Article

Intensity Dependence of Auditory-Evoked Cortical Potentials in Fibromyalgia Patients: A Test of the Generalized Hypervigilance Hypothesis

Departamento de Psicología Clínica y Psicobiología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Journal of Pain (Impact Factor: 4.22). 08/2006; 7(7):480-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.01.452
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT On the basis of recent evidence concerning the amplification of incoming stimulation in fibromyalgia (FM) patients, it has been proposed that a generalized hypervigilance of painful and nonpainful sensations may be at the root of this disorder. So far, research into this issue has been inconclusive, possibly owing to the lack of agreement as to the operational definition of "generalized hypervigilance" and to the lack of robust objective measures characterizing the sensory style of FM patients. In this study, we recorded auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) elicited by tones of increasing intensity (60, 70, 80, 90, and 105 dB) in 27 female FM patients and 25 healthy controls. Fibromyalgia patients presented shorter N1 and P2 latencies and a stronger intensity dependence of their AEPs. Both results suggest that FM patients may be hypervigilant to sensory stimuli, especially when very loud tones are used. The most noteworthy difference between patients and control subjects is at the highest stimulus intensity, for which far more patients maintained increased N1-P2 amplitudes in relation to the 90-dB tones. The larger AEP amplitudes to the 105-dB tones suggest that defects in an inhibitory system protecting against overstimulation may be a crucial factor in the pathophysiology of FM. Because a stronger loudness dependence of AEPs has been related to weak serotonergic transmission, it is hypothesized that for many FM patients deficient inhibition of the response to noxious and intense auditory stimuli may be due to a serotonergic deficit. PERSPECTIVE: The study of auditory-evoked potentials in response to tones of increasing intensity in FM patients may help to clarify the pathophysiology of this disorder, especially regarding the role of inhibition deficits involving serotonergic dysfunction, and may be a useful tool to guide the pharmacologic treatment of FM patients.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña, Apr 23, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
99 Views
  • Source
    • "A possible downside , however, is that paying more attention to bodily sensations and worrying about them could result in increased reporting of symptoms [9] [33]. Indeed, the widespread pain complaints of fibromyalgia patients are associated with both reduced pain thresholds and tolerance (indicating somatic sensitization [16] [17] [18]) and hypervigilance (indicating cognitive sensitization [42] [43]). Additional support for the multilevel view of sensitization comes from findings showing that sensitization of the spinal cord is under cognitive control [44]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychobiological sensitization and health worry appear to be involved in the etiology of clinical manifestations of subjective health complaints (SHCs) via amplified processing of health-related information. However, it is not clear whether sensitization and health worry are also associated with common SHCs, which are extremely prevalent and are responsible for a large part of both human suffering and health care costs. In this study, we investigated whether SHCs are associated with health worry and two types of sensitization: cognitive health-related sensitization and somatic sensitization. We also examined whether health worry mediates the relationship between cognitive sensitization and SHCs and whether both levels of sensitization interact. A nonclinical sample of 47 female students completed questionnaires about their recent subjective health as well as health worry and underwent tests for cognitive sensitization, operationalized as Stroop interference and free recall performance, and somatic sensitization, operationalized as pain tolerance and pain threshold in a cold pressor task. Severity of health complaints was positively related with recall of health-related stimuli, but not with Stroop interference, and with worrying about health complaints. In addition, worry mediated the relationship between recall bias and severity of health complaints. Both the number and severity of recent health complaints were associated with pain tolerance. Pain threshold was associated with Stroop interference for health-related information. The results suggest that specific types of cognitive sensitization and somatic sensitization are associated with common health complaints and that worrying about one's complaints might play a role by enhancing biased memory of health-related information.
    Journal of Psychosomatic Research 01/2008; 63(6):673-81. DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.08.010 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Other studies used tones of other frequencies, longer duration and, most importantly, higher intensity. Intensity levels reaching about 100 dB SPL have yet shown to lead to paradoxical reductions in evoked potentials (Brocke et al., 1999; Carrillo-de-la-Pena et al., 2006). This phenomenon has been discussed as a protection mechanism against overstimulation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hyperthymic Temperament (HYT) and a closely related trait, Hypomanic Personality (HYP), have both been related to bipolar affective disorder (BAD). Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials (IAEP) is a suggested inverse indicator of serotonergic neurotransmission and has been found to be elevated in BAD. Therefore the present study explored for the first time whether subclinical variance of HYT/HYP is also associated with IAEP in a healthy sample. As several traits from biological personality research are correlated with HYT/HYP and also with BAD, the specificity of results against these traits was further analyzed by calculating multiple regression analyses. Evoked potentials were recorded from a sample (N=87) homogenous for confounding variables influencing IAEP. For this reason, only 19 to 27-year-old non-smoker psychiatrically healthy male students were included. Significant correlations were found between IAEP and both HYP and HYT. Including Sensation or Novelty Seeking and Extraversion in Regression Analyses did not weaken the associations of HYP with IAEP much, but did affect those of HYT. However, these competing biological personality traits were hardly able to predict IAEP themselves. Impulsivity, though, was able to reduce the predictive power of HYP and HYT and to explain unique IAEP-variance. This was even more the case for Behavioral-Activation-System-Sensitivity (BAS) subscale Fun Seeking clearly dominating all regression analyses. Homogeneity of sample. The impact of BAS is in agreement with the assumption that heightened BAS-sensitivity is an underlying biological cause for HYP/HYT and for BAD. Future studies on BAD should include BAS and Impulsivity besides HYP/HYT to further explore uniqueness of the latter and to develop questionnaires based on those items of a hyperthymic-hypomanic-impulsive-funseeking item pool, which possess the most external validity.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 09/2007; 101(1-3):13-26. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2006.11.018 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Augmenting/reducing is a personality dimension related to the processing of sensory stimuli. Augmenters are assumed to augment the impact of stimuli leading to stimulation-avoidant behavior and lower pain tolerance. Reducers are assumed to attenuate sensory stimuli leading to stimulation-seeking behavior and higher pain tolerance. Augmenting/reducing can be assessed by the method of evoked potentials or - as in this study - by questionnaire. Two studies were conducted to examine associations between augmenting/ reducing as assessed by questionnaire and stimulus intensity modulation. Study 1 found reducers (n = 24, 12 females) to more frequently consume psychoactive substances and to turn music on louder than augmenters (n = 25, 12 females) even after controlling for individual hearing ability. In Study 2, reducers (n = 19, 10 females) were more pain tolerant than augmenters (n = 18, 9 females) and this difference increased with increasing stimulation time. Moreover, reducers were faster than augmenters in a rapid tapping task but there was no difference in a lower-stimulation tracking task. The results suggest that differences between augmenters and reducers are most reliable when the stimulation potential is high. The clinical relevance of this construct is discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
    Journal of Individual Differences 07/2007; 28(3):165-177. DOI:10.1027/1614-0001.28.3.165 · 0.83 Impact Factor
Show more