Trends in alcohol-related mortality in Sweden 1969-2002: An age-period-cohort analysis
Centre for Epidemiology, National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden. Addiction
(Impact Factor: 4.74).
07/2006; 101(6):835-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01421.x
To study the effects of age, period and cohorts on alcohol-related mortality trends in Sweden.
The study comprises an age-period-cohort analysis.
The analysis was based on all deaths in the Swedish population between 1969 and 2002.
Data on alcohol-related deaths in Sweden from 1969 to 2002 excluding accidental injury and homicide were used. The analysis covered 43 021 deaths.
Time period and birth cohort both influenced alcohol-related mortality. Male cohorts born in the 1930-40s exhibited the highest alcohol-related mortality, while for females those born in the 1940-50s had the highest alcohol-related mortality. For both men and women, those born in the 1960-70s had the lowest age-adjusted alcohol-related mortality. High-risk cohorts were young or in early adulthood during the periods that alcohol became more available in Sweden. The low-risk cohorts of the 1960-70s were brought up during a period when society was concerned with increasing alcohol problems and more emphasis was placed on issuing alcohol awareness information in schools.
Cohort effects were found suggesting that the link between alcohol consumption and non-accident alcohol-related mortality at the population level is dependent on other factors that may change over time. One such factor may be that restrictive alcohol policies have a greater effect on drinking in those who are younger at the time they are put into effect.
Figures in this publication
Available from: Sian Griffiths
- "Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of considering the three time-related effects of age, period and cohort when examining the trends in alcohol consumption –; however, the influence of these effects on the trends of alcohol-related health outcomes have been understudied , . Moreover, less is known about the role of these effects in influencing alcohol-related health outcomes in a population that is traditionally not known to have high alcohol consumption levels. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To delineate the temporal dynamics between alcohol tax policy changes and related health outcomes, this study examined the age, period and cohort effects on alcohol-related mortality in relation to changes in government alcohol policies. We used the age-period-cohort modeling to analyze retrospective mortality data over 30 years from 1981 to 2010 in a rapidly developed Chinese population, Hong Kong. Alcohol-related mortality from 1) chronic causes, 2) acute causes, 3) all (chronic+acute) causes and 4) causes 100% attributable to alcohol, as defined according to the Alcohol-Related Disease Impact (ARDI) criteria developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, were examined. The findings illustrated the possible effects of alcohol policy changes on adult alcohol-related mortality. The age-standardized mortality trends were generally in decline, with fluctuations that coincided with the timing of the alcohol policy changes. The age-period-cohort analyses demonstrated possible temporal dynamics between alcohol policy changes and alcohol-related mortality through the period effects, and also generational impact of alcohol policy changes through the cohort effects. Based on the illustrated association between the dramatic increase of alcohol imports in the mid-1980s and the increased alcohol-related mortality risk of the generations coming of age of majority at that time, attention should be paid to generations coming of drinking age during the 2007-2008 duty reduction.
PLoS ONE 08/2014; 9(8):e99906. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0099906 · 3.23 Impact Factor
Available from: Katherine M Keyes
- "Finally, most studies included in this review are based on self-report of respondents via surveys. Those studies that did not collect data from self-report (Corrao, Ferrari et al. 1997; Kendler, Prescott et al. 1997; Rosen and Haglund 2006; Aristei, Perali et al. 2008; Zhang, Guo et al. 2008) did not consistently document cohort effects, raising questions about the validity of the self-report data. Survey data is an imperfect tool for gauging the total amount of alcohol consumed (Del Boca and Darkes 2003), and the validity of self-reported alcohol consumption is likely subject to some of the same social norms identified above as a potential mechanism driving cohort effects in alcohol consumption. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Alcohol consumption has demonstrated substantial temporal trends, with some evidence suggesting strong birth cohort effects. The identification of at-risk birth cohorts can inform the interpretation of alcohol trends across age, time, and demographic characteristics such as gender. The present literature review has 2 objectives. First, we conduct a cross-national review of the literature on birth cohort differences in alcohol consumption, disorder, and mortality. Second, we determine the consistency of evidence for birth cohort effects on gender differences.
A search was conducted and key data on population characteristics, presence and direction of cohort effects, and interactions with gender compiled. Thirty-one articles were included.
Evidence suggests that younger birth cohorts in North America, especially those born after World War II, are more likely than older cohorts to engage in heavy episodic drinking and develop alcohol disorders, but this cohort effect is not found in Australia and western Europe. Cross-nationally, substantial evidence indicates that women in younger cohorts are at especially high risk for heavy episodic drinking and alcohol disorders.
Younger birth cohorts in North America and Europe are engaging in more episodic and problem drinking. The gender gap in alcohol problems is narrowing in many countries, suggesting shifting social norms surrounding gender and alcohol consumption. These trends suggest that public health efforts to specifically target heavy drinking in women are necessary.
Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 09/2011; 35(12):2101-12. DOI:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01562.x · 3.21 Impact Factor
Available from: alcalc.oxfordjournals.org
- "Internationally, several indicators of alcohol consumption have been explored from the perspectives of APC. These include alcohol-related mortality (Rosén and Haglund, 2006), different beverage types (Kerr et al., 2004), volume of consumption (Kerr et al., 2009), drinking frequency (Levenson et al., 1998), heavy drinking frequency (BjØrk et al., 2008) and number of drinking days (Kerr et al., 2009). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To analyse the effects of age, period and cohort (APC) on light and binge drinking in the general population of Finland over the past 40 years.
All analyses were based on six Drinking Habits Surveys between 1968 and 2008 of representative samples of the Finnish population aged between 15 and 69 (n = 16,400). The number of drinking occasions per year involving 1-2 drinks (light) and 4+ or 6+ drinks (binges) was used as a dependent variable in APC modelling. Descriptive cohort profiles and negative binomial models were used to assess the effects of APC.
Descriptive cohort profiles differed for light and binge drinking. No substantial differences were found across cohort profiles for light drinking, while APC modelling predicted declining cohort and increasing period effects. Differences between cohorts were found for binge drinking, with predictions of slightly declining or increasing period and increasing cohort effects.
Light drinking has increased over time for each cohort, with no substantial differences between cohort profiles. Binge drinking has increased with more recent cohorts and there are distinct differences between cohort profiles, especially among women.
Alcohol and Alcoholism 04/2011; 46(3):349-56. DOI:10.1093/alcalc/agr025 · 2.89 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.