The health of UK military personnel who deployed to the 2003 Iraq War a cohort study

King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, UK.
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 45.22). 06/2006; 367(9524):1731-41. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68662-5
Source: PubMed


Concerns have been raised about the mental and physical health of UK military personnel who deployed to the 2003 war in Iraq and subsequent tours of duty in the country.
We compared health outcomes in a random sample of UK armed forces personnel who were deployed to the 2003 Iraq war with those in personnel who were not deployed. Participants completed a questionnaire covering the nature of the deployment and health outcomes, which included symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, common mental disorders, general wellbeing, alcohol consumption, physical symptoms, and fatigue.
The participation rate was 62.3% (n=4722) in the deployed sample, and 56.3% (n=5550) in the non-deployed sample. Differences in health outcomes between groups were slight. There was a modest increase in the number of individuals with multiple physical symptoms (odds ratio 1.33; 95% CI 1.15-1.54). No other differences between groups were noted. The effect of deployment was different for reservists compared with regulars. In regulars, only presence of multiple physical symptoms was weakly associated with deployment (1.32; 1.14-1.53), whereas for reservists deployment was associated with common mental disorders (2.47, 1.35-4.52) and fatigue (1.78; 1.09-2.91). There was no evidence that later deployments, which were associated with escalating insurgency and UK casualties, were associated with poorer mental health outcomes.
For regular personnel in the UK armed forces, deployment to the Iraq war has not, so far, been associated with significantly worse health outcomes, apart from a modest effect on multiple physical symptoms. There is evidence of a clinically and statistically significant effect on health in reservists.

Download full-text


Available from: Tess E Browne,
  • Source
    • "Sample weights were generated to account for sampling strategies. Response weights were also generated to account for non-response (Hotopf et al., 2006). The sample and response weights were multiplied together to generate one combined weight. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: We assessed changes in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores over time. We investigated the impact of life events and changes in mental health status on AUDIT scores over time in UK military personnel. Methods: A random representative sample of regular UK military personnel who had been serving in 2003 were surveyed in 2004-2006 (phase 1) and again in 2007-2009 (phase 2). The impact of changes in symptoms of psychological distress, probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), marital status, serving status, rank, deployment to Iraq/Afghanistan and smoking was assessed between phases. Results: We found a statistically significant but small decrease in AUDIT scores between phases 1 and 2 (mean change=-1.01, 95% confidence interval=-1.14, -0.88). Participants reported a decrease in AUDIT scores if they experienced remission in psychological distress (adjusted mean -2.21, 95% CI -2.58, -1.84) and probable PTSD (adjusted mean -3.59, 95% CI -4.41, -2.78), if they stopped smoking (adjusted mean -1.41, 95% CI -1.83, -0.98) and were in a new relationship (adjusted mean -2.77, 95% CI -3.15, -2.38). On the other hand, reporting new onset or persistent symptoms of probable PTSD (adjusted mean 1.34, 95% CI 0.71, 1.98) or a relationship breakdown (adjusted mean 0.53, 95% CI 0.07, 0.99) at phase 2 were associated with an increase in AUDIT scores. Conclusions: The overall level of hazardous alcohol consumption remains high in the UK military. Changes in AUDIT scores were linked to mental health and life events but not with deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan.
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence 09/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.033 · 3.42 Impact Factor
    • "The estimated prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in veterans deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq since 2000 has ranged from 2 to 26% (Hoge et al. 2006; Hotopf et al. 2006; Smith et al. 2008b; Thomas et al. 2010; Davy et al. 2012; Dobson et al. 2012; Kok et al. 2012; Elbogen et al. 2014). While a number of studies have shown that events over the life cycle (including adversity in childhood and deployment stressors), are associated with increased rates of PTSD (Brailey et al. 2007; Phillips et al. 2010; Horesh et al. 2011; Jones et al. 2013), fewer studies have focused on the underlying events associated with PTSD diagnoses or the time taken for PTSD symptoms to appear and subside after traumatic events. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding the time-course of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and the underlying events, may help to identify those most at risk, and anticipate the number of individuals likely to be diagnosed after exposure to traumatic events. Data from two health surveys were combined to create a cohort of 1119 Australian military personnel who deployed to the Middle East between 2000 and 2009. Changes in PTSD Checklist Civilian Version (PCL-C) scores and the reporting of stressful events between the two self-reported surveys were assessed. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between the number of stressful events reported and PTSD symptoms, and assess whether those who reported new stressful events between the two surveys, were also more likely to report older events. We also assessed, using linear regression, whether higher scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale or the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test were associated with subsequent increases in the PCL-C in those who had experienced a stressful event, but who initially had few PTSD symptoms. Overall, the mean PCL-C scores in the two surveys were similar, and 78% of responders stayed in the same PCL-C category. Only a small percentage moved from having few symptoms of PTSD (PCL-C < 30) in Survey 1 to meeting the criteria for PTSD (PCL-C ≥ 50) at Survey 2 (1% of all responders, 16% of those with PCL-C ≥ 50 at Survey 2). Personnel who reported more stressful lifetime events were more likely to score higher on the PCL-C. Only 51% reported the same stressful event on both surveys. People who reported events occurring between the two surveys were more likely to record events from before the first survey which they had not previously mentioned (OR 1.48, 95% CI (1.17, 1.88), p < 0.001), than those who did not. In people who initially had few PTSD symptoms, a higher level of psychological distress, was significantly associated with higher PCL-C scores a few years later. The reporting of stressful events varied over time indicating that while the impact of some stressors endure, others may increase or decline in importance. When screening for PTSD, it is important to consider both traumatic experiences on deployment and other stressful life events, as well as other mental health problems among military personnel, even if individuals do not exhibit symptoms of PTSD on an initial assessment.
    Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 06/2015; -1:1-10. DOI:10.1017/S2045796015000517 · 3.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In total, 10 299 participants responded [8711 regulars, 1588 reservists (including late responders ); 59% response rate]. Of the participants who completed phase 1 of the study, 5905 had been deployed to Op TELIC 1 before they completed the questionnaire (Hotopf et al. 2006). For phase 2, 9395 participants from phase 1 were available for follow-up, including 37 who returned a completed phase 1 questionnaire after the end of data collection. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the military is considered to be a stressful occupation, there are remarkably few studies that compare the prevalence of common mental disorder (CMD) between the military and the general population. This study examined the prevalence of probable CMD in a serving UK military sample compared to a general population sample of employed individuals. Method Data for the general population was from the 2003 and 2008 collections for the Health Survey for England (HSE) and for the serving military from phases 1 (2004���2006) and 2 (2007���2009) of the King's Centre for Military Health Research (KCMHR) cohort study. Probable CMD was assessed by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). The datasets were appended to calculate the odds of CMD in the military compared to the general population. The odds of probable CMD was approximately double in the military, when comparing phase 1 of the military study to the 2003 HSE [odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1���2.7], and phase 2 to the 2008 HSE (OR 2.3, 95% CI 2.0���2.6) after adjustment for sex, age, social class, education and marital status. Serving military personnel are more likely to endorse symptoms of CMD compared to those selected from a general population study as employed in other occupations, even after accounting for demographic characteristics. This difference may be partly explained by the context of the military study, with evidence from previous research for higher reports of symptoms from the GHQ in occupational compared to population studies, in addition to the role of predisposing characteristics.
    Psychological Medicine 01/2015; 45(09):1-11. DOI:10.1017/S0033291714002980 · 5.94 Impact Factor
Show more