Treatment options in pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (Impact Factor: 1.54). 05/2006; 20(4):297; author reply 297-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Fracture of the femur in a pediatric patient presents special problems, and a variety of treatment options. Child abuse and neglect should be considered and evaluated. Fractures in infants (0-18 months) may be treated successfully in a Pavlik Harness. Spica casting is safe and effective in children up to about 6 years or 100 pounds, although complications can occur and careful attention to technique is important. Surgical treatment is superior in most older or larger children or adolescents, and in cases of multiple trauma, soft tissue injury, obesity or head injury. External fixation is minimally invasive, but carries a risk of malunion and refracture. Rigid antegrade intramedully nailing is possible in adolescents of accept- able size, but has a risk of avascular necrosis. Flexible nailing is minimally invasive and well suited to fractures of the central 2/3 of the diaphysis. In comminuted fractures, it may require supplemental external support. Plate fixation is stable and addresses the entire length of the femur. Soft tissue concerns due to surgical exposure can be minimized by the use of submuscular placement technique.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zusammenfassung Bei der Behandlung von Frakturen der langen Röhrenknochen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen stellen operative und konservative Behandlungsmethoden keine sich ausschließenden Alternativen dar, sondern sind vielmehr sich ergänzende Bestandteile des gesamten Therapiekonzeptes. Viele operative Maßnahmen, z. B. die Fixation gelenknaher metaphysärer Frakturen, bedürfen der Ergänzung durch konservative Verfahren, wie z. B. ruhig stellende Gips- oder Kunststoffverbände. Unter konservativen Behandlungsmethoden verstehen wir solche, die ohne Narkose und selbstverständlich ohne Implantation von osteosynthetischen Fremdkörpern durchgeführt werden können. Es sind dies also die reine Ruhigstellung, die Gipskeilung und funktionelle Therapien. Die Indikationen für rein konservative Behandlungsstrategien unterscheiden sich grundlegend für Gelenk- und Schaftfrakturen. Während bei Gelenkfrakturen nur undislozierte Frakturen allein konservativ behandelt werden, können im Schaftbereich auch solche Brüche nichtoperativ und narkosefrei therapiert werden, deren Dislokationsgrad die Integration von Spontankorrekturen in das Behandlungskonzept erlaubt.
    Der Unfallchirurg 10/2007; 110(10):811-823. DOI:10.1007/s00113-007-1318-3 · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The proximal humerus tends to fracture into four distinct fragments: the humeral shaft, the greater and lesser tuberosities, and the articular surface.1 Neer based his classification system on displacement of these fragments by greater than 1 cm or angulation of more than 45°. In a retrospective review, Neer found that 85% of fractures were considered to be minimally displaced and nonoperative management led to satisfactory results. Displaced two-part greater tuberosity fractures, according to the above criteria, were treated with open reduction and internal fixation.1,2 Several authors, however, have advocated treatment that is more aggressive for fractures of the greater tuberosity. Five millimeters of displacement, particularly in the superior direction, has been suggested as an indication for operative management.3–5 The major deforming forces on the greater tuberosity are the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor, resulting in superior and/or posterior pull of the fragment. Malunion with superior displacement may lead to painful impingement and posterior displacement may result in loss of external rotation, which can be challenging to treat.6–8
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Complex, high-energy pediatric femur diaphyseal fractures cannot be treated reliably by conventional methods: casting is not suitable for polytrauma and large children, external fixation is associated with a high rate of malalignment and refractures, elastic nails are unsuitable for unstable fractures and metaphyseal areas, and lateral trochanteric entry rigid nails cannot address proximal and distal fragments and need relatively large medullary canals. A few centers have reported that submuscular bridge plating (SBP) is associated with minimal complications, but these findings require confirmation. We asked whether SBP (1) reproducibly leads to union in unstable fractures with a low complication rate, (2) leads to reasonable alignment and leg length equality (3), is unaffected by age, weight, or location of fracture, and (4) is associated with no or minimal refracture after hardware removal. We retrospectively reviewed 60 fractures in 58 patients with pediatric diaphyseal femoral fractures treated with SBP from 1999 to 2011. The average age was 9 years. Forty (67%) of the fractures were unstable. Minimum followup was 2.4 months (average, 15.5 months; range, 2.4-50.6 months). All fractures healed well and all patients returned to full activity. Two of the 58 patients (3%) had major complications leading to unplanned surgeries: one implant failure and one deep infection in an old open fracture. None of the patients developed clinically important malalignment or leg length discrepancy. Implant removal was performed in 49 patients without complications. SBP provided reliable fixation and healing for complex pediatric femur fractures and can have a broader application in the orthopaedic community. SBP is our preferred method for unstable fractures or fractures of the proximal and distal shaft.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 09/2013; 471(9). DOI:10.1007/s11999-013-2931-9 · 2.88 Impact Factor