either discontinue pharmacotherapy or use it irregularly. Autonomous discontinuation takes place mostly in depression. Although rates of non-adherence do not necessarily differ between mood-stabilizing medications, the predictors for nonadherence do. Moreover, adherence to one medication does not guarantee adherence to another, nor does adherence at one time-point ensure later adherence. Attitudes towards treatments affect adherence to medications as well as to psychosocial treatments and should be repeatedly monitored. Non-adherence to psychosocial treatment should be given more attention.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 10/2013; 155. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.032 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We aimed to examine the adequacy of antidepressant treatment and compliance with treatment in bipolar patients with and without alcohol use disorders (AUD). We hypothesize that the adequacy of antidepressant treatment and the compliance with treatment for those with AUD are lower than for those without AUD. Subjects were 97 patients with current bipolar major depressive episode, 39 (40.2%) with lifetime history of AUD and 58 (59.8%) without AUD. Adequacy of antidepressant medication treatment in the 3 previous months was assessed using the Antidepressant Treatment History Form. Compliance rates were estimated. Rates of inadequate treatment were high in all patients. Bipolar patients with AUD (74.3%) showed higher rates of inadequate antidepressant treatment than those without AUD (67.3%). The proportion of intensive treatment was higher in bipolars without AUD (15.5%) than in those with AUD (2.6%). Median compliance was similar in bipolars with and without AUD. We lack serum medication levels to assess the compliance. We do not have data to address the possibility that the presence of AUD adversely affected prescribing practices. Bipolars with AUD had lower rates of adequate treatment than those without AUD, but the two groups were not different in terms of self-reported treatment adherence. The finding that bipolar patients with or without comorbid AUD did not receive adequate treatment is of considerable clinical relevance. It raises the question as to whether inadequate treatment of depression contributes to the high rates of morbidity, and attempted and completed suicides in bipolar patient populations.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 11/2008; 115(1-2):262-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2008.09.012 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since sustained treatment-adherence is often problematic and may limit clinical outcomes among bipolar disorder (BPD) patients, we sought risk factors to guide clinical prediction of nonadherence. Data were from a 2005 US national sample providing questionnaire responses by 131 randomly selected prescribing psychiatrists and their adult BPD patients. We contrasted demographic and clinical factors in treatment-adherent versus nonadherent patients (strictly defined as missing > or =1 dose within 10 days) in univariate analyses followed by multivariate logistic-regression modeling. Of 429 DSM-IV BPD patients (79% type-I; 62% women; 17% minorities), 34% reported missing > or = 1 dose of psychotropic medication within 10 days, 20% missed entire daily doses at least once, and only 2.5% missed all doses for 10 days. However, their prescribing psychiatrists considered only 6% as treatment-nonadherent. Factors significantly associated with nonadherence in multivariate modeling ranked: alcohol-dependence > youth > greater affective morbidity > various side effects > or = comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder > or = recovering from mania-hypomania. Unrelated were sex, diagnostic subtype, and other comorbidities. Since most patients received > or = 2 psychotropics, potential relationships between treatment-complexity and adherence were obscured. Prevalent treatment-nonadherence among American BPD patients, and striking underestimation of the problem by prescribing clinicians may encourage increasingly complex treatment-regimens of untested value, but added expense, risk of adverse effects, and uncertain impact on treatment-adherence itself.
    Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental 03/2008; 23(2):95-105. DOI:10.1002/hup.908 · 1.85 Impact Factor