Article

Parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders

Women's Pelvic Medicine Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.37). 07/2006; 107(6):1253-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218096.54169.34
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study aimed to assess the associations between parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders.
The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and anal incontinence was assessed in a random sample of women aged 25-84 years by using the validated Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire. Women were categorized as nulliparous, vaginally parous, or only delivered by cesarean. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each disorder were calculated with logistic regression, controlling for age, body mass index, and parity.
In the 4,458 respondents the prevalence of each disorder was as follows: 7% prolapse, 15% stress urinary incontinence, 13% overactive bladder, 25% anal incontinence, and 37% for any one or more pelvic floor disorders. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of disorders between the cesarean delivery and nulliparous groups. The adjusted odds of each disorder increased with vaginal parity compared with cesarean delivery: prolapse = 1.82 (95% CI 1.04-3.19), stress urinary incontinence = 1.81 (95% CI 1.25-2.61), overactive bladder = 1.53 (95% CI 1.02-2.29), anal incontinence = 1.72 (95% CI 1.27-2.35), and any one or more pelvic floor disorders = 1.85 (95% CI 1.42-2.41). Number-needed-to-treat analysis revealed that 7 women would have to deliver only by cesarean delivery to prevent one woman from having a pelvic floor disorder.
The risk of pelvic floor disorders is independently associated with vaginal delivery but not with parity alone. Cesarean delivery has a protective effect, similar to nulliparity, on the development of pelvic floor disorders when compared with vaginal delivery.
II-2.

0 Followers
 · 
133 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), although seems to be simple, is a complex process that develops secondary to multifactorial factors. The incidence of PFD is increasing with increasing life expectancy. PFD is a term that refers to a broad range of clinical scenarios, including lower urinary tract excretory and defecation disorders, such as urinary and anal incontinence, overactive bladder, and pelvic organ prolapse, as well as sexual disorders. It is a financial burden on the health care system and disrupts women's quality of life. Strategies applied to decrease PFD are focused on the course of pregnancy, mode and management of delivery, and pelvic exercise methods. Many studies in the literature define traumatic birth, usage of forceps, length of the second stage of delivery, and sphincter damage as modifiable risk factors for PFD. Maternal age, fetal position, and fetal head circumference are nonmodifiable risk factors. Although numerous studies show that vaginal delivery affects pelvic floor structures and their functions in a negative way, there is not enough scientific evidence to recommend elective cesarean delivery in order to prevent development of PFD. PFD is a heterogeneous pathological condition, and the effects of pregnancy, vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, and possible risk factors of PFD may be different from each other. Observational studies have identified certain obstetrical exposures as risk factors for pelvic floor disorders. These factors often coexist; therefore, the isolated effects of these variables on the pelvic floor are difficult to study. The routine use of episiotomy for many years in order to prevent PFD is not recommended anymore; episiotomy should be used in selected cases, and the mediolateral procedures should be used if needed. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Problems with sexual function have been reported to occur commonly in women with pelvic organ prolapsed. The aim of this study was to assess the sexual function in women who underwent surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapsed. Methods: This is a before after study in which fifty legible patients suffering from pelvic organ prolapsed were assessed for sexual function) before surgery and three month after surgery. The data were collected through a demographic questionnaire, midwifery history and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The collected data were analyzed through paired T-test, chi-square and multiple linear regressions. Results: Mean FSFI total score improved from baseline 19±10.8 to 23.8±5.2 (P=0.01). Domain scores of desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain were increased significantly (P<0.05). Conclusion: Sexuality improved following surgery for either prolapsed or urinary incontinence, or both. It’s important to counsel women with POP for undergoing surgery.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine which maternal characteristics or birth events independently predict severity of levator ani muscle (LA) tears at first vaginal birth in a longitudinal/observational investigation in a tertiary care hospital.
    Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 04/2014; 4(6):266-278. DOI:10.4236/ojog.2014.46043

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
271 Downloads
Available from
May 29, 2014