Article

An assessment of incremental coronary risk prediction using C-reactive protein and other novel risk markers - The atherosclerosis risk in communities study

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 08/2006; 166(13):1368-73. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.13.1368
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There has been interest in recent years in whether additional, and in particular novel, risk factors or blood markers, such as C-reactive protein, can enhance existing coronary heart disease (CHD) prediction models.
Using a series of case-cohort studies, the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study assessed the association of 19 novel risk markers with incident CHD in 15,792 adults followed up since 1987-1989. Novel markers included measures of inflammation, endothelial function, fibrin formation, fibrinolysis, B vitamins, and antibodies to infectious agents. Change in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the additional contribution of novel risk markers to CHD prediction beyond that of traditional risk factors.
The basic risk factor model, which included traditional risk factors (age, race, sex, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, smoking status, and diabetes), predicted CHD well, as evidenced by an AUC of approximately 0.8. The C-reactive protein level did not add significantly to the AUC (increase in AUC of 0.003), and neither did most other novel risk factors. Of the 19 markers studied, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2), vitamin B(6), interleukin 6, and soluble thrombomodulin added the most to the AUC (range, 0.006-0.011).
Our findings suggest that routine measurement of these novel markers is not warranted for risk assessment. On the other hand, our findings reinforce the utility of major, modifiable risk factor assessment to identify individuals at risk for CHD for preventive action.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
60 Views
  • Frontiers in Bioscience 01/2011; 16(1):486. DOI:10.2741/3700 · 4.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the age-adjusted Framingham risk score (AFRS), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), fibrinogen, homocysteine, and free fatty acid (FFA) can predict future cardiovascular events (CVEs), a comparison of these risk assessments for patients with stable angina has not been reported. We enrolled 203 patients with stable angina who had been scheduled for coronary angiography (CAG). After CAG, 134 patients showed significant coronary artery disease. During 4.2 yr follow-up, 36 patients (18%) showed CVEs, including myocardial infarction, de-novo coronary artery revascularization, in-stent restenosis, stroke, and cardiovascular death. ROC analysis showed that AFRS, FMD, baPWV, and hsCRP could predict CVEs (with AUC values of 0.752, 0.707, 0.659, and 0.702, respectively, all P<0.001 except baPWV P=0.003). A Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that AFRS and FMD were independent predictors of CVEs (HR, 2.945; 95% CI, 1.572-5.522; P=0.001 and HR, 0.914; 95% CI, 0.826-0.989; P=0.008, respectively). However, there was no difference in predictive power between combining AFRS plus FMD and AFRS alone (AUC 0.752 vs. 0.763; z=1.358, P=0.175). In patients with stable angina, AFRS and FMD are independent predictors of CVEs. However, there is no additive value of FMD on the AFRS in predicting CVEs.
    Journal of Korean Medical Science 10/2014; 29(10):1391-7. DOI:10.3346/jkms.2014.29.10.1391 · 1.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is alarmingly increasing worldwide. Albeit advances in therapy have reduced morbidity and mortality in T2DM, cardiovascular risk is far to be eradicated and mechanism-based therapeutic approaches are in high demand. In this perspective, deciphering novel molecular networks of vascular disease will be instrumental to develop novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in people affected by diabetes. There is therefore a need to address current knowledge gaps in disease aetiology in order to support innovation in diagnosis and treatment. Unfortunately, we are still lacking cost-effective markers able to identify atherosclerotic vascular disease at an early stage. The issue of risk stratification deserves attention because not every T2DM patient carries the same degree of inflammation and oxidative stress. The diversity of metabolic phenotypes with different outcomes underscores the need for cardiovascular risk stratification within such heterogeneous population. Early predictors of vascular damage are mandatory to implement intensive treatment strategies and, hence, reduce cardiovascular disease burden in this setting. In this review we critically discuss novel molecular mechanisms of diabetic vascular disease and their possible translation to the clinical setting.

Preview

Download
0 Downloads