Article

Thromboprophylaxis in microsurgery.

Dpts of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Acta chirurgica Belgica (Impact Factor: 0.36). 106(2):158-64.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Microsurgical free tissue transfer has become a gold standard in a wide range of clinical situations. Thrombosis at the anastomotic site is not only the most common cause of failure of microsurgical operations, but it is also one of the factors resulting in microcirculatory intravascular thrombosis in free flaps. All conditions of thrombus formation, defined by Virchow in 1856, are encountered in free flap surgery. This literature review concerns the problem of thromboprophylaxis in microsurgery. All citations published this last ten years (1996-2005) concerning this problem are noted. Data are confronted with other specialties, particularly vascular surgery, or with large retrospective studies. Protocol used in our institution is presented at the end of this lecture.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
76 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In free tissue transfers, preventing microvascular thrombosis is the first priority to achieve a successful result. Numerous protocols exist for preventing thrombosis postoperatively. We performed continuous local intraarterial infusion of anticoagulants in 11 patients undergoing wide resection of malignant soft tissue tumors, followed by primary microvascular reconstruction in the lower limb. A catheter designed for epidural anesthesia was inserted into the femoral artery and connected to a syringe pump. A daily dose of 100 ml comprising 2,000 U of heparin and 40 microg of prostaglandin E(1) was administered by means of continuous infusion for seven consecutive days as a standard regime. There were no cases of thrombosis during the continuous local intraarterial infusion of anticoagulants. There were no serious systemic complications. Although we have described limited cases and supporting data are lacking, we feel that this procedure might be useful for microsurgical reconstruction of the lower limb.
    Microsurgery 07/2010; 30(5):376-9. · 1.62 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: No consensus exists among microsurgeons regarding the role of intravenous (IV) heparin in digital replantation/revascularization. The current experience of the Provincial Replantation Center in Quebec was reviewed over a 4-year period. An initial retrospective review of all revascularized or reimplanted digits at our Replantation Center from April 2004 to April 2006 was conducted. Then, data of all patients treated at our center from January 08 to September 08 were prospectively collected. The two cohorts were compared with regards to demographics, injury characteristics, postoperative thromboprophylaxis medication as well as complication and success rates. Proportions were compared using χ(2) tests/Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate analysis was conducted with logistic regression. 175 digits were treated from April 2004 to April 2006, including 104 revascularizations and 71 amputations. IV heparin was used in 35.1% of the cases and was associated with a 3.59-fold (95% CI, 1.55-8.31) increase risk of developing a complication compared with cases where heparin was not used (P = 0.001). In 2008, 106 digits were treated. IV heparin was used in 14.6% of the cases and was not significantly associated with a higher complication rate compared with cases where heparin was not used (P = 0.612). Both cohorts' success rates were very similar (P = 0.557). The number of complications decreased from the first period (20.5%) to the second one (12.8%). Routine use of IV heparin following digital replantation and revascularization is not warranted. Surgical technique and type of injury remains the most important predictors for success in these complex procedures.
    Microsurgery 05/2011; 31(6):421-7. · 1.62 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thrombosis is still the first cause of microsurgery failure. Lots of publications have been made but no consensus exists. We first analysed the results of our study in 53 French expert surgeons, then we compared them with the last published datas, most of all, with the similar surveys. If a big majority (81 %) of the surgeons use a preventing method, we observed majors variations between them and also compared to the anglosaxons surgeons habits. This survey permits to make the point on today's practice and to show that some of them are based on low proof level and something even done without any medical references. After datas analysis, we observed that none of the medical treatments proved efficiency on preventing vascular thrombosis. The low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) could be used on postops without increase bleeding but not to lower specially the microvascular thrombosis rate. Aspirin did not improve the positive rates and its adjonction to LMWH increased the bleeding. Until scientific studies prove efficacy of a treatment, the surgeon has to make a personal choice: keeping habits or following evidence-based medicine.
    Chirurgie de la Main 03/2010; 29(2):100-8. · 0.30 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
704 Downloads
Available from
Dec 26, 2012