Protective immunity provided by HLA-A2 epitopes for fusion and hemagglutinin proteins of measles virus

Vaccine Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10-Rm 6B-09, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1578, USA.
Virology (Impact Factor: 3.32). 10/2006; 352(2):390-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.04.040
Source: PubMed


Natural infection and vaccination with a live-attenuated measles virus (MV) induce CD8(+) T-cell-mediated immune responses that may play a central role in controlling MV infection. In this study, we show that newly identified human HLA-A2 epitopes from MV hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins induced protective immunity in HLA-A2 transgenic mice challenged with recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing F or H protein. HLA-A2 epitopes were predicted and synthesized. Five and four peptides from H and F, respectively, bound to HLA-A2 molecules in a T2-binding assay, and four from H and two from F could induce peptide-specific CD8+ T cell responses in HLA-A2 transgenic mice. Further experiments proved that three peptides from H (H9-567, H10-250, and H10-516) and one from F protein (F9-57) were endogenously processed and presented on HLA-A2 molecules. All peptides tested in this study are common to 5 different strains of MV including Edmonston. In both A2K(b) and HHD-2 mice, the identified peptide epitopes induced protective immunity against recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing H or F. Because F and H proteins induce neutralizing antibodies, they are major components of new vaccine strategies, and therefore data from this study will contribute to the development of new vaccines against MV infection.

Download full-text


Available from: Diane E Griffin, Jun 07, 2014
1 Follower
12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To characterize the measles virus (MV)-specific T cell responses important for evaluation of measles vaccines, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-positive and -negative adults immunized with measles-mumps-rubella vaccine were studied. Both groups developed increases in antibody and in interferon (IFN)- gamma -producing cells in response to pooled hemagglutinin (H) and fusion peptides. HLA-A2-binding peptides were predicted for all MV-encoded proteins and confirmed by T2 cell stabilization. Twenty-nine peptides were tested, and 19 (6 from H) stimulated increased IFN- gamma secretion in a majority of vaccinees. Peptide-loaded HLA-A2 tetramers or immunoglobulin dimers documented MV-specific CD8+ T cell responses after vaccination and during measles and confirmed new A2 epitopes in H (250-259 and 516-525 aa) and matrix (M; 50-58 aa) protein and previously described epitopes in H (30-38 aa), M (211-219 aa), and nonstructural protein C (84-92 aa). No single peptide dominated the response. We conclude that H is an important stimulus for CD8+ T cell as well as for antibody responses in HLA-A2-positive individuals.
    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 07/2007; 195(12):1799-807. DOI:10.1086/518006 · 6.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Measles remains an important cause of vaccine-preventable child mortality. Development of a low-cost, heat-stable vaccine for infants under the age of 6 months could improve measles control by facilitating delivery at the time of other vaccines and by closing a window of susceptibility prior to immunization at 9 months of age. DNA vaccines hold promise for development, but achieving protective levels of antibody has been difficult and there is an incomplete understanding of protective immunity. In the current study, we evaluated the use of a layered alphavirus DNA/RNA vector encoding measles virus H (SINCP-H) adsorbed onto polylactide glycolide (PLG) microparticles. In mice, antibody and T-cell responses to PLG-formulated DNA were substantially improved compared to those to naked DNA. Rhesus macaques received two doses of PLG/SINCP-H delivered either intramuscularly (0.5 mg) or intradermally (0.5 or 0.1 mg). Antibody and T-cell responses were induced but not sustained. On challenge, the intramuscularly vaccinated monkeys did not develop rashes and had lower viremias than vector-treated control monkeys. Monkeys vaccinated with the same dose intradermally developed rashes and viremia. Monkeys vaccinated intradermally with the low dose developed more severe rashes, with histopathologic evidence of syncytia and intense dermal and epidermal inflammation, eosinophilia, and higher viremia compared to vector-treated control monkeys. Protection after challenge correlated with gamma interferon-producing T cells and with early production of high-avidity antibody that bound wild-type H protein. We conclude that PLG/SINCP-H is most efficacious when delivered intramuscularly but does not provide an advantage over standard DNA vaccines for protection against measles.
    Clinical and vaccine Immunology: CVI 05/2008; 15(4):697-706. DOI:10.1128/CVI.00045-08 · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Isolation of measles virus in tissue culture by Enders and colleagues in the 1960s led to the development of the first measles vaccines. An inactivated vaccine provided only short-term protection and induced poor T cell responses and antibody that did not undergo affinity maturation. The response to this vaccine primed for atypical measles, a more severe form of measles, and was withdrawn. A live attenuated virus vaccine has been highly successful in protection from measles and in elimination of endemic measles virus transmission with the use of two doses. This vaccine is administered by injection between 9 and 15 months of age. Measles control would be facilitated if infants could be immunized at a younger age, if the vaccine were thermostable, and if delivery did not require a needle and syringe. To these ends, new vaccines are under development using macaques as an animal model and various combinations of the H, F, and N viral proteins. Promising studies have been reported using DNA vaccines, subunit vaccines, and virus-vectored vaccines.
    Current topics in microbiology and immunology 02/2009; 330:191-212. DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-70617-5_10 · 4.10 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications