Defining a Fall and Reasons for Falling: Comparisons Among the Views of Seniors, Health Care Providers, and the Research Literature

School of Kinesiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 3K7 Canada.
The Gerontologist (Impact Factor: 3.21). 07/2006; 46(3):367-76. DOI: 10.1093/geront/46.3.367
Source: PubMed


The purpose of this study was (a) to obtain information about the perceptions held by seniors and health care providers concerning what constitutes a fall and potential reasons for falling, and (b) to compare these perceptions to the research literature.
As part of a larger telephone survey, interviewers asked 477 community-dwelling seniors to define a fall and to provide reasons for falling. In addition, we interviewed 31 health care providers from the community on the same topics. In order to capture patterns in conceptualized thinking, we used content analysis to develop codes and categories for a fall definition and reasons for falling. We reviewed selected articles in order to obtain a comprehensive overview of fall definitions currently used in the research and prevention literature.
A fall had different meanings for different groups. Seniors and health care providers focused mainly on antecedents and consequences of falling, whereas researchers described the fall event itself. There were substantial differences between the reasons for falling as reported by seniors and the risk factors as identified in the research literature.
If not provided with an appropriate definition, seniors can interpret the meaning of a fall in many different ways. This has the potential to reduce the validity in studies comparing fallers to nonfallers. Research reports and prevention programs should always provide an operational definition of a fall. In communication between health care providers and seniors, an appropriate definition increases the possibility for early detection of seniors in greater need of care and services.

Download full-text


Available from: Aleksandra A Zecevic, Nov 18, 2015
  • Source
    • "Underfoot accidents can affect both sexes, but the lower bone mass and muscle strength exhibited by many post-menopausal women can increase their risk for injury in comparison to men (Davies et al., 2003; Manning, 1983). Underfoot injuries include falls caused by trips, which occur when a swinging leg is abruptly interrupted upon impact with an object or body part, and slips, which are the loss of heel friction and " skidding " of the supporting leg(s) (Davies et al., 2003; Manning, 1983; Redfern et al., 2001; Zecevic et al., 2006). Falls (both slips and trips) commonly cause fractures to bones of the wrist when an individual tries to break their impact with an outstretched hand (Nevitt and Cummings, 1993; Verma et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It was hypothesized that men and women living in the border provinces of the Roman Empire may have encountered different risks associated with their different occupations and activities. Limb bone trauma data were used to assess sex-based differences in physical hazards and evidence for fracture healing and treatment. Two hundred and ten skeletons were examined from a late 1st to early 4th century AD cemetery at Aquincum (Budapest, Hungary). Upper and lower limb bone fracture types, frequencies, distributions, and associated complications were recorded, and gendered patterns in injury risks were explored. Of the 23 fractures identified, both sexes had injuries indicative of falls; males exhibited the only injuries suggestive of higher-energy and more direct forces. Most fractures were well-healed with few complications. The extremity trauma at Aquincum suggests that people buried here experienced less hazardous physical activities than at other Roman provincial sites. The patterns of trauma indicate the occurrence of "traditional" gender roles, whereby male civilians participated in more physically dangerous activities than females. Additionally, treatment may have been equally accessible to men and women, but certain fracture types proved more challenging to reduce using the techniques available.
    International Journal of Paleopathology 12/2015; 11:75-91. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpp.2015.08.004 · 0.73 Impact Factor
    • "Prospective falls The primary outcome was prospective falls over a year using Kellogg's definition of a fall: " a fall is an event which results in a person coming to rest inadvertently on the ground or other lower level and other than as a consequence of the following: sustaining a violent blow, loss of consciousness, sudden onset of paralysis as in a stroke, or an epileptic seizure. " Zecevic et al., 2006 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Wii Balance Board has received increasing attention as a balance measurement tool; however its ability to prospectively predict falls is unknown. This exploratory study investigated the use of the Wii Balance Board and other clinical-based measures for prospectively predicting falls among community-dwelling older adults. Seventy-three community-dwelling men and women, aged 60-85years were followed-up over a year for falls. Standing balance was indexed by sway velocities measured using the Wii Balance Board interfaced with a laptop. Clinical-based measures included Short Physical Performance Battery, gait speed and Timed-Up-and-Go test. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the ability of the Wii Balance Board measure to complement the TUG test in fall screening. Individually, the study found Wii Balance Board anteroposterior (odds ratio 1.98, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.40, P=0.01) and mediolateral (odds ratio 2.80, 95% CI 1.10 to 7.13, p=0.03) sway velocity measures predictive of prospective falls. However, when each velocity measure was adjusted with body mass index and Timed-Up-and-Go, only anteroposterior sway velocity was predictive of prospective falls (odds ratio 2.21, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.14). A faster anteroposterior velocity was associated with increased odds of falling. Area-under-the-curves for Wii Balance Board sway velocities were 0.67 and 0.71 for anteroposterior and mediolateral respectively. The Wii Balance Board-derived anteroposterior sway velocity measure could complement existing clinical-based measures in predicting future falls among community-dwelling older adults. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number: ACTRN12610001099011. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 03/2015; 30(5). DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.03.006 · 1.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "When surveyed, older adults suggested that their balance, inattention and medical conditions were the most frequent reasons for falls (Zecevic et al. 2006). When interviewed about a recent fall in the hospital, the major reason patients said they fell was the need to use the toilet coupled with loss of balance and unexpected weakness (Carroll et al. in press). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper is a report of the development and testing of the Self-Efficacy for Preventing Falls Nurse and Assistant scales. Patient falls and fall-related injuries are traumatic ordeals for patients, family members and providers, and carry a toll for hospitals. Self-efficacy is an important factor in determining actions persons take and levels of performance they achieve. Performance of individual caregivers is linked to the overall performance of hospitals. Scales to assess nurses and certified nursing assistants' self-efficacy to prevent patients from falling would allow for targeting resources to increase SE, resulting in improved individual performance and ultimately decreased numbers of patient falls. Four phases of instrument development were carried out to (1) generate individual items from eight focus groups (four each nurse and assistant conducted in October 2007), (2) develop prototype scales, (3) determine content validity during a second series of four nurse and assistant focus groups (January 2008) and (4) conduct item analysis, paired t-tests, Student's t-tests and internal consistency reliability to refine and confirm the scales. Data were collected during February-December, 2008. The 11-item Self-Efficacy for Preventing Falls Nurse had an alpha of 0·89 with all items in the range criterion of 0·3-0·7 for item total correlation. The 8-item Self-Efficacy for Preventing Falls Assistant had an alpha of 0·74 and all items had item total correlations in the 0·3-0·7 range. The Self-Efficacy for Preventing Falls Nurse and Self-Efficacy for Preventing Falls Assistant scales demonstrated psychometric adequacy and are recommended to measure bedside staff's self-efficacy beliefs in preventing patient falls.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 11/2010; 67(2):438-49. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05501.x · 1.74 Impact Factor
Show more