Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption.

Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 3.93). 09/2006; 96(8):1359-63. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069617
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Taxes on cigarettes have long been used to help reduce cigarette consumption. Social factors also affect cigarette consumption, but this impact has not been quantified. We computed a social unacceptability index based on individuals' responses to questions regarding locations where smoking should be allowed. A regression analysis showed that the social unacceptability index and price had similar elasticities and that their effects were independent of each other. If, through an active tobacco control campaign, the average individual's views on the social unacceptability of smoking changed to more closely resemble the views of California residents, there would be a 15% drop in cigarette consumption, equivalent to a 1.17 dollars increase in the excise tax on cigarettes.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objctives: This study purposed to examine the intention to participate in the preventive program of depression of Internet user and to offer the baseline data for development of mental health promotion program. Methods: The internet survey was performed using a self-reported questionnaire on intention to participate in the preventive program of depression, depressive symptom(with Zung's SDS) and so forth from 1,000 internet user (aged years) via two web sites at Feb(), 2006. We analyzed the intention to participate in preventive program of depression and the factors related with that intention by depressive level. Results: In the normal group, the intention to participate in a preventive program of depression was influenced significantly by counselling experience(s) on depression(p
    Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion. 01/2007; 24(1).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Respondents (N = 224) read 1 of 4 scenarios: a heavy smoker, a moderate smoker, an occasional smoker, or a nonsmoker diagnosed with lung cancer. Results showed that smokers with lung cancer received more blame than did nonsmokers. Nonsmokers assigned more blame to tobacco companies and cigarette advertising and made more negative attributions about lung cancer victims. Respondents high in smoking-cessation efficacy assigned more blame and negative attributions to lung cancer victims. This study suggests that lung cancer is stigmatized because of the widely held belief that it is preventable. Interventions must encourage smokers to be vigilant about their lung health, to know the symptoms of lung cancer, and to see their doctor immediately if they experience lung problems.
    Journal of Applied Social Psychology 06/2013; 43(S1). · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Cannabis is the most popular illicit drug in the world, but the process of its diffusion through the population has rarely been studied. The unfolding of the tobacco epidemic was accompanied by a shift in the educational gradient of users across generations. As a consequence, cannabis may show the same pattern of widening social inequalities. We test the diffusion hypotheses that a positive value in older cohorts–the more educated experimenting more–shifts to a negative one in younger cohorts–the more educated experimenting less, first for males and then females. Methods Three nationwide subsamples (18-64 years old) of representative surveys conducted in France (n = 21,818), Germany (n = 7,887) and USA (n = 37,115) in 2009-2010 recorded age at cannabis experimentation (i.e., first use), educational level, gender, and age. Cumulative prevalence of experimentation was plotted for three retrospective cohorts (50-64, 35-49, 18-34 years old at data collection) and multivariate time-discrete logistic regression was computed by gender and generation to model age at experimentation adjusted on age at data collection and educational level. This latter was measured according to four categories derived from the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) and a relative (rather than absolute) index of education. Results The findings demonstrate a consistent pattern of evolution of the prevalence, gender ratio and educational gradient across generations and countries that supports the hypothesis of an “epidemic” of cannabis experimentation that mimics the epidemic of tobacco. Conclusion We provide evidence for a cannabis epidemic model similar to the tobacco epidemic model. In the absence of clues regarding the future of cannabis use, our findings demonstrate that the gender gap is decreasing and, based on the epidemic model, suggest that we may expect widening social inequalities in cannabis experimentation if cannabis use decreases in the future.
    International Journal of Drug Policy 08/2014; · 2.40 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Dec 15, 2014