Identification and evaluation of molecular properties related to preclinical optimization and clinical fate.

Array BioPharma, Inc., 3200 Walnut Street, Boulder, CO 80301, USA.
Medicinal Chemistry (Impact Factor: 1.37). 12/2005; 1(6):649-55. DOI: 10.2174/157340605774598081
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The economic case for fundamental changes that are required to ensure long term viability of the pharmaceutical industry demands a close look at which compounds are advanced into clinical development. This perspective will cover recent efforts that have had the greatest influence on defining the optimal range of physical properties of compounds that are intended to act as human therapeutic agents. Our focus will be on models and properties that are most amenable to change via synthetic design, are potentially fixable in the lead optimization process, and have the greatest impact on overall attrition in clinical development. In particular, we will examine the optimal physicochemical properties for oral absorption based on solubility, permeability, and a few easily computed parameters. Additionally, the fate of compounds that have entered clinical trials provides a compelling case for adhering to the defined properties ranges. Finally, emerging data suggests that there has been a shift in the leading causes of compound attrition, and attention should now be focused on building toxicological models to guide drug discovery efforts.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is a key regulator of immune responses and therefore an important therapeutic target for the treatment of diseases that involve pathological immune escape, such as cancer. Here, we describe a robust and sensitive high-throughput screen (HTS) for IDO1 inhibitors using the Prestwick Chemical Library of 1200 FDA-approved drugs and the Maybridge HitFinder Collection of 14,000 small molecules. Of the 60 hits selected for follow-up studies, 14 displayed IC50 values below 20 μM under the secondary assay conditions, and 4 showed an activity in cellular tests. In view of the high attrition rate we used both experimental and computational techniques to identify and to characterize compounds inhibiting IDO1 through unspecific inhibition mechanisms such as chemical reactivity, redox cycling, or aggregation. One specific IDO1 inhibitor scaffold, the imidazole antifungal agents, was chosen for rational structure-based lead optimization, which led to more soluble and smaller compounds with micromolar activity.
    European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 01/2014; 84:284–301.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Lead generation is a critical element in the successful discovery of new drugs. Scientists engaged in lead generation are faced with a huge array of strategies and technologies, and new approaches are constantly emerging. In part as a reaction to the large number of options, several guidelines have been developed over the last 10 - 20 years that enable scientists to focus on approaches which are likely to lead to the discovery and development of orally available drugs. Objective and conclusions: This paper examines some of these guidelines as they relate to specific examples of lead generation for drug discovery, and contends that in many cases valuable discoveries can be made at the margins or even outside areas considered mainstream.
    Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 07/2008; 3(7):733-44. · 2.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) is the causative agent of tuberculosis, killing ~1.7 million people annually. The remarkable capacity of this pathogen to escape the host immune system for decades and then to cause active tuberculosis disease, makes M.tb a successful pathogen. Currently available anti-mycobacterial therapy has poor compliance due to requirement of prolonged treatment resulting in accelerated emergence of drug resistant strains. Hence, there is an urgent need to identify new chemical entities with novel mechanism of action and potent activity against the drug resistant strains. RESULTS: This study describes novel computational models developed for predicting inhibitors against both replicative and non-replicative phase of drug-tolerant M.tb under carbon starvation stage. These models were trained on highly diverse dataset of 2135 compounds using four classes of binary fingerprint namely PubChem, MACCS, EState, SubStructure. We achieved the best performance Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.45 using the model based on MACCS fingerprints for replicative phase inhibitor dataset. In case of non-replicative phase, Hybrid model based on PubChem, MACCS, EState, SubStructure fingerprints performed better with maximum MCC value of 0.28. In this study, we have shown that molecular weight, polar surface area and rotatable bond count of inhibitors (replicating and non-replicating phase) are significantly different from non-inhibitors. The fragment analysis suggests that substructures like hetero_N_nonbasic, heterocyclic, carboxylic_ester, and hetero_N_basic_no_H are predominant in replicating phase inhibitors while hetero_O, ketone, secondary_mixed_amine are preferred in the non-replicative phase inhibitors. It was observed that nitro, alkyne, and enamine are important for the molecules inhibiting bacilli residing in both the phases. In this study, we introduced a new algorithm based on Matthews correlation coefficient called MCCA for feature selection and found that this algorithm is better or comparable to frequency based approach. CONCLUSION: In this study, we have developed computational models to predict phase specific inhibitors against drug resistant strains of M.tb grown under carbon starvation. Based on simple molecular properties, we have derived some rules, which would be useful in robust identification of tuberculosis inhibitors. Based on these observations, we have developed a webserver for predicting inhibitors against drug tolerant M.tb H37Rv available at
    Chemistry Central Journal 03/2013; 7(1):49. · 1.31 Impact Factor