Parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders

Women's Pelvic Medicine Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.37). 07/2006; 107(6):1253-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218096.54169.34
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study aimed to assess the associations between parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders.
The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and anal incontinence was assessed in a random sample of women aged 25-84 years by using the validated Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire. Women were categorized as nulliparous, vaginally parous, or only delivered by cesarean. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each disorder were calculated with logistic regression, controlling for age, body mass index, and parity.
In the 4,458 respondents the prevalence of each disorder was as follows: 7% prolapse, 15% stress urinary incontinence, 13% overactive bladder, 25% anal incontinence, and 37% for any one or more pelvic floor disorders. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of disorders between the cesarean delivery and nulliparous groups. The adjusted odds of each disorder increased with vaginal parity compared with cesarean delivery: prolapse = 1.82 (95% CI 1.04-3.19), stress urinary incontinence = 1.81 (95% CI 1.25-2.61), overactive bladder = 1.53 (95% CI 1.02-2.29), anal incontinence = 1.72 (95% CI 1.27-2.35), and any one or more pelvic floor disorders = 1.85 (95% CI 1.42-2.41). Number-needed-to-treat analysis revealed that 7 women would have to deliver only by cesarean delivery to prevent one woman from having a pelvic floor disorder.
The risk of pelvic floor disorders is independently associated with vaginal delivery but not with parity alone. Cesarean delivery has a protective effect, similar to nulliparity, on the development of pelvic floor disorders when compared with vaginal delivery.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective FBLN5 encodes a key protein of elastic fiber matrix assembly and function that contributes to maintaining pelvic support and plays the important role in the pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is an association between common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the FBLN5 gene and POP. Study design: A total of eleven tag SNPs of the FBLN5 gene were genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction with confronting two-pair primers (PCR–CTPP) in 210 patients with POP (stages III–IV) and 292 controls with no even minimal POP. Results We revealed significant associations of tag SNPs rs2018736 and rs12589592 with POP. The top association signal was found for SNP rs2018736 (protective effect for the minor allele A) in the entire set: P = 0.0026, OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24–0.75; in the stratum with pelvic floor trauma: P = 0.0018, OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11–0.64; and in the stratum with fetal macrosomia: P = 0.013, OR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03–0.71. The results of the haplotype analyses were consistent with the single SNP analysis. In the strata without perineal trauma and fetal macrosomia effects were non-significant, possibly, due to the smaller effect sizes. Conclusions Current data provide, for the first time, strong evidence that common SNPs of the FBLN5 gene are associated with POP especially after pelvic floor injury.
    Maturitas 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.05.003 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), although seems to be simple, is a complex process that develops secondary to multifactorial factors. The incidence of PFD is increasing with increasing life expectancy. PFD is a term that refers to a broad range of clinical scenarios, including lower urinary tract excretory and defecation disorders, such as urinary and anal incontinence, overactive bladder, and pelvic organ prolapse, as well as sexual disorders. It is a financial burden on the health care system and disrupts women's quality of life. Strategies applied to decrease PFD are focused on the course of pregnancy, mode and management of delivery, and pelvic exercise methods. Many studies in the literature define traumatic birth, usage of forceps, length of the second stage of delivery, and sphincter damage as modifiable risk factors for PFD. Maternal age, fetal position, and fetal head circumference are nonmodifiable risk factors. Although numerous studies show that vaginal delivery affects pelvic floor structures and their functions in a negative way, there is not enough scientific evidence to recommend elective cesarean delivery in order to prevent development of PFD. PFD is a heterogeneous pathological condition, and the effects of pregnancy, vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, and possible risk factors of PFD may be different from each other. Observational studies have identified certain obstetrical exposures as risk factors for pelvic floor disorders. These factors often coexist; therefore, the isolated effects of these variables on the pelvic floor are difficult to study. The routine use of episiotomy for many years in order to prevent PFD is not recommended anymore; episiotomy should be used in selected cases, and the mediolateral procedures should be used if needed. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine which maternal characteristics or birth events independently predict severity of levator ani muscle (LA) tears at first vaginal birth in a longitudinal/observational investigation in a tertiary care hospital.
    Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 04/2014; 4(6):266-278. DOI:10.4236/ojog.2014.46043

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014