Article

The pre-M1 segment of the alpha1 subunit is a transduction element in the activation of the GABAA receptor.

CV Starr Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, A-1040, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
The Journal of Physiology (Impact Factor: 4.54). 09/2006; 575(Pt 1):11-22. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.102756
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The binding of the neurotransmitter GABA induces conformational changes in the GABAA receptor (GABAAR), leading to the opening of a gate that controls ion permeation through an integral transmembrane pore. A number of structural elements within each subunit, located near the membrane interface, are believed to undergo relative movements during this activation process. In this study, we explored the functional role of the beta-10 strand (pre-M1 segment), which connects the extracellular domain to the transmembrane domain. In alpha1beta2gamma2s GABAARs, analysis of the 12 residues of the beta-10 strand in the alpha1 subunit proximal to the first transmembrane domain identified two residues, alpha1V212 and alpha1K220, in which mutations produced rightward shifts in the GABA concentration-response relationship and also reduced the relative efficacy of the partial agonist, piperidine-4-sulphonic acid. Ultra-fast agonist techniques were applied to mutant alpha1(K220A)beta2gamma2s GABAARs and revealed that the macroscopic functional deficit in this mutant could be attributed to a slowing of the opening rate constant, from approximately 1500 s(-1) in wild-type (WT) channels to approximately 730 s(-1) in the mutant channels, and a reduction in the time spent in the active state for the mutant. These changes were accompanied by a decrease in agonist affinity, with half-maximal activation rates achieved at 0.77 mM GABA in WT and 1.4 mM GABA in the alpha1(K220A)beta2gamma2s channels. The beta-10 strand (pre-M1 segment) emerges, from this and other studies, as a key functional component in the activation of the GABAAR.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
73 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The family of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA(A)Rs) mediates two types of inhibition in the mammalian brain. Phasic inhibition is mediated by synaptic GABA(A)Rs that are mainly comprised of alpha(1), beta(2), and gamma(2) subunits, whereas tonic inhibition is mediated by extrasynaptic GABA(A)Rs comprised of alpha(4/6), beta(2), and delta subunits. We investigated the activation properties of recombinant alpha(4)beta(2)delta and alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A)Rs in response to GABA and 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3(2H)-one (THIP) using electrophysiological recordings from outside-out membrane patches. Rapid agonist application experiments indicated that THIP produced faster opening rates at alpha(4)beta(2)delta GABA(A)Rs (beta approximately 1600 s(-1)) than at alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A)Rs (beta approximately 460 s(-1)), whereas GABA activated alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A)Rs more rapidly (beta approximately 1800 s(-1)) than alpha(4)beta(2)delta GABA(A)Rs (beta < 440 s(-1)). Single channel recordings of alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) and alpha(4)beta(2)delta GABA(A)Rs showed that both channels open to a main conductance state of approximately 25 pS at -70 mV when activated by GABA and low concentrations of THIP, whereas saturating concentrations of THIP elicited approximately 36 pS openings at both channels. Saturating concentrations of GABA elicited brief (<10 ms) openings with low intraburst open probability (P(O) approximately 0.3) at alpha(4)beta(2)delta GABA(A)Rs and at least two "modes" of single channel bursting activity, lasting approximately 100 ms at alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A)Rs. The most prevalent bursting mode had a P(O) of approximately 0.7 and was described by a reaction scheme with three open and three shut states, whereas the "high" P(O) mode ( approximately 0.9) was characterized by two shut and three open states. Single channel activity elicited by THIP in alpha(4)beta(2)delta and alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2S) GABA(A)Rs occurred as a single population of bursts (P(O) approximately 0.4-0.5) of moderate duration (approximately 33 ms) that could be described by schemes containing two shut and two open states for both GABA(A)Rs. Our data identify kinetic properties that are receptor-subtype specific and others that are agonist specific, including unitary conductance.
    The Journal of General Physiology 01/2008; 131(2):163-181. · 4.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Etomidate is a potent general anesthetic that acts as an allosteric co-agonist at GABAA receptors. Photoreactive etomidate derivatives labeled αM236 in transmembrane domain M1, which structural models locate in the β+/α- subunit interface. Other nearby residues may also contribute to etomidate binding and/or transduction through rearrangement of the site. In human α1β2γ2L GABAA receptors, we applied the substituted cysteine accessibility method to α1-M1 domain residues extending from α1Q229 to α1Q242. We used electrophysiology to characterize each mutant's sensitivity to GABA and etomidate. We also measured rates of sulfhydryl modification by p-chloromercuribenzenesulfonate (pCMBS) with and without GABA and tested if etomidate blocks modification of pCMBS-accessible cysteines. Cys substitutions in the outer α1-M1 domain impaired GABA activation and variably affected etomidate sensitivity. In seven of eight residues where pCMBS modification was evident, rates of modification were accelerated by GABA co-application, indicating that channel activation increases water and/or pCMBS access. Etomidate reduced the rate of modification for cysteine substitutions at α1M236, α1L232 and α1T237. We infer that these residues, predicted to face β2-M3 or M2 domains, contribute to etomidate binding. Thus, etomidate interacts with a short segment of the outer α1-M1 helix within a sub-domain that undergoes significant structural rearrangement during channel gating. Our results are consistent with in silico docking calculations in a homology model that orient the long axis of etomidate approximately orthogonal to the transmembrane axis.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 09/2013; · 4.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Synaptic GABAA receptors (GABAARs) mediate most of the inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain. The majority of these receptors are comprised of α1, β2 and γ2 subunits. The amygdala, a structure involved in processing emotional stimuli, expresses α2 and γ1 subunits at high levels. The effect of these subunits on GABAAR-mediated synaptic transmission is not known. Understanding the influence of these subunits on GABAAR-mediated synaptic currents may help in identifying the roles and locations of amygdala synapses that contain these subunits. Here, we describe the biophysical and synaptic properties of pure populations of α1β2γ2, α2β2γ2, α1β2γ1 and α2β2γ1 GABAARs. Their synaptic properties were examined in engineered synapses, whereas their kinetic properties were studied using rapid agonist application, and single channel recordings. All macropatch currents activated rapidly (<1ms) and deactivated as a function of the α-subunit, with α2-containing GABAARs consistently deactivating ~10-fold more slowly. Single channel analysis revealed that the slower current decay of α2-containing GABAARs was due to longer burst durations at low GABA concentrations, corresponding to a ~4-fold higher affinity for GABA. Synaptic currents revealed a different pattern of activation and deactivation to that of macropatch data. The inclusion of α2 and γ1 subunits slowed both the activation and deactivation rates, suggesting that receptors containing these subunits cluster more diffusely at synapses. Switching the intracellular domains of the γ2 and γ1 subunits substantiated this inference. Because this region determines post-synaptic localization, we hypothezise that GABAARs containing γ1 and γ2 use different mechanisms for synaptic clustering.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 01/2014; 289(9). · 4.60 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from