Independent extended and supplementary nurse prescribing practice in the UK: A national questionnaire survey

University of Reading, UK.
International Journal of Nursing Studies (Impact Factor: 2.25). 10/2007; 44(7):1093-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Nurses are able to prescribe independently from a list of nearly 250 prescription only medicines for a range of over 100 medical conditions or, from the whole British National Formulary as a supplementary prescriber. There is some evidence available on the prescribing practices of district nurses and health visitors and early independent extended prescribers. Little or no attention has focussed on supplementary nurse prescribing.
To provide an overview of the prescribing practices of independent extended/supplementary nurse prescribers and the factors that facilitate or inhibit prescribing.
National questionnaire survey.
United Kingdom.
A convenience sample of 868 qualified independent extended/supplementary nurse prescribers self-completed a written questionnaire.
A total of 756 (87%) used independent extended prescribing; 304 (35%) used supplementary prescribing to treat a range of chronic conditions (including asthma, diabetes and hypertension); 710 (82%) nurses worked in primary care. Nurses in general practice reported the largest number of reasons preventing prescribing. Reasons included the inability to computer generate prescriptions and to implement the Clinical Management Plan. Nurses in primary care reported more continuing professional development needs. These needs included update on prescribing policy and the treatment management of conditions. A total of 277 (32%) nurses were unable to access continuing professional development.
Independent extended/supplementary nurse prescribers work predominantly in primary care and do prescribe medicines. These nurses are highly qualified and have many years clinical experience. Supplementary prescribing is used by a minority of nurses. Implementing the Clinical Management Plan is a barrier preventing the use of this mode of prescribing. The continuing professional development needs of independent extended/supplementary nurse prescribers are frequently unmet. It will become increasingly important that these needs are met once nurses are able to prescribe the full range of medicines included in the British National Formulary, limited only by their area of competence.

Download full-text


Available from: Molly Courtenay, Aug 26, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: General practice has undergone considerable change in the last two decades. New roles for nurses working in general practice have extended to include tasks that were previously delivered by general practitioners, in particular chronic disease management, and the development of new, advanced roles such as independent nurse prescribing. There have been few research studies investigating the impact of these changes, especially after the introduction of the new General Medical Services contract in April 2004. The overall aim of the work presented in this thesis was to examine the emerging roles of practice nurses, the forces influencing that development, and the effects of these changes on doctor-nurse skill mix in general practice within NHS Scotland. The work employed a mixed methods approach, with three inter-linked studies. The first study was a quantitative, desk-based analysis of workload and clinical activities of doctors and nurses working in 37 practices across Scotland for the year 2002. The second study was a postal questionnaire to all practice nurses working within NHS Greater Glasgow (n=329), conducted in autumn 2005 and achieving a 61% response rate. The third study was a qualitative study, consisting of eighteen interviews with a doctor and nurse inform each of nine general practices. The interviews were conducted between January and July 2006 and practices were selected according to the number of partners and the deprivation status of the practice population. Analysis of workload data showed that practice nurses and general practitioners dealt with 27.5% and 72.5% of total face-to-face encounters, respectively. Many of the encounters with nurses involved chronic disease management, with 20% of such encounters appearing similar in content to the work of GPs. The postal survey found that one third of practice nurses were aged over 50, and will be approaching retirement within 10 years. The majority worked in small teams of nurses, although 31% worked alone. This may have contributed to the finding that 52% (n=103) reported feeling isolated in their workplace. Many had attended CPD training on chronic conditions, but identified minor illness treatment as an area for future training. The qualitative study showed that the Quality and Outcomes Framework of the 2004 contract had been a key driver of changes in general practice service delivery. This has led to an increasing shift in routine care from doctors to nurses. As new roles for practice nurses have evolved, GPs have been able to focus on treating complex morbidities that need medical diagnosis and intervention. The incentivised targets of the new contract have made chronic disease management a predominant activity for practice nurses, with treatment room and non-incentivised activities featuring less and increasingly being provided by new, lower grade nurses or nurse replacements such as Health Care Support Workers (HCSW). There was no consensus between interview participants in terms of the most appropriate use of doctor-nurse skill mix in general practice. Nor did they agree on the merit of advanced roles for practice nurses. However, respondents did emphasise that nurses who wanted to have an independent/advanced role in the practice would need to combine three competencies (independent nurse prescribing, triaging, and minor illness treatment). Most practice nurses interviewed were concerned with obtaining a fair financial return to match their increasing responsibilities, especially after the introduction of the nGMS contract. GPs, however, tended to believe that nurses were appropriately remunerated for the level of responsibility they had within the practice. The continuing role of the GP as the employer of practice nurses was problematic for some nurses and many felt there would be advantages to being employed on Agenda for Change terms and conditions. However, the majority of nurses interviewed preferred being employed by a GP rather than the Health Board. There was little support amongst either nurses or GPs for the notion of nurse partners within practices. Overall, these studies provide lessons which will be of value in planning the future training and development of practice nurses. It suggests that practice nurses should obtain proper training and support in order to meet their individual needs and to carry out new responsibilities and roles. In addition, the impending shortage of practice nurses due to retirement, lack of retention and potential recruitment difficulties needs to be addressed urgently at the level of primary care policy and manpower planning.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of nurse prescriber has been recognised in the community since the 1990s but it was only in 2002 that it was extended to acute care. At the time of the study, little was known about the impact and effectiveness of nurse prescribing in the acute setting. To evaluate the implementation of nurse prescribing roles at an acute trust in England. A mixed-methods, single-case study was carried out in 2005-06. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 hospital staff, two doctors and two nurses undertaking 52 patient-prescriber consultations involving 47 patients were observed, and 74 patients were surveyed using a questionnaire. Nurse prescribing was found to benefit patients through improvements in service delivery and better use of staff skills. No differences were found between the ways in which doctors and nurses performed prescribing roles but there was between the medicine-related satisfaction ratings of patients seen by a nurse compared with those seen by a doctor. Nurses and doctors provided equivalent care. Nurse prescribers were crucial to the success of the initiative because of their enthusiasm, motivation, drive to succeed and a shared vision supporting prescribing roles.
    Nursing times 107(26):18-9.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: THE INTEGRATION OF NURSE PRESCRIBING IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CARE. Nurse independent and supplementary prescribers have legal authority to prescribe all licensed and unlicensed medicines with some minor restriction to prescribing controlled drugs. These prescribing rights are similar to those of doctors. To be effective, the integration of nurse prescribing must be consistent with the legal framework for nurse prescribing and, be acceptable to the nurse, employer, patient and healthcare team. There is little known about how prescribing is integrated in practice but agreements are potentially important to the organisation of professional work and may ultimately affect patient safety. These case studies set out to investigate how nurse prescribers integrate prescribing in primary and secondary care. Each case, a nurse prescriber,had completed the independent and supplementary prescribing course at one university between September 2004 and January 2007. Of the 26 cases recruited 13 had been qualified to prescribe for between 7 and 13 months, and 13 for 14 and 26 months. Data collected through semistructured interviews, field notes and attribute data was drawn together in case summaries. Data analysis showed effective integration to be dependent upon professional relationships and prescribing role agreements. Prescribers outlined three approaches to integrate prescribing. These were; prescribing as the opportunity presents, prescribing for specific conditions and prescribing for individuals. Prescribing as the opportunity presents reflects medical models of prescribing. Condition specific and individual approaches restrict prescribing to specific medical condition(s)or individual patients. These nurse prescribers preferred to use Independent prescribing. Reflecting this, prescribers showed higher levels of dependence on doctors than previously reported. This was most common in the first year of prescribing. Relationships between nurse prescribers and the team were important. New nurse prescribers raised unexpected issues in some intraprofessional relationships. However, it was the inter-professional relationship between nurse and doctor that determined integration. The nurse must believe, trust exists and is reciprocal to integrate prescribing in practice. Where there was an absence of trust or a concern of mistrust the nurse would not integrate prescribing.
Show more