Land SR, Wickerham DL, Costantino JP, et al. Patient-reported symptoms and quality of life during treatment with tamoxifen or raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial

Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 35.29). 06/2006; 295(23):2742-51. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.23.joc60075
Source: PubMed


Tamoxifen has been approved for breast cancer risk reduction in high-risk women, but how raloxifene compares with tamoxifen is unknown.
To compare the differences in patient-reported outcomes, quality of life [QOL], and symptoms in Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) participants by treatment assignment. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: STAR was a double-blind, randomized phase 3 prevention trial designed to evaluate the relative efficacy of raloxifene vs tamoxifen in reducing the incidence of invasive breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women. Between July 1, 1999, and November 4, 2004, 19,747 participants were enrolled at centers throughout North America, with a median potential follow-up time of 4.6 years (range, 1.2-6.5 years). Patient-reported symptoms were collected from all participants using a 36-item symptom checklist. Quality of life was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D), and the Medical Outcomes Study Sexual Activity Questionnaire in a substudy of 1983 participants, median potential follow-up 5.4 years (range, 4.6-6.0 years). Questionnaires were administered before treatment, every 6 months for 60 months and at 72 months.
Primary QOL end points were the SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries.
Among women in the QOL analysis, mean PCS, MCS, and CES-D scores worsened modestly over the study's 60 months, with no significant difference between the tamoxifen (n = 973) and raloxifene (n = 1010) groups (P>.2). Sexual function was slightly better for participants assigned to tamoxifen (age-adjusted repeated measure odds ratio, 1.22%; 95% CI, 1.01-1.46). Of the women in the symptom assessment analyses, the 9769 in the raloxifene group reported greater mean symptom severity over 60 months of assessments than the 9743 in the tamoxifen group for musculoskeletal problems (1.15 vs 1.10, P = .002), dyspareunia (0.78 vs 0.68, P<.001), and weight gain (0.82 vs 0.76, P<.001). Women in the tamoxifen group reported greater mean symptom severity for gynecological problems (0.29 vs 0.19, P<.001), vasomotor symptoms (0.96 vs 0.85, P<.001), leg cramps (1.10 vs 0.91, P<.001), and bladder control symptoms (0.88 vs 0.73, P<.001).
No significant differences existed between the tamoxifen and raloxifene groups in patient-reported outcomes for physical health, mental health, and depression, although the tamoxifen group reported better sexual function. Although mean symptom severity was low among these postmenopausal women, those in the tamoxifen group reported more gynecological problems, vasomotor symptoms, leg cramps, and bladder control problems, whereas women in the raloxifene group reported more musculoskeletal problems, dyspareunia, and weight gain. Identifier: NCT00003906.

10 Reads
  • Source
    • "Analysis of quality of life data from the Study of Raloxifene and Tamoxifen (STAR) prevention trial found that a higher percentage of women randomized to the tamoxifen arm remained sexually active compared to women in the raloxifene arm. Among sexually active participants, women randomized to the raloxifene group experienced significantly more dyspareunia, greater difficulties with sexual interest, sexual arousal, and sexual enjoyment, but no significant difference in the ability to experience an orgasm [19]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As the number of breast cancer survivors increases, the long term consequences of breast cancer treatment are gaining attention. Sexual dysfunction is a common complaint amongst breast cancer survivors, and there are few evidence based recommendations and even fewer well designed clinical trials to establish what treatments are safe or effective in this patient population. We conducted a PubMed search for articles published between 1995-2009 containing the terms breast cancer, sexual dysfunction, libido, vaginal dryness, testosterone, and vaginal estrogen. We initially reviewed articles focusing exclusively on sexual issues in breast cancer patients. Given the paucity of clinical trials addressing sexual issues in breast cancer patients, we also included studies evaluating both hormone and non-hormone based interventions for sexual dysfunction in post-menopausal women in general. Among breast cancer survivors, vaginal dryness and loss of libido represent some of the most challenging long term side effects of breast cancer treatment. In the general post-menopausal population, topical preparations of estrogens and testosterone both appear to improve sexual function; however there are conflicting reports about the efficacy and safety of these interventions in women with a history of breast cancer, and further research is warranted.
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship 09/2010; 4(3):247-55. DOI:10.1007/s11764-010-0130-1 · 3.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "32. Phillips K. A., M. A. Jenkins, G. J. Lindeman, S. A. McLachlan, J. M. McKinley, P. C. Weideman, J. L. Hopper, M. L. Friedlander. 2006."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment approach for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, where primary disease downstaging clears improves operability. Previously unresectable disease may then be controlled by mastectomy, and some patients may even become eligible for lumpectomy. The disease downstaging benefits as well as the ability to determine chemosensitivity, have motivated expanded applications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to include selected cases of early-stage breast cancer. In this setting, many women will become improved candidates for breast conservation surgery performed via smaller-volume lumpectomies. Optimal utilization of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy approach requires special attention by the surgeon regarding diagnostic biopsies (percutaneous needle biopsies are preferred); preoperative planning (insertion of radio-opaque clips to mark tumor bed prior to completion of chemotherapy response; careful imaging to determine extent of disease); and final surgical decision-making (including comprehensive preoperative imaging to decide between lumpectomy and mastectomy).
    Cancer treatment and research 02/2008; 141:79-98. DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-73161-2_6
  • Source
    • "32. Phillips K. A., M. A. Jenkins, G. J. Lindeman, S. A. McLachlan, J. M. McKinley, P. C. Weideman, J. L. Hopper, M. L. Friedlander. 2006."
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The development of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) using whole-breast irradiation (WBI) to eradicate residual disease following nonablative resection of breast cancer was one of the great success stories of twentieth-century oncology. Approximately 70-80% of patients with stage I or II invasive breast cancers are estimated to be potential candidates on technical grounds for BCT.
    Cancer treatment and research 02/2008; 141:135-48. DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-73161-2_9
Show more