Article

Prevention of asthma during the first 5 years of life: A randomized controlled trial

University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Impact Factor: 11.25). 08/2006; 118(1):53-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.04.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Early life exposures may be important in the development of asthma and allergic disease.
To test house dust mite (HDM) avoidance and dietary fatty acid modification, implemented throughout the first 5 years of life, as interventions to prevent asthma and allergic disease.
We recruited newborns with a family history of asthma antenatally and randomized them, separately, to HDM avoidance or control and to dietary modification or control. At age 5 years, they were assessed for asthma and eczema and had skin prick tests for atopy.
Of 616 children randomized, 516 (84%) were evaluated at age 5 years. The HDM avoidance intervention resulted in a 61% reduction in HDM allergen concentrations (microg/g dust) in the child's bed but no difference in the prevalence of asthma, wheeze, or atopy (P > .1). The prevalence of eczema was higher in the active HDM avoidance group (26% vs 19%; P = .06). The ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids in plasma was lower in the active diet group (5.8 vs 7.4; P < .0001). However, the prevalence of asthma, wheezing, eczema, or atopy did not differ between the diet groups (P > .1).
Further research is required to establish whether other interventions can be recommended for the prevention of asthma and allergic disease.
House dust mite avoidance measures and dietary fatty acid modification, as implemented in this trial during infancy and early childhood, did not prevent the onset of asthma, eczema, or atopy in high-risk children.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Karen L Webb, Aug 24, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
158 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resum:Aquesta tesi doctoral consisteix en una sèrie de deu articles (8 publicats y 2 en premsa) basats en dades recollides a lestudi AMICS (Asthma Multicentre Infant Cohort Study), portat a terme a Ashford (UK) a Barcelona y a Menorca. A més dels propis articles, sinclouen una introducció i una discussió generals per a mostrar de forma conjunta les troballes i posar-les en el context de levidència científica actual. També sinclou un apartat sobre les implicacions dels resultats obtinguts tant per la recerca etiològica de lasma com per a la salut pública, així com una llista de recomanacions finals. Des de lany 1997 soc el responsable del estudi de cohort AMICS a Menorca, que ha comptat amb diverses beques del Ministeri de Sanitat i Consum, de la Comunitat Europea i duna fundació privada. Lobjectiu inicial principal del projecte europeu era mesurar el paper del aeroal.lergens domèstics més comuns en el procés diniciació de latòpia i lasma. La cohort de Menorca va ampliar el seus objectius incloent dades addicionals sobre dieta i nivells dorganoclorats a la sang. El projecte continua a Menorca i en el moment de presentar la tesi sestà realitzant el seguiment del 9 anys.Abstract:The present doctoral thesis consists of a series of ten articles (8 published and 2 in press) based on data collected from the Asthma Multicentre Infant Cohort Study (AMICS), carried out in Ashford (UK) and Barcelona and Menorca (Spain). In addition to the articles themselves, a general introduction and a general discussion are included to put together the findings of the articles in the light of present scientific evidence. A section on the implications for the etiologic research of asthma and for public health and a list of final conclusions are also included. I have been responsible of the AMICS cohort in Menorca since its origin in 1997, which has been funded by different grants from the Spanish Ministry of Health, the European Commission and a private foundation. The main initial objective of the European project was to measure the role of common domestic aeroallergens in the inception of atopy and asthma. The Menorca cohort extended its objectives including additional data on dietary habits and blood levels of organochlorine compounds. The project continues in Menorca and at the moment of presenting this thesis the 9 years follow-up work is being carried out.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rapid increase in allergic diseases in developed, high-income countries during recent decades is attributed to several changes in the environment such as urbanization and improved hygiene. This relative lack of microbial stimulation is connected to a delay in maturation of the infantile immune system and seems to predispose especially genetically prone infants to allergic diseases. Probiotics, which are live ingestible health-promoting microbes, may compensate for the lack of microbial stimulation of the developing gut immune system and may thus be beneficial in prevention of allergies. Prebiotics, which are indigestible nutrients by us, promote the growth and activity of a number of bacterial strains considered beneficial for the gut. In a large cohort of 1 223 infants at hereditary risk for allergies we studied in a double-blind placebo-controlled manner whether probiotics administered in early life prevent allergic diseases from developing. We also evaluated their safety and their effects on common childhood infections, vaccine antibody responses, and intestinal immune markers. Pregnant mothers used a mixture of four probiotic bacteria or a placebo, from their 36th week of gestation. Their infants received the same probiotics plus prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides for 6 months. The 2-year follow-up consisted of clinical examinations and allergy tests, fecal and blood sampling, and regular questionnaires. Among the 925 infants participating in the 2-year follow-up the cumulative incidence of any allergic disease (food allergy, eczema, asthma, rhinitis) was comparable in the probiotic (32%) and the placebo (35%) group. However, eczema, which was the most common manifestation (88%) of all allergic diseases, occurred less frequently in the probiotic (26%) than in the placebo group (32%). The preventive effect was more pronounced against atopic (IgE-associated) eczema which, of all atopic diseases, accounted for 92%. The relative risk reduction of eczema was 26% and of atopic eczema 34%. To prevent one case of eczema, the number of mother-infant pairs needed to treat was 16. Probiotic treatment was safe without any undesirable outcome for neonatal morbidity, feeding-related behavior, serious adverse events, growth, or for vaccine-induced antibody responses. Fewer infants in the probiotic than in the placebo group received antibiotics during their first 6 months of life and thereafter to age 2 years suffered from fewer respiratory tract infections. As a novel finding, we discovered that high fecal immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentrations at age 6 months associated with reduced risk for atopic (IgE-associated) diseases by age 2 years. In conclusion, although feeding probiotics to high-risk newborn infants showed no preventive effect on the cumulative incidence of any allergic diseases by age 2, they apparently prevented eczema. This probiotic effect was more pronounced among IgE-sensitized infants. The treatment was safe and seemed to stimulate maturation of the immune system as indicated by increased resistance to respiratory infections and improved vaccine antibody responses. Allergiat rasittavat lisääntyvästi sekä perheitä että yhteiskuntaamme. Allergioiden nopea lisääntyminen korkean elintason maissa liittynee elinympäristömme vähentyneeseen mikrobialtistukseen. Vähäinen mikrobialtistus puolestaan viivästyttää vastasyntyneen puolustusjärjestelmän kypsymistä altistaen hänet allergioiden puhkeamiselle. Prebiootit ovat ravinnon imeytymättömiä kuituja, jotka lisäävät elimistölle hyödyllisiä bakteereja suolistossa. Probiootit ovat ravinnon eläviä bakteereja, jotka jouduttavat suolessa sijaitsevan puolustusjärjestelmämme kypsymistä. Probioottien ja prebioottien on ajateltu siten ehkäisevän allergioita, mutta aiempien tutkimusten tulokset ovat olleet ristiriitaisia. Etenevään satunnaistettuun lumekontrolloituun tutkimukseen, jossa selvitimme ehkäisevätkö probiootit allergioita, osallistui 1 223 allergiariskiperhettä pääkaupunkiseudulta. Annoimme äideille loppuraskaudessa neljän probioottisen maitohappobakteerin yhdistelmää. Vastasyntyneet lapset saivat samaa valmistetta yhdessä prebioottisten galakto-oligosakkaridien kanssa 6 ensimmäisen elinkuukauden ajan. Kahden vuoden seurantaan osallistuneella 925 lapsella emme havainneet eroa probioottia ja lumetta saaneiden lasten välillä allergisten sairauksien ilmaantuvuudessa, kun vastemuuttujana käytettiin ihottuman, ruoka-allergian, astman ja allergisen nuhan yhdistelmää. Ihottuma oli yleisin allergisen sairauden ilmenemismuoto tässä ikäryhmässä (88%) ja sen ilmaantuvuus väheni probioottia saaneilla lapsilla merkitsevästi 32%:sta 26%:iin. Jos hoidettaisiin 16 äiti-lapsiparia kuten tässä tutkimuksessa, voitaisiin ihottuman puhkeaminen ehkäistä yhdellä lapsella. Ero oli selvempi atooppisesti herkistyneillä, eli lapsilla, joiden ihopistokoe oli myönteinen tai veren allergiavasta-aineet olivat lisääntyneet. Probiootti vähensi atooppisen ihottuman suhteellista riskiä 34%. Probioottien käyttö raskauden aikana tai heti vastasyntyneisyyskaudella ei lisännyt lapsen sairastavuutta koko seurannan aikana. Lapset myös kasvoivat normaalisti. Probioottiryhmän lapsille määrättiin vähemmän antibiootteja ensimmäisen 6 kuukauden aikana ja he sairastivat vähemmän hengitystieinfektioita 6 kuukauden ja 2 ikävuoden välillä. Uutena havaintona löysimme yhteyden 6 kuukauden iässä tavatun suoliston immunogobuliini A pitoisuuden ja myöhemmän allerigoiden puhkeamisen välillä: korkea IgA pitoisuus suojasi etenkin atooppisilta sairauksilta. Yhteenvetona todettiin, etteivät probiootit ehkäise minkä tahansa allergisen sairauden puhkeamista riskiperheen lapsella. Niiden varhainen käyttö vähentää kuitenkin riksiä sairastua sekä ihottumaan että atooppiseen ihottumaan kahden ensimmäisen ikävuoden aikana.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The development of oral tolerance is an antigen-dri- ven process that appears to depend on regular expo- sure to foods and other antigens during critical early stages of development. Successful tolerance is also likely to depend on other conducive exposures (such as favourable gut colonisation, breast milk and/or other immunomodulatory factors). It is now increas- ingly evident that allergen exposure is not the pri- mary cause of the allergy epidemic, and that aller- gen avoidance may be unsuccessful, or even detri- mental in allergy prevention. Indeed, rising rates of immune disease are likely to reflect a combination of many environmental changes which compromise tolerance. Understanding other early host-environ- ment interactions is essential to designing better strategies to prevent disease. This review explores the evidence for early defects in immune pathways that may be important for promoting tolerance, and the effects of environmental exposures on these pathways.
Show more