Flucytosine and Cryptococcosis: Which In Vitro Test Is the Best Predictor of Outcome?

Istituto di Igiene e Medicina Preventiva, Università degli Studi-IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore, Milano, Italy.
Journal of chemotherapy (Florence, Italy) (Impact Factor: 1.6). 05/2003; 15(2):124-8. DOI: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.2.124
Source: PubMed


The combination of flucytosine and amphotericin B is first choice treatment for active cryptococcosis. Because of innate or acquired resistance of Cryptococcus neoformans to flucytosine, in vitro testing is mandatory. Yeast nitrogen base (YNB) at pH 7.0 is the recommended medium for the broth microdilution test (NCCLS M27-A) and for the E-test. In order to verify if minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were able to predict treatment outcome, the susceptibility of 24 isolates from 21 patients treated with flucytosine alone or in combination was tested by the broth microdilution, agar dilution and E-test using YNB either at pH 7.0 or at pH 5.4. Only those MICs obtained on YNB pH 5.4 proved to correlate with treatment outcome. The present study suggests that in vitro susceptibility to flucytosine of C. neoformans isolates should be evaluated on YNB pH 5.4 and the test should be standardized accordingly.

1 Follower
12 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The in vitro susceptibilities of 21 Aspergillus isolates were tested against three antifungal agents in RPMI 1640 and yeast nitrogen base at pH 5.0 and 7.0 by a broth microdilution format of the NCCLS method. The MICs of amphotericin B and itraconazole were higher, while those of flucytosine were lower, at pH 5.0 than at pH 7.0. The poor correlation between in vitro results and clinical outcome could be due to a difference in pH between the in vitro susceptibility test and at the site of infection.
    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 09/2004; 48(8):3147-50. DOI:10.1128/AAC.48.8.3147-3150.2004 · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The persistence of high morbidity and mortality from systemic fungal infections despite the availability of novel antifungals points to the need for effective treatment strategies. Treatment of invasive fungal infections is often hampered by drug toxicity, tolerability, and specificity issues, and added complications often arise due to the lack of diagnostic tests and to treatment complexities. Combination therapy has been suggested as a possible approach to improve treatment outcome. In this article, we undertake a historical review of studies of combination therapy and also focus on recent studies involving newly approved antifungal agents. The limitations surrounding antifungal combinations include nonuniform interpretation criteria, inability to predict the likelihood of clinical success, strain variability, and variations in pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals used in combination. The issue of antagonism between polyenes and azoles is beginning to be addressed, but data regarding other drug combinations are not adequate for us to draw definite conclusions. However, recent data have identified potentially useful combinations. Standardization of assay methods and adoption of common interpretive criteria are essential to avoid discrepancies between different in vitro studies. Larger clinical trials are needed to assess whether combination therapy improves survival and treatment outcome in the most seriously debilitated patients afflicted with life-threatening fungal infections.
    Clinical Microbiology Reviews 02/2005; 18(1):163-94. DOI:10.1128/CMR.18.1.163-194.2005 · 17.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, we investigated the pH dependency of the in vitro activities of amphotericin B (AMB) and flucytosine (5FC) against Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, Aspergillus fumigatus, Rhizopus spp., and Scedosporium prolificans in RPMI 1640 buffered with citrate buffer (pH 4.0, 5.0, 5.4, and 6.0), citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 5.4, 6.0, 6.4, and 7.0), and 3-[N-morpholino]propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (pH 6.4, 7.0, 7.4, and 7.9). For 5FC, no significant differences were found between MICs obtained with the different buffers, while for AMB, significant differences were found. The MICs obtained with citrate-phosphate buffer were approximately 1 twofold-dilution step higher than the MICs obtained with MOPS. We demonstrated that the in vitro activities of AMB and 5FC against yeast and mold isolates were pH dependent. The in vitro activity of AMB decreased when the pH was lowered, while the in vitro activity of 5FC increased. The effect of the pH on the in vitro activities was dependent not only on the antifungal agent tested but also on the microorganism. For AMB, there was a nonlinear relationship (median r(2), 0.864) for Candida spp., C. neoformans, A. fumigatus, and Rhizopus spp. over the pH range tested. The mean MICs ranged from 0.5 to 2.52 microg/ml at pH 7.0 and from 20.16 to 32 microg/ml at pH 5.0. For S. prolificans, there was no relationship. For 5FC, there was a linear relationship for Candida spp. (median r(2), 0.767) and a nonlinear relationship for C. neoformans and A. fumigatus (median r(2), 0.882) over the pH range tested. The mean MIC values ranged from 0.125 to 1,024 microg/ml at pH 7.0 and from 0.02 to 4 microg/ml at pH 5.0. For Rhizopus spp. and S. prolificans, the relationship could not be determined, since the MIC was >1,024 microg/ml over a pH range of 4.0 to 7.9.
    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 09/2005; 49(8):3341-6. DOI:10.1128/AAC.49.8.3341-3346.2005 · 4.48 Impact Factor
Show more