The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-Effective Measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 48823, USA.
Psychological Assessment (Impact Factor: 2.99). 07/2006; 18(2):192-203. DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Mini-IPIP, a 20-item short form of the 50-item International Personality Item Pool-Five-Factor Model measure (Goldberg, 1999), was developed and validated across five studies. The Mini-IPIP scales, with four items per Big Five trait, had consistent and acceptable internal consistencies across five studies (= at or well above .60), similar coverage of facets as other broad Big Five measures (Study 2), and test-retest correlations that were quite similar to the parent measure across intervals of a few weeks (Study 4) and several months (Study 5). Moreover, the Mini-IPIP scales showed a comparable pattern of convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validity (Studies 2-5) with other Big Five measures. Collectively, these results indicate that the Mini-IPIP is a psychometrically acceptable and practically useful short measure of the Big Five factors of personality.

Download full-text


Available from: Frederick L Oswald, Aug 25, 2015
  • Source
    • "In our sample, the mean interitem correlations for each scale were comparable to those in earlier published studies (Donnellan et al., 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dispositional reasoning is defined as general reasoning about traits, behaviors, and situations. Although earlier accuracy studies found that it predicted interview judgment accuracy, they did not distinguish between its underlying components (i.e., trait induction, trait extrapolation, and trait contextualization). This drawback has hampered insight into the nature of the dispositional reasoning construct. Therefore, we use a componential approach to test if dispositional reasoning adheres to classical criteria for an intelligence. Results from 146 managerial interviewers who observed videotaped interviewees showed that the dispositional reasoning components had positive manifold and predicted interview accuracy. Moreover, they demonstrated discriminant validity with personality and incremental validity over cognitive ability in predicting interview accuracy. Together, findings suggest that dispositional reasoning broadly adheres to the classical criteria for an intelligence.
    Human Performance 07/2015; 28(3):199-221. DOI:10.1080/08959285.2015.1021046 · 1.27 Impact Factor
    • "g . , Ames , Rose , & Anderson , 2005 ; Bryant & Smith , 2001 ; Donnellan , Oswald , Baird , & Lucas , 2009 ; Fraley , Waller , & Brennan , 2000 ; Gosling , Rentfrow , & Swann , 2003 ; Jonason & Web - ster , 2010 ; Nichols & Webster , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 ; Rammstedt & John , 2007 ; Robins , Hendin , & Trzesniewski , 2001 ; Web - ster & Crysel , 2012 ; Webster et al . , 2014 ; Webster & Jonason , 2013 ; Widaman et al . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In contexts that increasingly demand brief self-report measures (e.g., experience sampling, longitudinal and field studies), researchers seek succinct surveys that maintain reliability and validity. One such measure is the 12-item Brief Aggression Questionnaire (BAQ; Webster et al., 2014), which uses 4 3-item subscales: Physical Aggression, Verbal Aggression, Anger, and Hostility. Although prior work suggests the BAQ's scores are reliable and valid, we addressed some lingering concerns. Across 3 studies (N = 1,279), we found that the BAQ had a 4-factor structure, possessed long-term test-retest reliability across 12 weeks, predicted differences in behavioral aggression over time in a laboratory experiment, generalized to a diverse nonstudent sample, and showed convergent validity with a displaced aggression measure. In addition, the BAQ's 3-item Anger subscale showed convergent validity with a trait anger measure. We discuss the BAQ's potential reliability, validity, limitations, and uses as an efficient measure of aggressive traits.
    Journal of Personality Assessment 06/2015; DOI:10.1080/00223891.2015.1044093 · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "We selected this scale because of its emphasis on social attention. The items in the Donnellan et al. (2006) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extraversion has exhibited inconsistent relationships with employees’ interpersonal citizenship. Across three studies, we integrate literature on personality with impression management and socioanalytic theories to propose that employees’ impression management motives act as a contingency, strengthening the relationship between extraversion and interpersonal citizenship. First, in Studies 1 and 2, across two settings (field and university) and two designs (nonexperimental and experimental), we confirm that extraverted individuals engage in citizenship to a greater extent when they are also either predisposed (Study 1) or cued (Study 2) to manage others’ impressions. In Study 3, we extend these findings by using a conditional mediation process model to develop and test the hypothesis that an individual’s strategy to get along serves as an explanatory mechanism to the interactive effect of extraversion and impression management motives on interpersonal citizenship. Overall, our results suggest that the prediction of interpersonal citizenship can be improved when considering the conjoint influence of employees’ extraversion and impression management motives.
    Journal of Management 01/2015; DOI:10.1177/0149206312471396 · 6.86 Impact Factor
Show more