Evaluation of a Dutch Public-private Partnership to Promote Healthier Diet

Department of Health Education and Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
American journal of health promotion: AJHP (Impact Factor: 2.37). 05/2006; 20(5):309-12. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.5.309
Source: PubMed


Public-private partnerships may help to promote healthy diets. We assessed customers' exposure to and the acceptability of a Dutch public-private healthy diet campaign in butcher's shops and investigated the effects on the purchase of lean meat and the use of liquid cooking margarine and potential behavioral determinants.
The pretest-posttest control group design included 486 customers (242 experimental and 244 control) of butcher shops representing 64% of the original sample. Campaign exposure, acceptability, and behavioral effects were measured by a questionnaire.
Seventy-one percent of the customers noticed the campaign. Scores on the acceptability were positive to very positive. Regression analysis revealed that customers in the experimental condition evaluated the campaign better (B = .415; p < .05) and felt more encouraged to buy lean meat (B = .252; p < .05) than customers in the control condition. No effects on behavior were found.
Study design limitations included possible campaign exposure of control group participants. The study shows the feasibility and acceptability of a joint health-promoting activity through a public-private partnership, but there were no effects on behavior.

Download full-text


Available from: Hilde M van Keulen, Jul 14, 2014
  • Source

    Mathematical Social Sciences 01/2007; · 0.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe a public-private collaborative and present results from the administration of a baseline health risk assessment (HRA). A custom-designed HRA was made available to 31,535 New York workers, and 5539 (17.6%) completed the survey. Data from the HRA were used to present a business case to employers urging them to support health promotion efforts at their worksites. Of these, 78.5% of workers in the sample reported poor eating habits, 39.9% were sedentary, and 62.2% were overweight, obese, or extremely obese; 30.4% had high or borderline-high total cholesterol levels, 24.9% reported high or borderline high blood pressure, and 16.8% reported high or borderline high blood glucose levels; tobacco use rates were relatively low (14.0%). Results represent a baseline against which future data for the study cohort will be compared to evaluate the health and financial impacts of engaging employees in workplace health promotion programs.
    Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 03/2008; 50(2):190-201. DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e31815cbad0 · 1.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is an important public health risk, with children especially vulnerable to its adverse effects. This study evaluates an evidence-based social marketing and community engagement campaign designed to address children's exposure to ETS in the home. A pre- and post-intervention quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design was utilized. The intervention targeted households in which having a smoke-free home within the next six months was not even contemplated. Respondents from 1135 households in which both a smoker and a child lived participated in a pre-intervention telephone survey, with 1044 participating one year later, following the intervention. Outcome measures were awareness of the campaign in the intervention and control sites, and movement along Prochaska's stages of change model toward smoke-free home status.
    International Journal of Health Promotion and Education 01/2009; 47(2):57-62. DOI:10.1080/14635240.2009.10708160
Show more