Article

Contact lens fitting in keratoconus.

VISSUM/ Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Comprehensive ophthalmology update 7(2):47-52.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The treatment of keratoconus can be implemented by the use of spectacle lenses, contact lenses of various kinds, and surgery. In this article, we deal with the procedures of contact lens fitting in patients diagnosed with keratoconus. The different types of specific contact lenses and the methodology of fitting these contact lenses for keratoconus are described. To select a contact lens for the individual patient depends upon the severity of keratoconus and the amount of corneal ectasia. Pending these criteria, a contact lens is chosen, which will give the best visual acuity and tolerance. At present, many designs of special contact lenses exist in oxygen-permeable materials; in addition, other systems, such as piggy-back, SoftPerm, semi-scleral, and scleral contact lens types are used. Contact lens fitting on a conical cornea will smooth out the highly irregular optical surface of the cornea and improve visual acuity considerably. Contact lenses are one of the better solutions to correct refractive errors induced by pathology, and they should be prescribed as soon as the keratoconus is detected to avoid development of amblyopia. The quality and quantity of vision is far better than with spectacle lens correction.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
97 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Purpose: To compare outcomes of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus (KC). Materials and methods: Patients were divided into two groups as the accelerated CXL group and the conventional CXL group. The uncorrected distant visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), refraction and keratometric values were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. The data of the two groups were compared statistically. Results: The mean UDVA and CDVA were better at the six month postoperative when compared with preoperative values in two groups. While change in UDVA and CDVA was statistically significant in the accelerated CXL group (p = 0.035 and p = 0.047, respectively), it did not reach statistical significance in the conventional CXL group (p = 0.184 and p = 0.113, respectively). The decrease in the mean corneal power (Km) and maximum keratometric value (Kmax) were statistically significant in both groups (p = 0.012 and 0.046, respectively in the accelerated CXL group, p = 0.012 and 0.041, respectively, in the conventional CXL group). There was no statistically significant difference in visual and refractive results between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Refractive and visual results of the accelerated CXL method and the conventional CXL method for the treatment of KC in short time period were similar. The accelerated CXL method faster and provide high throughput of the patients.
    Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 10/2013; · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the visual and refractive outcomes, safety, efficacy and stability of cataract surgery in eyes with stable keratoconus. 17 eyes (10 patients) diagnosed as stable keratoconus, aged from 34 to 73 years (56.63±12.47), underwent micro-incision cataract surgery (MICS) followed by implantation of toric intraocular lens (IOL). Seven of them were operated bilaterally and three unilaterally. A complete ophthalmological examination was performed preoperatively and postoperatively. The main outcome measures were: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), keratometry and manifest refraction. Sphere changed from -1.77±6.57D (-11.00 to 7.00) preoperatively to 0.08±0.79D (-1.25 to 1.75) postoperatively (p=0.211), and cylinder changed from -2.95±1.71D (-7.00 to -0.75) to -1.40±1.13D (-3.25 to 0.00) (p=0.016). UDVA (logMAR) changed from 1.33±0.95 (0.40 to 2.77) to 0.32±0.38 (0.00 to 1.30) (p=0.008) and CDVA (logMAR) changed from 0.32±0.45 (0.01 to 1.77) to 0.20±0.36 (-0.03 to 1.30) (p=0.013). Efficacy and safety indexes were 1.38±0.58 and 1.17±0.66, respectively. Refraction and corneal topography were stable during the follow-up (9.10±5.54 months, 3-15) CONCLUSIONS: MICS surgery using corneal topography data and standard formulas for the calculation of the IOL power is a safe and effective procedure regarding keratometric stability, visual and refractive results.
    The British journal of ophthalmology 01/2014; · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the vision related quality of life in patients with keratoconus by using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25). Methods. Thirty patients presented with keratoconus (keratoconus group) and 30 healthy patients (control group) were included in this study. Twenty patients were using rigid gas permeable and 10 patients were not using contact lenses in keratoconus group. High and low contrast visual acuity and mean K values of the patients were recorded. Each subject completed the 25-item NEI-VFQ-25. Results. All subscales of NEI-VFQ-25 were lower in the keratoconus patients. The difference was more evident in the subscales of general vision, ocular pain, near vision, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, and peripheral vision . Overall composite score was 75.2 +/- 17.2 in the keratoconus group and 93.2 +/- 5.6 in the control group . Contact lens wearers had higher best corrected visual acuity in comparison with noncontact lens wearers . Patients with low visual acuity (logMAR > 0.4) in the better eye had lower distance vision, social functioning, mental health, and role difficulties. Meanwhile, patients with low visual acuity (logMAR > 0.4) in the worse eye had lower general health scores . Conclusions. Vision related quality of life was worse in keratoconus patients. Success in the contact lens usage and maintaining higher visual acuity may improve vision related quality of life.
    Journal of Ophthalmology 04/2014; 2014. · 1.37 Impact Factor