The Binding of Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 and Hepatocyte Paraffin 1 to Mitochondrial Proteins in Hepatocytes

Department of Pathology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, VT, USA.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology (Impact Factor: 2.51). 06/2006; 125(5):722-6. DOI: 10.1309/EBCB-6H54-K1N2-P9QL
Source: PubMed


We studied the antibodies hepatocyte paraffin 1 (Hep Par 1) and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1; clone 8G7G3/1) in normal human liver tissue with immunoelectron microscopy using renal tubules as control samples. TTF-1 (8G7G3/1) and Hep Par 1 bound exclusively to the mitochondria of hepatocytes but not to those of the renal tubular epithelium. Both antibodies labeled mitochondria in a similar pattern and density. These findings confirm that the binding site of Hep Par 1 in hepatocytes is mitochondrial. The specific binding of TTF-1 (8G7G3/1) in hepatocyte mitochondria suggests its potential usefulness for identifying hepatocellular carcinoma. Western blot analysis with cellular proteins extracted from normal human liver and thyroid tissue demonstrated that Hep Par 1 and TTF-1 (8G7G3/1) bound to a protein band of approximately 150 kd in liver cells, with TTF-1 (8G7G3/1) showing less affinity. It is likely that different epitopes to Hep Par 1 and TTF-1 (8G7G3/1) share the same protein molecule in hepatocyte mitochondria.

Download full-text


Available from: Douglas Taatjes, Mar 25, 2015
8 Reads
  • Annales de Pathologie 04/2007; 27(2):120-127. DOI:10.1016/S0242-6498(07)91296-1 · 0.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) continues to suffer from variable consistency, poor reproducibility, quality assurance disparities, and the lack of standardization resulting in poor concordance, validation, and verification. This document lists the recommendations made by the Ad-Hoc Committee on Immunohistochemistry Standardization to address these deficiencies. Contributing factors were established to be underfixation and irregular fixation, use of nonformalin fixatives and ancillary fixation procedures divested from a deep and full understanding of the IHC assay parameters, minimal or absent IHC assay optimization and validation procedures, and lack of a standard system of interpretation and reporting. Definitions and detailed guidelines pertaining to these areas are provided.
    Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology: AIMM / official publication of the Society for Applied Immunohistochemistry 07/2007; 15(2):124-33. DOI:10.1097/PAI.0b013e31804c7283 · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Histological subtyping of periampullary carcinomas is considered as a criterion for prognosis and therapeutic implications of these tumours. We assessed the immunoexpression rates of HepPar-1, CDX2 and MUC2 antibodies in different subtypes of periampullary adenocarcinomas (PAC), intestinal and pancreatobiliary, in order to assess their impact on differential diagnosis of this group of cancers. The expression of antibodies was also measured in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (DAPH). Sixty-five patients with PAC and DAPH who underwent pancreatic Whipple resection constituted the study cohort. Of these, 46 (71%) had PAC, and 19 (29%) had DAPH. Among PACs, 20 (44%) were intestinal and 26 (56%) were pancreatobiliary type. HepPar-1 immunoreactivity was detected in 18 (39%) of all PACs. The rate of HepPar-1 expression was significantly higher in intestinal type PAC (75%) than it was in pancreatobiliary type (12%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of HepPar-1 immunoexpression for diagnosing intestinal type PAC were 75% , 89%, and 83%, respectively. Similarly, the rates of both CDX2 and MUC2 expressions were significantly higher in intestinal type PAC (80%) than they were in pancreatobiliary type (8%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both CDX2 and MUC2 immunoexpressions for intestinal type PAC were 80%, 92%, and 87%, respectively. HepPar-1 antibody was found to be a highly sensitive and specific marker for distinguishing intestinal type from pancreatobiliary type among PACs. In addition to CDX2 and MUC2 antibodies, HepPar-1 immunoexpression seems to have a potential role in differential diagnosis of PACs.
    Pathology 02/2008; 40(1):35-41. DOI:10.1080/00313020701716391 · 2.19 Impact Factor
Show more