Article

Effects of a mutual support group for families of Chinese people with schizophrenia: 18-Month follow-up

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 00, Hong Kong
The British Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.34). 08/2006; 189:41-9. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.008375
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Family intervention in schizophrenia can reduce patient relapse and improve medication adherence, but few studies on this have involved a Chinese population.
To examine the effects of a mutual support group for Chinese families of people with schizophrenia, compared with psychoeducation and standard care.
Randomised controlled trial in Hong Kong with 96 families of out-patients with schizophrenia, of whom 32 received mutual support, 33 psychoeducation and 31 standard care. The psychoeducation group included patients in all the sessions, the mutual support group did not. Intervention was provided over 6 months, and patient- and family-related psychosocial outcomes were compared over an 18-month follow-up.
Mutual support consistently produced greater improvement in patient and family functioning and caregiver burden over the intervention and follow-up periods, compared with the other two conditions. The number of readmissions did not decrease significantly, but their duration did.
Mutual support for families of Chinese people with schizophrenia can substantially benefit family and patient functioning and caregiver burden.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: David R Thompson, Jul 28, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
228 Views
  • Source
    • ". Angehörigengruppen , wie die professionell geleitete " Angehörigenrunde " zielen darauf ab, die Kompetenz und Autonomie sowie den Selbstwert der Angehörigen zu erhöhen. Sie bieten die Möglichkeit zum Austausch der eigenen Probleme und Erfahrungen und können so zur Entlastung der Angehörigen und zur Verbesserung der Selbsteffizienz und Familienfunktion beitragen [6] [8] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Relatives of patients suffering from schizophrenia are a highly burdened group. While benefits of integrating them into routine care are internationally recognised only a fraction receive adequate interventions. The present study investigates the utilisation of an open group for relatives, variables potentially associated with it and relatives' reasons for and against its utilisation. 147 relatives of in-patients and patients attending a day hospital where assessed using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), the Family Problem Questionnaire (FPQ), the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOLBREF) and a questionnaire inquiring about the utilisation of an open group for relatives. Overall, 60 relatives attended the group routinely offered at the hospital. Especially those with higher weekly contact time with patients, lower quality of life, higher subjective burden and a less positive attitude towards the patient were attenders. Important reasons to decline the offer were feelings of timidity, fear and shame, resignation and disavowal. Despite their high burden, relatives have reservations about professional support intended for them and they feel highly stigmatised. Successful integration of relatives into psychiatric care requires empathy and strong commitment.
    Neuropsychiatrie: Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation: Organ der Gesellschaft Österreichischer Nervenärzte und Psychiater 02/2009; 23(1):26-34. · 1.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Publicación ISI Email : Vikram.patel@lshtm.ac.uk We review the evidence on effectiveness of interventions for the treatment and prevention of selected mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries. Depression can be treated effectively in such countries with low-cost antidepressants or with psychological interventions (such as cognitive-behaviour therapy and interpersonal therapies). Stepped-care and collaborative models provide a framework for integration of drug and psychological treatments and help to improve rates of adherence to treatment. First-generation antipsychotic drugs are effective and cost effective for the treatment of schizophrenia; their benefits can be enhanced by psychosocial treatments, such as community-based models of care. Brief interventions delivered by primary-care professionals are effective for management of hazardous alcohol use, and pharmacological and psychosocial interventions have some benefits for people with alcohol dependence. Policies designed to reduce consumption, such as increased taxes and other control strategies, can reduce the population burden of alcohol abuse. Evidence about the efficacy of interventions for developmental disabilities is inadequate, but community-based rehabilitation models provide a low-cost, integrative framework for care of children and adults with chronic mental disabilities. Evidence for mental health interventions for people who are exposed to conflict and other disasters is still weak-especially for interventions in the midst of emergencies. Some trials of interventions for prevention of depression and developmental delays in low-income and middle-income countries show beneficial effects. Interventions for depression, delivered in primary care, are as cost effective as antiretroviral drugs for HIV/AIDS. The process and effectiveness of scaling up mental health interventions has not been adequately assessed. Such research is needed to inform the continuing process of service reform and innovation. However, we recommend that policyrnakers should act on the available evidence to scale up effective and cost-effective treatments and preventive interventions for mental disorders.
  • Source
Show more