Article

Heel bone densitometry: device specific thresholds for the assessment of osteoporosis.

Regional Medical Physics Department, University Hospital of North Durham, North Road, Durham DH1 5TW, UK.
British Journal of Radiology (Impact Factor: 1.53). 07/2006; 79(942):464-7. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/47352663
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A diagnosis of osteoporosis is facilitated by bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the lumbar spine and hip using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), interpreted in accordance with criteria published by the World Health Organization (WHO). The use of peripheral DXA is growing in primary care and guidance on its use has recently been published by the National Osteoporosis Society (NOS), recommending a triage approach using thresholds specific to each type of peripheral device. However, no data currently exist for the Norland Apollo heel densitometer (Cooper Surgical, Trumbull, USA). 215 women between 50 years and 75 years of age (mean age 64.6 years) referred for hip and spine BMD measurements also had a heel BMD measurement. Device specific upper and lower thresholds were calculated for the Norland Apollo heel densitometer to give a 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity for osteoporosis at the hip or spine. Patients with a heel T-score of above -1.2 are very likely to have normal bone density on axial densitometry, whilst patients with heel T-score of below -2.2 are very likely to have osteoporosis at the hip or spine. Patients whose measurements lie between the thresholds should be referred for axial DXA.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
105 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, we evaluate the ability of digitized digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) bone mineral density (BMD) to identify women with reduced BMD at femoral neck, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The study population contained women with recent low-energy distal radius fracture and women recruited from the general population, all aged 50 yr or older. The correlation between hand BMD and femoral neck BMD was r=0.65 (p<0.001). We used a triage approach where 2 cutoffs for DXR T-score were defined at which patients with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity could be identified to have or not have reduced BMD at femoral neck, defined as T-score ≤-2.5 standard deviation (SD). The upper and lower DXR T-score cutoffs were -1.2 and -2.7, respectively. Applying the triage approach in the whole cohort, 32% would require a central DXA assessment to determine the presence or absence of femoral neck T-score ≤-2.5 SD. Our data suggest that DXR can be used to reduce the numbers of patients in need of DXA femoral neck and may, thus, be of clinical value where access to DXA is limited.
    Journal of Clinical Densitometry 10/2010; 13(4):418-25. · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements have been found to predict fractures in population studies of white subjects, little is known about their utility in other races and in patients with greater risk of fracture. In a cross-sectional study of 874 women referred for bone mineral density (BMD) testing, we examined the utility of heel BMD in African-American (AA) compared with Caucasian (CA) women and in women using glucocorticoids. The ability of heel T-score to predict central osteoporosis was similar in AA and CA women (odds ratio [OR] per 1 unit decrease in T-score of 2.79 [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.16-3.60] and 3.15 [95% CI 2.53-3.92], respectively). The association between heel T-score and prevalent vertebral fractures was also similar in the 2 groups (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.15-1.85] in AA and 1.42 [95% CI 1.16-1.74] in CA). In women using glucocorticoids heel T-score was better than central T-score in predicting vertebral fractures (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.03-1.85] and 1.22 [95% CI 0.86-1.73], respectively). We conclude that in a multiracial referral population heel BMD predicts central osteoporosis and prevalent vertebral fractures equally well in AA as in CA women and may be better than central BMD in assessing fragility in glucocorticoid users.
    Journal of Clinical Densitometry 10/2013; · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We calculate specific triage thresholds for the PIXI-LUNAR heel densitometer to give a 90% specificity for osteoporosis and normal bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip or spine. 693 women aged 30-93 years (mean age 58.2 ± 9.6 years) referred for osteoporosis study, underwent hip and spine BMD measurements (HOLOGIC) by dual energy X-ray absortiometry (DXA), also had a periph-eral heel DXA densitometry (PIXI-LUNAR). The os calcis T-scores for all woman were subjected to a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis with the definition of osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -2.5) and BMD normal (T-score > -1) made at the the lumbar spine or femoral neck. Patients with a heel T-score of above +0.6 are very likely to have normal bone density on axial densito-metry, whilst patients with heel T-score of below -1.3 are very likely to have osteoporosis at the hip or spine. Only patients whose measurements lie between the thresholds should be referred for axial DXA.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
40 Downloads
Available from
Jun 4, 2014