Oral health in women during preconception and pregnancy: implications for birth outcomes and infant oral health.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, CB 7516, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7516, USA.
Maternal and Child Health Journal (Impact Factor: 2.24). 10/2006; 10(5 Suppl):S169-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-006-0095-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The mouth is an obvious portal of entry to the body, and oral health reflects and influences general health and well being. Maternal oral health has significant implications for birth outcomes and infant oral health. Maternal periodontal disease, that is, a chronic infection of the gingiva and supporting tooth structures, has been associated with preterm birth, development of preeclampsia, and delivery of a small-for-gestational age infant. Maternal oral flora is transmitted to the newborn infant, and increased cariogenic flora in the mother predisposes the infant to the development of caries. It is intriguing to consider preconception, pregnancy, or intrapartum treatment of oral health conditions as a mechanism to improve women's oral and general health, pregnancy outcomes, and their children's dental health. However, given the relationship between oral health and general health, oral health care should be a goal in its own right for all individuals. Regardless of the potential for improved oral health to improve pregnancy outcomes, public policies that support comprehensive dental services for vulnerable women of childbearing age should be expanded so that their own oral and general health is safeguarded and their children's risk of caries is reduced. Oral health promotion should include education of women and their health care providers ways to prevent oral disease from occurring, and referral for dental services when disease is present.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die Gesundheitsfrühförderung in der Schwangerschaft ist zu einem wichtigen Bestandteil in allen Bereichen der Medi-zin und Lebenslagen geworden. Im Allge-meinen dient sie der Gesunderhaltung der Mutter und soll schwere Erkrankun-gen, aber auch Lern-und Bildungsdefizi-te, soziale Benachteiligung, Probleme im Sozialverhalten und die Gefahr kriminel-ler Karrieren bei Kindern möglichst ver-hindern oder zumindest minimieren. Auch die Zahnmedizin hat im Rahmen der Gesundheitsfrühförderung eine bedeu-tende Aufgabe. Die Risikoerkennung und -minimierung (Karies, Parodontitis, usw.) sowie eine intensive Ernährungs-beratung und -lenkung (z. B. Keimüber-tragung) der Schwangeren führen bei de-ren Kindern nachweislich zu einer Ver-besserung der Mund-und allgemeinen Gesundheit. So wird durch eine adäquate zahnmedizinische Schwangerenbetreu-ung nicht nur das Kariesrisiko, sondern auch das Risiko einer Frühgeburt bzw. Untergewicht und durch Beeinflussung der Ernährungsgewohnheiten sogar das Adipositasrisiko des Kindes gesenkt. Be-reits seit Anfang der 90er Jahre beste-hen Frühpräventionskonzepte, die teil-weise erfolgreich umgesetzt werden, worauf im folgenden Artikel ausführlich eingegangen wird.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Oral microbial flora is increasingly being incriminated in oral infections. There is paucity of information on the importance of aerobic oral flora in diabetes. The purpose of this study was to compare aerobic oral microbial flora in diabetics and non-diabetics and to relate these microbes with oral infections. Materials and Methods: This study involved 154 diabetics and 111 non-diabetics aged 18 years and above. Oral washes were inoculated unto blood agar, chocolate agar, Mac Conkey agar and Sabouraud’s agar and isolates were identified by standard biochemical tests. Oral exam was conducted by a Dentist to assess oral infections and oral health status of participants. Results: Thirteen different genera of aerobic microbes were identified. The most prevalent microbes were Streptococcus sp (99.6 %), Candida albicans (17.0 %), Serratia Spp (7.2 %), other Candida Spp (6.8 %), Coagulase negative Staphylococci (CNS) (6.4 %) and Klebsiella Spp (5.7 %). Candida sp was more prevalent in diabetic patients than non-diabetics. Gram negative aerobic bacteria were significantly isolated from cases of dental caries. Conclusion: The oral microbiological profile of diabetic patients was different from those of non-diabetics and aerobic Gram negative bacteria may play an important role in dental diseases in diabetic patients.
    African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology. 09/2014; 15(3):138-143.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To compare the mean number of decayed and filled surfaces (DFS) and dental visits in the last year among pregnant women with non-pregnant women participating in the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004. Method: We included all female participants aged 15–44 years from the NHANES dataset. Pregnancy status was determined by either a laboratory pregnancy test or self-report. Mean DFS was calculated from the oral examination conducted by trained dentists. Results were tabulated by age, race/ethnicity and percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) using SAS and SUDAAN to account for NHANES complex sampling design. Result: Pregnant women Non-pregnant women N Mean DFS(95%CI) Dental visit within last year %( 95%CI) N Mean DFS(95%CI) Dental visit within last year % (95%CI) Overall 847 12.1(10.7,13.5) 49.9(42.1,57.6)* 3711 13.1(12.5,13.8) 58.1(56.0,60.1)* 15–24 years 343 10.0(7.5,12.5)* 39.9(27.3,54.0)* 1870 7.0(6.5,7.6)* 57.9(54.1,61.6)* 25–34 years 421 11.6(9.9,13.4) 50.2(39.7,60.6) 839 11.8(10.8,12.8) 57.9(54.0,61.8) 35–44 years 83 18.7(13.1,25.1) 67.8(43.1,85.5) 1002 18.9(17.9,20.1) 58.3(54.9,61.7) Non-Hispanic White 382 13.1(11.4,15.2) 56.9(45.7,67.4) 1454 14.2(13.3,15.1) 62.0(59.3,64.6) Non-Hispanic Black 136 9.9(8.3,11.6) 38.3(24.6,54.0) 904 10.2(9.4,11.0) 48.5(43.9,53.1) Mexican-American 237 9.4(7.1,11.7) 29.3(20.5,39.9)* 1045 10.9(9.7,12.1) 47.7(42.0,53.5)* <100%FPL 210 11.0(8.7,13.5) 26.4(16.2,40.1) 949 11.0(9.9,12.0) 45.5(40.7,50.4) 100% –199% FPL 180 9.8(5.6,13.5) 50.3(30.7,69.9) 879 12.0(10.6,13.5) 49.2(42.6,55.9) ≥200%FPL 399 13.5(11.7,15.4) 56.2(46.4,65.5) 1621 14.6(13.7,15.5) 65.9(62.7,69.0) Note: Missing values and other categories in race/ethnicity not listed * p-value <0.05 comparing pregnant women to non-pregnant women Conclusion: Younger pregnant women are more likely to have more dental carries than their non-pregnant counterparts. There are significant differences overall in the number of pregnant women having dental visits in the past year compared to non-pregnant women, and this difference is significant among younger women and Mexican-Americans. Additional research on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors on dental visits among pregnant women is warranted since it is recommended that pregnant women visit a dentist regularly during pregnancy.
    AADR Annual Meeting 2012; 03/2012


Available from