Article

Acute necrotizing esophagitis: role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, 1-30 Fujigaoka, Yokohama, 227-8501, Japan.
Journal of Gastroenterology (impact factor: 4.16). 04/2006; 41(3):193-7. DOI:10.1007/s00535-005-1741-6 pp.193-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Acute necrotizing esophagitis (ANE) is a rarely described entity that is thought to be a cause of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding, The present study examined the incidence of ANE among patients with UGI bleeding, as well as the clinical features of ANE, and the coexisting illnesses and medication histories of ANE patients.
A retrospective analysis of clinical and endoscopic findings and the clinical course in 16 patients with ANE was carried out over a 3-year period.
We observed 16 patients (6%) of ANE in 239 patients with UGI bleeding during the 3-year period. The average age of the patients was 62.5 years. The lesions predominantly affected the lower third of the esophagus, and hiatal hernia was the most common (63%) coexisting endoscopic finding. All patients had coexisting disease. Fifty percent of patients with ANE (eight patients) had taken nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). ANE also occurred in four patients with diabetic ketoacidosis. Supportive therapy, including parenteral nutrition and administration of a proton pump inhibitor, was effective.
ANE is more common than has been previously reported, and it should be included in the differential diagnosis of UGI bleeding. ANE could be characterized as an "acute esophageal mucosal lesion," particularly in aged patients with hiatal hernia and among those who consume NSAIDs.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
22 Views
  • Source
    Article: Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhosis: findings, implications, and outcomes.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: At least two thirds of cirrhotic patients develop esophageal varices during their lifetime. Severe upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding as a complication of portal hypertension develops in about 30%-40% of cirrhotics. Despite significant improvements in the early diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage, the mortality rate of first variceal hemorrhage remains high (20%-35%). Primary prophylaxis, the focus of this article, is treatment of patients who never had previous variceal bleeding to prevent the first variceal hemorrhage. The potential of preventing first variceal hemorrhage offers the promise of reducing mortality, morbidity, and associated health care costs. This article (1) reviews endoscopic grading of size and stigmata for esophageal and gastric varices, (2) describes data on prevalence and incidence of esophageal and gastric varices from prospective studies, (3) discusses independent risk factors from multivariate analyses of prospective studies for development of first esophageal or gastric variceal hemorrhage and possible stratification of patients based on these risk factors, (4) comments on the potential cost effectiveness of screening all newly diagnosed cirrhotic patients and treating high-risk patients with medical or endoscopic therapies, and (5) recommends further studies of endoscopic screening, stratification, and outcomes in prospective studies of endoscopic therapy. The author's recommendations are to perform endoscopic screening for the following subgroups of cirrhotics: all newly diagnosed cirrhotic patients and all other cirrhotics who are medically stable, willing to be treated prophylactically, and would benefit from medical or endoscopic therapies. Exclude patients who are unlikely to benefit from prophylactic therapies designed to prevent the first variceal hemorrhage, those with short life expectancy, and those with previous UGI hemorrhage (they should have already undergone endoscopy). For low or very low risk cirrhotic patients-those found to have no varices or small varices without stigmata-repeat endoscopy is recommended because screening for progression may be warranted in 2 or more years.
    Gastroenterology 06/2002; 122(6):1620-30. · 11.68 Impact Factor
  • Article: Acute necrotizing esophagitis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Esophagitis of varying degrees and significance is caused by reflux, infections, radiation, and ingestion of chemical agents. A case of necrotizing esophagitis, seen as a black esophagus on endoscopy in a postoperative patient and resulting in long tubular stricture which ultimately required esophagectomy, is reported. Although the course of necrotizing esophagitis may parallel that associated with ischemia, severe caustic injury, or overwhelming infection, its etiology is uncertain. Diminished mucosal defenses, microbial implantation by a nasogastric tube placed perioperatively or sepsis, and transient ischemia with oxyradical formation and resultant reperfusion injury are hypothesized as important causative factors in the pathogenesis of acute necrotizing esophagitis.
    Gastroenterology 03/1990; 98(2):493-6. · 11.68 Impact Factor
  • Article: Idiopathic acute esophageal necrosis: not necessarily a terminal event.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Idiopathic acute esophageal necrosis (AEN) has been considered a rare event, usually having an ischemic origin. Primarily cases from autopsy studies have been reported. This report deals with 10 such cases which were diagnosed among some 80,000 esophago-gastroscopies performed during a 16-year period. Nine patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital. The esophageal lesions presented as a demarcated, black discoloration which usually evolved to a picture suggestive of unspecific esophagitis. Histology invariably revealed diffuse and conspicuous necrosis involving the mucosa, submucosa and, frequently, muscular layers. In 2 cases, esophageal stenosis developed and, in one case, a full-thickness necrosis made surgery with colon interposition mandatory. Hyperglycemia, hypoxia, carcinoma and ischemic phenomena were found as associated conditions. Gastroduodenal, acute ulcerative disease was present in four patients. From this experience, it is concluded that AEN is not necessarily a terminal phenomenon, notwithstanding that it is usually associated with pre-existent serious illness. Nevertheless, its etiology remains unknown.
    Endoscopy 11/1993; 25(8):534-8. · 5.21 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
3 Downloads
Available from
1 Apr 2013

Keywords

16 patients
 
3-year period
 
acute esophageal mucosal lesion
 
Acute necrotizing esophagitis
 
ANE patients
 
average age
 
clinical course
 
clinical features
 
coexisting illnesses
 
described entity
 
differential diagnosis
 
lesions
 
lower third
 
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
 
parenteral nutrition
 
patients
 
proton pump inhibitor
 
retrospective analysis
 
UGI
 
upper gastrointestinal