Article
Epidemiologic changes and economic burden of hypertension in Latin America: evidence from Mexico.
Center for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad 655, Col. Sta. Maria Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Norelos, CP 62508n, México.
American Journal of Hypertension (impact factor:
3.18).
06/2006;
19(6):553-9.
DOI:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.028
pp.553-9
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (2)
-
Article: Oportunidades program participation and body mass index, blood pressure, and self-reported health in Mexican adults.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Governments around the world are seeking to address the increasing prevalence of obesity and hypertension. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of an incentive-based development program (Oportunidades, formerly Progresa) on body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, and self-reported health. An intervention group of low-income (below the 20th percentile nationally), rural, Mexican adults (aged 30-65 years) (n = 5280) received program benefits (cash transfers contingent on positive changes in health behavior such as regular health checkups) for 3.5 to 5.0 years. They were compared with a newly recruited control group of adults (n = 1063) who had not yet begun receiving benefits. Analyses were adjusted for almost 50 social and economic covariates. Age- and sex-adjusted BMI was lower in adults from intervention communities than in those from control communities (26.57 kg/m(2) vs 27.16 kg/m(2), P < .001), as was the prevalence of obesity (20.28% vs 25.31%, P < .001) and overweight (59.24% vs 63.04%, P = .03); these results were attenuated after covariates were included. Adults in intervention communities had a lower combined prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension (33.80% vs 34.52%, P = .008) when adjusting for all covariates. Mean systolic (beta = -2.60, P < .001) and diastolic (beta = -2.84, P < .001) blood pressures were significantly lower in the intervention communities after all covariates were included, and self-reported health outcomes were better. Participation in Oportunidades, a large-scale cash-transfer program, was associated with lower prevalence of obesity and hypertension and better self-reported health in adults in rural Mexico.Preventing chronic disease 07/2008; 5(3):A81. · 1.82 Impact Factor -
Article: Impact of insurance and supply of health professionals on coverage of treatment for hypertension in Mexico: population based study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To examine the independent and combined contributions of insurance status and supply of health professionals on coverage of antihypertensive treatment among adults in Mexico. Population based study. Mexico. 4032 hypertensive adults (2967 uninsured and 1065 insured): 1065 uninsured adults matched with 1065 adults insured through Seguro Popular, a programme to expand health insurance coverage to uninsured people in Mexico. Coverage of antihypertensive treatment and coverage of antihypertensive treatment with control of blood pressure. Rates of treatment for hypertension varied by insurance status and supply of health professionals. Hypertensive adults insured through Seguro Popular had a significantly higher probability of receiving antihypertensive treatment (odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 1.78) and receiving antihypertensive treatment with control of blood pressure (1.35, 1.00 to 1.82). Greater supply of health professionals in areas with coverage through Seguro Popular was a significant predictor of antihypertensive treatment after adjusting for covariates (1.49, 1.00 to 2.20). Expansion of healthcare coverage to uninsured people in Mexico was associated with greater use of antihypertensive treatment and blood pressure control, particularly in areas with a greater supply of health professionals.BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 11/2007; 335(7625):875.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
Box-Jenkins technique
consensus techniques
cost evaluation method
current risk factors
different health programs
economic impact
financial burden
financial consequences
financial resources
greater increase
health care services
health services
health systems
internal competition
Latin America
Mexican health care system
relevant financial factor
risk factors
social security system
total health budget