Phase transition of a DPPC bilayer induced by an external surface pressure: from bilayer to monolayer behavior. a molecular dynamics simulation study.

Centro de Electroquíca y Materiales Inteligentes (CEMI), Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Aulario II, Campus de Alfonso XIII, 30203 Cartagena, Murcia, Spain. javier.lopez@
Langmuir (Impact Factor: 4.38). 07/2006; 22(13):5818-24. DOI: 10.1021/la0602315
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Understanding the lipid phase transition of lipid bilayers is of great interest from biophysical, physicochemical, and technological points of view. With the aim of elucidating the structural changes that take place in a DPPC phospholipid bilayer induced by an external isotropic surface pressure, five computer simulations were carried out in a range from 0.1 to 40 mN/m. Molecular dynamics simulations provided insight into the structural changes that took place in the lipid structure. It was seen that low pressures ranging from 0.1 to 1 mN/m had hardly any effect on the structure, electrical properties, or hydration of the lipid bilayer. However, for pressures above 40 mN/m, there was a sharp change in the lipid-lipid interactions, hydrocarbon lipid fluidity, and electrostatic potential, corresponding to the mesomorphic transition from a liquid crystalline state (L(alpha)) to its gel state (P'(beta)). The head lipid orientation remained almost unaltered, parallel to the lipid layer, as the surface pressure was increased, although a noticeable change in its angular distribution function was evident with the phase transition.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Phase behavior of lipid bilayers at high pressure is critical to biological processes. Using coarse grained molecular dynamic simulations, we report critical characteristics of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers with applied high pressure, and also show their phase transition by cooling bilayer patches. Our results indicate that the phase transition temperature of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers obviously shifts with pressure increasing in the rate of 37 °C kbar(-1), which are in agreement with experimental data. Moreover, the main phase transition is revealed to be strongly dependent on lipid area. A critical lipid area of ~0.57 nm(2) is found on the main phase transition boundary. Similar structures of acyl chains lead to the same sensitivity of phase transition temperature of different lipids to the pressure. Based on the lateral density and pressure profiles, we also discuss the different effects on bilayer structure induced by high temperature and high pressure, e.g., increasing temperature induces higher degree of interdigitation of lipid tails and thinner bilayers, and increasing pressure maintains the degree of interdigitation and bilayer thickness.
    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 03/2012; 14(16):5744-52. · 4.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While the surface tension of a cell membrane, or a plasma membrane, regulates cell functions, little is known about its effect on the conformational changes of the lipid bilayer and hence the resulting changes in the cell membrane. To obtain some insights into the phase transition of the lipid bilayer as a function of surface tension, we used a 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) bilayer as a model lipid bilayer and aquaporin (AqpZ), a transmembrane channel protein for water, as a model embedded protein. A coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulation was applied to illustrate the phase transition behavior of the pure DPPC bilayer and aquaporin-embedded DPPC bilayer under different surface tensions. It was shown that an increased surface tension reduced the phase transition temperature of the DPPC bilayer. As for the DPPC bilayer in gel form, no significant changes occurred in the structure of the bilayer in response to the surface tension. Once in a liquid crystal state, both the structure and properties of the DPPC bilayer, such as area per lipid, lipid order parameters, bilayer thickness and lateral diffusion coefficients, were responsive to the magnitude of surface tension in a linear way. The presence of aquaporin attenuated the compact alignment of the lipid bilayer, hindered the parallel movement, and thus made the DPPC bilayer less sensitive to the surface tension.
    Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 03/2014; · 4.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An atomistic-level understanding of cationic lipid monolayers is essential for development of gene delivery agents based on cationic micelle-like structures. We employ molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for a detailed atomistic study of lipid monolayers composed of both pure zwitterionic dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and a mixture of DPPC and cationic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) at the air/water interface. We aim to investigate how the composition of the DPPC/CTAB monolayers affects their structural and electrostatic properties in the liquid-expanded phase. By varying the molar fraction of CTAB, we found the cationic CTAB lipids have significant condensing effect on the DPPC/CTAB monolayers, i.e., at the same surface tension or surface pressure, monolayers with higher CTAB molar fraction have smaller area per lipid. The DPPC/CTAB monolayers are also able to achieve negative surface tension without introducing buckling into the monolayer structure. We also found the condensing effect is caused by the interplay between the cationic CTAB headgroups and the zwitterionic phosphatidylcholine (PC) headgroups which has electrostatic origin. With CTAB in its vicinity, the P-N vector of PC headgroups reorients from being parallel to the monolayer plane to a more vertical orientation. Moreover, detailed analysis of the structural properties of the monolayers, such as the density profile analysis, hydrogen bonding analysis, chain order parameter calculations and radial distribution function calculations were also performed for better understanding of cationic DPPC/CTAB monolayers.
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 09/2014; · 3.61 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014