Bone marrow aspiration before bone marrow core biopsy using the same bone marrow biopsy needle: a good or bad practice?

Division of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Buffalo General Hospital, NY 14203, USA.
Journal of Clinical Pathology (Impact Factor: 2.55). 03/2007; 60(2):212-5. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2006.037341
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A single-needle single-site technique for bone marrow aspiration and core biopsy has been compared with a two-needle technique, using 30 randomly selected patients who required these two investigations. In addition, two single-needle techniques were compared, aspirating immediately after penetrating the cortex or, alternatively, aspirating after the needle (without the stilette) had been advanced 20-25 mm. The two-needle technique was found to be superior to either of the single-needle techniques, which often resulted in a biopsy specimen that was denuded of bone marrow cells.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The bone marrow is frequently involved in variety of cases presenting with hematological and non-hematological disorders, which are diagnosed by two separate but interrelated techniques such as bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and bone marrow biopsy (BMB).
    Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 08/2014; 8(8):FC13-6.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Context.-Bone marrow examination is essential for diagnosis and staging of hematologic disorders. Traditionally, the bone marrow biopsy and aspirate are obtained with 2 needles at 2 separate sites. This approach is associated with significant discomfort, procedural time, and occasionally, morbidity. Although previous observations had suggested that a single-needle technique at one site is a simpler and less-painful procedure, there had been concern that the 1-needle technique may yield a suboptimal biopsy for diagnosis. Objective.-To conduct a systematic comparison of multiple parameters of bone marrow biopsy specimens obtained by the traditional 2-needle technique versus the 1-needle technique for bone marrow collection. Design.-We retrospectively evaluated 20 biopsy specimens obtained by each of the 2 mentioned techniques by comparing the morphologic quality of the biopsy, biopsy length, and biopsy cellularity. Results.-We found that the 1-needle technique yielded an adequate biopsy for diagnosis. The measured parameters of the samples obtained by the 1-needle versus 2-needle techniques were similar. Conclusion.-This study suggests that the 1-needle technique may be preferred for bone marrow aspirate and biopsy.
    Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 07/2013; 137(7):974-8. · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bone marrow biopsy is generally a safe procedure. However, infrequently the procedure is associated with serious injuries that are attributed to inadvertent needle penetration of the iliac bone's inner cortex. An evidence-based approach to needle orientation during iliac crest biopsy does not exist. In our study, the posterior to anterior path of the bone marrow needle from the posterior superior iliac spine was studied in human cadavers in two orientations: (1) perpendicularly to the coronal plane (the perpendicular approach) and (2) laterally toward the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (the lateral approach). The biopsy needle was deliberately advanced through the inner ilial cortex in both approaches. Dissections and imaging studies were done to identify the relationship of the penetrating needle to internal structures. Both approaches begin with a perpendicular puncture of the outer cortex at the posterior superior iliac spine. The perpendicular approach proceeds anteriorly whereas in the lateral approach the needle is reoriented towards the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine before advancing. The lateral approach caused less damage to neurovascular structures and avoided the sacroiliac joint compared to the perpendicular approach. This procedure is best done in the lateral decubitus position. Proper use of the lateral approach should obviate many of the complications reported in the literature.
    American Journal of Hematology 06/2014; 89(10). · 3.48 Impact Factor


Available from