Article

Suicide in recently released prisoners: a population-based cohort study

Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 45.22). 08/2006; 368(9530):119-23. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69002-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Several studies have been undertaken on suicide in custody, but few on suicide after the release from prison. We undertook a population-based cohort study to investigate suicide rates in recently released prisoners in England and Wales.
We used the database of the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness for England and Wales to identify all individuals who died by suicide or who received an open verdict at the coroner's inquest between 2000 and 2002. These records were linked to a Home Office register to identify all such deaths in people within 1 year of release from prison in England and Wales. We compared suicide rates per 100,000 person-years in these released prisoners with rates in the general population by using the indirectly age-standardised mortality ratio.
We identified 382 suicides occurring in 244 988 individuals within 1 year of release from prison; a suicide rate of 156 per 100 000 person-years. 79 (21%) suicides occurred within the first 28 days after release. In all age groups, suicide rates were higher in recently released prisoners than in the general population. The overall age-standardised mortality ratio for recently released prisoners was 8.3 (95% CI 7.5-9.3) for men and 35.8 (25.4-50.2) for women.
Recently released prisoners are at a much greater risk of suicide than the general population, especially in the first few weeks after release. The risk of suicide in recently released prisoners is approaching that seen in discharged psychiatric patients. A shared responsibility lies with the prison, probation, health, and social services to develop more collaborative practices in providing services for this high-risk group.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Daniel Pratt, Apr 04, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
182 Views
  • Source
    • "difference in mortality rates between former prisoners and non-imprisoned offenders of similar age and gender was substantially smaller and even became nonsignificant when former prisoners were compared with nonimprisoned offenders who were similar regarding age, gender, and propensity score. Our finding that former prisoners were more likely to die after release from prison is in line with other reports (e.g., Binswanger et al. 2007; Farrell and Marsden 2007; Joukamaa 1998; Kariminia et al. 2007; Pratt et al. 2006; Spaulding, Allen, and Stone 2007). The magnitude of the standardized mortality risks of ex-prisoners observed in our study, and in the other 24 studies, differed substantially between studies (Table 1). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: To examine the effects of first-time imprisonment on postprison mortality. Method: Data are used from a longitudinal study examining criminal behavior and mortality over a 25-year period in a representative group of 2,297 Dutch offenders who had their criminal case adjudicated in 1977. Of these offenders, 597 were imprisoned for the first-time in their lives in 1977. The remaining 1,700 offenders got a noncustodial sentence. Ex-prisoners' mortality rates and causes of death are compared with those in the general population and those in a matched control group of non-imprisoned offenders. Propensity score matching is used to minimize selection bias. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals are used to examine whether mortality among the ex-prisoners differ significantly from the general population or from the non-imprisoned controls. Results: About 18 percent of the imprisoned offenders died over the 25-year follow-up period. Compared with the general population (age and gender adjusted), ex-prisoners are three times as likely to die during the 25-year follow-up (odds ratio [OR] = 3.21). Compared with a more appropriate control group of non-imprisoned offenders (matched on age, gender, and propensity score), ex-prisoners are no longer significantly more likely to die (OR = 1.40). Conclusions: The results of the present study emphasize the importance of constructing appropriate comparison groups when examining the effects of imprisonment on postprison mortality.
    Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 08/2012; 49(3):383-419. DOI:10.1177/0022427811415534 · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The leading causes of death were heterogeneous, including drug overdose, cardiovascular disease, homicide, suicide, motor vehicle accidents and cancer (Binswanger et al., 2007). International studies have shown suicide to be a major cause of death in the post-release period (Binswanger et al., 2007; Joukamaa, 1998; Kariminia et al., 2007; Pratt et al., 2006). However, little is known about the health-related experiences, medical and mental health needs, and risk perceptions of former inmates during the transition from prison release to the community. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In many states, budget constraints are prompting earlier release of prison inmates. Prior studies have demonstrated elevated mortality rates in the post-release period but little is known about the health experiences of former inmates in the transition from prison to the community. The objective of this study was to understand the health-seeking experiences, perceptions of risk, and medical and mental health needs of former prisoners in the first two months after release from prison. Participants consisted of 29 former inmates within the first two months after their release from prison to the Denver, Colorado area. Using qualitative methods, trained interviewers conducted individual, in-person, semi-structured interviews exploring participants' experiences with health, mental health, and health care since release. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed utilizing a team-based approach to inductive analysis. We found that health-related behavior occurred in the context of a complex life experience, with logistical problems exacerbated by emotional distress. Major themes included 1) transitional challenges; 2) cognitive responses including perceptions about personal risk, knowledge and priorities; 3) emotional responses including pronounced stress, fear, anxiety, disappointment; and 4) health behaviors. Former inmates reported multiple challenges, poor transitional preparation preceding release, and inadequate or absent continuity of mental and physical health care in the context of significant emotional distress and anxiety. Improved release planning, coordination between the medical, mental health and criminal justice systems may reduce the risk of poor health outcomes for this population.
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 07/2011; 34(4):249-55. DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.07.002 · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "I argue that contemporary Anglo-American societies (not just Britain, but Britain represents a typical example) are particularly bad at reintegrating and re-accepting individuals who have committed offenses back into wider society (see Petersilia, 2003; Travis, 2005). Evidence of this failing can be found in the rates of released prisoners being returned to prison (Kubrin and Stewart, 2006), as well as in the high rates of suicide among recently released ex-prisoners in the United States (Binswanger et al., 2007), Australia (Kariminia et al., 2007) and the United Kingdom (Pratt et al., 2006). Equally telling is the preoccupation that the Anglo-American media has with the release of prisoners – a prime example of which was the media-fueled panic following the British government's recent decision to release a large number of prisoners 18 days earlier than their scheduled release date to clear space in the overcrowded prison system (Ford, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mary Douglas argues that, ‘There are some things we cannot experience without ritual.’ Ex-prisoner reintegration may be one of them. The punishment process involves an inordinate amount of ritual behavior, from the drama of the courtroom to the elaborate de-individuation processes involved in institutionalization. Durkheim argues that these rituals serve a distinct purpose for society: engendering social solidarity and shaping penal sensibilities. Like the commission of a crime, the reintegration of the former outcast back into society represents a challenge to the moral order, a delicate transition fraught with danger and possibility. However, unlike punishment, reintegration is not a process characterized by well-orchestrated and familiar rituals. This lack might explain the failings of prisoner reentry in contemporary society. This article reviews the sociological and anthropological literature on rituals, explaining what they are and what they do, focusing in particular on the role of status degradation ceremonies in criminal justice work. Drawing on this literature, the core elements that would be needed to develop rituals of reintegration powerful enough to counteract these degradation effects are discussed, and the potential impact of such hypothetical rituals is explored.
    Punishment &amp Society 01/2011; 13(1):3-28. DOI:10.1177/1462474510385641 · 1.42 Impact Factor
Show more