Laboratory versus Portable Sleep Studies: A Meta-Analysis

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
The Laryngoscope (Impact Factor: 2.14). 07/2006; 116(6):859-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000214866.32050.2e
Source: PubMed


The objective of this meta-analysis study was to compare the accuracy of home sleep studies with laboratory polysomnography in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Eligible studies included prospective cohort studies of portable and in-laboratory sleep studies performed on the same groups of patients. A comparison of respiratory disturbance index (RDI), mean low oxygen saturation levels, sleep time, rate of inadequate studies, and average cost per examination was made between portable and in-laboratory sleep studies. A total of 18 papers were identified in two independent Medline searches.
RDI values on portable sleep studies were 10% lower on average compared with laboratory studies (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.92). There was no significant difference in the mean low oxygen saturation on portable versus laboratory studies (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10). Recorded sleep time was significantly higher by 13% for laboratory compared with portable studies (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86-0.89), and portable studies were significantly more likely to give a poor recording when compared with laboratory examinations (P = .0001). The cost of home studies ranged from 35% to 88% lower than laboratory studies across a number of countries.
Home sleep studies provide similar diagnostic information to laboratory polysomnograms in the evaluation of sleep-disordered breathing but may underestimate sleep apnea severity. The lower cost of home sleep studies makes it a viable screening tool for patients with suspected OSA; however, these lower costs are partially offset by the higher rate of inadequate examinations.

1 Follower
7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ObjectiveThis study was designed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a portable sleep apnea recording device (ApneaLink™) using standard polysomnography (PSG) as a reference and to evaluate the possibility of using the ApneaLink™ as a case selection technique for patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Materials and methodsFifty patients (mean age 48.7 ± 12.6years, 32 males) were recruited during a 4-week period. A simultaneous recording of both the standard in-laboratory PSG and an ambulatory level 4 sleep monitor (ApneaLink™) was performed during an overnight study for each patient. PSG sleep and respiratory events were scored manually according to standard criteria. ApneaLink™ data were analyzed either with the automated computerized algorithm provided by the manufacturer following the American Academy of Sleep Medicine standards (default setting DFAL) or The University of British Columbia Hospital sleep laboratory standards (alternative setting, ATAL). The ApneaLink respiratory disturbance indices (RDI), PSG apnea–hypopnea indices (AHI), and PSG oxygen desaturation index (ODI) were compared. ResultsThe mean PSG-AHI was 30.0 ± 25.8 events per hour. The means of DFAL-RDI and ATAL-RDI were 23.8 ± 21.9 events per hour and 29.5 ± 22.2 events per hour, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.958 between PSG-AHI and DFAL-RDI and 0.966 between PSG-AHI and ATAL-RDI. Receiver operator characteristic curves were constructed using a variety of PSG-AHI cutoff values (5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 events per hour). Optimal combinations of sensitivity and specificity for the various cutoffs were 97.7/66.7, 95.0/90.0, 87.5/88.9, 88.0/88.0, and 88.2/93.9, respectively for the default setting. The ApneaLink™ demonstrated the best agreement with laboratory PSG data at cutoffs of AHI ≥ 10. There were no significant differences among PSG-AHI, DFAL-RDI, and ATAL-RDI when all subjects were considered as one group. ODI at 2%, 3%, and 4% desaturation levels showed significant differences (p < 0.05) compared with PSG-AHI, DFAL-RDI, and ATAL-RDI for the entire group. ConclusionThe ApneaLink™ is an ambulatory sleep monitor that can detect OSA and/or hypopnea with acceptable reliability. The screening and diagnostic capability needs to be verified by further evaluation and manual scoring of the ApneaLink™. It could be a better choice than traditional oximetry in terms of recording respiratory events, although severity may be under- or overestimated.
    Sleep And Breathing 08/2009; 13(3):213-219. DOI:10.1007/s11325-008-0232-4 · 2.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder is a common diagnosis among children. Symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder include inattention, motor restlessness, and impulsivity. Associated cognitive difficulties are also common. These symptoms are not specific to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and may also manifest in the behavior of children with sleep disorders such as restless legs syndrome, periodic limb movement disorder, and obstructive sleep apnea. Unfortunately, sleep disorders are not routinely considered as a differential diagnosis for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. Symptoms, causes, and treatments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, restless legs syndrome, periodic limb movement disorder, and obstructive sleep apnea are described and compared to illustrate similarities among the disorders. Practitioners are encouraged to assess their pediatric clients for symptoms of a sleep disorder when considering a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Guidelines for sleep pattern assessment are included and discussed as appropriate for use by the psychiatric nurse clinician in the clinical setting.
    Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 08/2006; 12(4):216-224. DOI:10.1177/1078390306295087 · 0.98 Impact Factor

  • The Laryngoscope 12/2006; 116(11):2096; author reply 2097. DOI:10.1097/01.mlg.0000240907.17274.ab · 2.14 Impact Factor
Show more