Lawnmower injuries in the United States: 1996 to 2004.

Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Annals of emergency medicine (Impact Factor: 4.33). 07/2006; 47(6):567-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.02.020
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We update the epidemiology of lawnmower injuries, together with leading mechanisms of lawnmower injury in the United States, for the entire age range by using nationally representative data.
Data were obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Survey 1996-2003 and the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System 1996-2004.
Individuals in the 60- to 69-year age group had the highest push mower injury incidence in 2004, whereas those in the 70 years and older age group had the highest riding mower injury incidence. Children younger than 15 years also had a substantial injury incidence. Individuals in the 15- to 19-year age group had the highest rate of hospitalizations caused by lawnmower injuries from 1996 through 2003, with 0.72 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 1.36). Debris from under the mower hitting a body part or entering the eye was the most common mechanism for lawnmower injury. The second most common mechanism of injury was nonspecific pain onset after the ordinary operation of the mower. Fracture of 1 or more phalanges of the foot was the most common diagnosis among lawnmower injury hospitalizations, with 34.4%, followed by traumatic amputation of the toe, with 32.4%. There is an increasing trend of lawnmower injuries in the United States during the last 9 years.
Lawnmower injuries increase with age, with peaks in persons older than 59 years. Given the high incidence of projectile-related injuries, improved protective apparel and eyewear could lower the rate of injury for all age groups. The increasing trend of lawnmower injuries in the United States suggests that more must be done to prevent lawnmower injuries.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gardeners can be seriously injured when using power tools designed to cut and trim. This poses a public health problem that requires understanding of the risk of using these tools in order to develop sound preventive measures. Epidemiological data provide global descriptions of mechanisms for injury, whereas observational studies provide detailed descriptions of risk in user-product interaction. Both types of information are needed for successful risk communication programs and design improvement of consumer products. This paper describes observational research that investigates how product users perceive possible risks that arise from the usage of their electrically gardening tools. The study aims at achieving a contextualised understanding of risk perception that takes into account the concerns that influence users’ risk perception and subsequent activities. The paper describes the emerging insights on the users’ point of view on risk in using powered gardening tools. It discusses how risk perception research may support risk communication and the design of safe(r) products.
    Safety Science. 01/2008;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Open foot fractures are rare, and few surgeons see the whole spectrum of these injuries. There has been no previous study of the epidemiology and severity of open foot fractures. A 23-year study of the epidemiology of open fractures was undertaken in a hospital with a catchment area of about 530 000 adults. The results were used to calculate the incidences of open foot fractures and to study their epidemiology and severity. In 23 years, 348 open foot fractures were treated. Analysis showed 3 levels of severity with the least severe fractures being isolated open forefoot fractures, which occurred in 69% of the patients. Patients with multiple forefoot fractures had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS), prevalence of Gustilo type III fractures, and amputation rate. The most severely injured patients presented with open hindfoot and midfoot fractures. They had an average ISS of 12, and 65.9% had Gustilo type III fractures. In patients with open hindfoot fractures, the amputation rate was 17.1%. This rose to 30% in patients with open midfoot fractures. Open foot fractures tended to occur in younger patients, and only 13% were in patients aged at least 65 years. Open foot fractures are uncommon. There were 3 levels of injury. Level 1 injuries were isolated fractures of the forefoot. Level 2 injuries were multiple forefoot fractures, and level 3 injuries were open fractures of the midfoot and hindfoot. These were severe injuries with a high amputation rate. They should be treated in level 1 trauma centers. Level III, retrospective comparative series.
    Foot & Ankle International 03/2013; 34(3):323-8. · 1.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Yard maintenance equipment is potentially dangerous, and some of the more frequency used equipment (e.g., lawn mowers) has been extensively studied. However, the extent of lawn trimmers as a source of injury has not previously been explored. Data from the Consumer Product Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System were used to estimate the number of patients treated in U.S. emergency departments for lawn trimmer-related injuries. Injury rates were calculated according to age, sex, and race, and characteristics of the injury event were determined. An estimated 81,907 injuries involving a lawn trimmer occurred from 2000-2009. The incidence generally increased over time. Men, people aged 40-49, and Caucasians were the groups most likely to be injured. The most commonly injured body part was the head, specifically the eye, accounting for 42.5% of the injuries. Contusions and abrasions were the most common type of injury to the head, but lacerations were the most common injury to the extremities, and strains/sprains were the most common injury to the trunk. Although previous research on lawn trimmers has focused exclusively on injuries to the eyes, the results of the current study show that such injuries are one component of the problem. Because most of the injuries were due to foreign objects, it is important that the use of adequate safety gear be emphasized when operating lawn trimmers. Results suggest that lawn trimmer design changes and better safety education for trimmer use can reduce the rate of injury and reverse the current trend.
    Journal of safety research 04/2012; 43(2):137-9. · 1.34 Impact Factor